Barbieri Andrea, Mantovani Francesca, Bursi Francesca, Bartolacelli Ylenia, Manicardi Marcella, Lauria Maria Giulia, Boriani Giuseppe
Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Univarsitaria Policlinico Di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2018 Jan-Mar;28(1):32-38. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_48_17.
Data on stress echocardiography (SE) time-related changes in referral patterns and diagnostic yield for detection of inducible ischemia could enhance Echo Lab quality benchmarks and performance measures.
This study aims to evaluate temporal trends in SE test results among ambulatory patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) in a tertiary care referral center with moderate (>100/year) volume SE activities and Cath-Lab facility.
From January 2004 to December 2015, 1954 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 42% women, 27% with known CAD) underwent SE (1673 exercise SE, 86%, 246 pharmacological SE, 12%, 35 pacing SE, 2%). Time was grouped into three 4 year periods, where clinical data and test results were evaluated.
Our series comprised low-to-intermediate pretest probability of CAD throughout the observation period (overall pretest probability of CAD 19% ± 15%). A progressive decline over time in the rate of pharmacological SE instead of a dramatic increment of exercise SE (79%-96%, < 0.0001) was noted. The use of beta-blockers increased (from 43% to 66%, < 0.0001), while the use of nitrates decreased (from 11% to 4%, < 0.0001) over time. We noted a very uncommon occurrence of abnormal test results with a further decrease in the last period (from 11% to 3%, < 0.0001).
We observed, over a 12-year period, a progressive decrease in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia among patients with known or suspected CADe referred to our Echo Lab for SE with Cath-Lab facility, and this trend was parallel to changes in SE referral practice. These findings are particularly relevant if we consider the practical implications on diagnostic SE accuracy and risk assessment.
关于负荷超声心动图(SE)在转诊模式和检测诱发性心肌缺血诊断率方面与时间相关变化的数据,可提升超声心动图实验室的质量基准和性能指标。
本研究旨在评估在一家拥有中等(每年>100例)负荷超声心动图检查量及心导管实验室设施的三级医疗转诊中心,疑似或已知冠心病(CAD)的门诊患者中,SE检查结果的时间趋势。
2004年1月至2015年12月,1954例患者(平均年龄62±12岁,42%为女性,27%已知患有CAD)接受了SE检查(1673例运动负荷SE,占86%;246例药物负荷SE,占12%;35例起搏负荷SE,占2%)。时间分为三个4年时间段,对临床数据和检查结果进行评估。
在整个观察期内,我们的系列研究包括CAD的低至中等预检概率(CAD总体预检概率为19%±15%)。注意到药物负荷SE的比例随时间逐渐下降,而非运动负荷SE显著增加(从79%降至96%,P<0.0001)。随着时间推移,β受体阻滞剂使用增加(从43%增至66%,P<0.0001),而硝酸盐使用减少(从11%降至4%,P<0.0001)。我们注意到异常检查结果的发生率非常低,且在最后一个时间段进一步下降(从11%降至3%,P<0.0001)。
在12年期间,我们观察到在有心导管实验室设施的情况下,转诊至我们超声心动图实验室进行SE检查的已知或疑似CAD患者中,诱发性心肌缺血的频率逐渐下降,且这一趋势与SE转诊实践的变化平行。如果考虑到对诊断性SE准确性和风险评估的实际影响,这些发现尤为重要。