Albrecht Jennifer S, Kirk Jennifer, Ryan Kathleen A, Falvey Jason R
Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (Drs Albrecht, Kirk, and Falvey), Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition (Ms Ryan), Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science (Dr Falvey), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(2):57-64. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
Understanding the extent to which neighborhood impacts recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults could spur targeting of rehabilitation and other services to those living in more disadvantaged areas. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which neighborhood disadvantage influences recovery following TBI among older adults.
Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years hospitalized with TBI 2010-2018.
In this retrospective cohort study, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood deprivation by linking it to 9-digit beneficiary zip codes. We used national-level rankings to divide the cohort into the top 10% (highest neighborhood disadvantage), middle 11-90%, and bottom 10% (lowest neighborhood disadvantage). Recovery was operationalized as days at home, calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from monthly follow-up over the year post-TBI.
Among 13,747 Medicare beneficiaries with TBI, 1713 (12.7%) were in the lowest decile of ADI rankings and 1030 (7.6%) were in the highest decile of ADI rankings. Following covariate adjustment, beneficiaries in neighborhoods with greatest disadvantage [rate ratio (RtR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 0.98] and beneficiaries in middle ADI percentiles (RtR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) had fewer days at home per month compared to beneficiaries in neighborhoods with lowest disadvantage.
This study provides evidence that neighborhood is associated with recovery from TBI among older adults and highlights days at home as a recovery metric that is responsive to differences in neighborhood disadvantage.
了解社区环境对老年人创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后恢复的影响程度,可能会促使将康复及其他服务目标对准生活在更贫困地区的人群。本研究的目的是确定社区劣势对老年人TBI后恢复的影响程度。
研究背景与参与者:2010年至2018年因TBI住院的65岁及以上社区医保受益人群。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,通过将地区剥夺指数(ADI)与9位数字的受益人群邮政编码相联系,来评估社区剥夺情况。我们使用国家级排名将队列分为前10%(社区劣势最高)、中间的11%-90%以及后10%(社区劣势最低)。恢复情况通过在家天数来衡量,计算方法是用TBI后一年每月随访中在护理环境中度过的天数或死亡天数相减。
在13747名患有TBI的医保受益人中,1713人(12.7%)处于ADI排名的最低十分位数,1030人(7.6%)处于ADI排名的最高十分位数。经过协变量调整后,与社区劣势最低的受益人群相比,社区劣势最大的受益人群(率比[RtR]0.96;95%置信区间[CI]0.94,0.98)以及ADI百分位数处于中间的受益人群(RtR 0.98;95% CI 0.97,0.99)每月在家天数更少。
本研究提供了证据,表明社区环境与老年人TBI后的恢复相关,并突出了在家天数作为一种能反映社区劣势差异的恢复指标。