• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二线 5 天放线菌素 D 在氨甲喋呤治疗失败的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line 5-Day Dactinomycin in Case of Methotrexate Failure for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

机构信息

Department of Gynecological Surgery and Oncology, Obstetrics, University Hospital Lyon Sud, University of Lyon 1.

Department of Medical Oncology, Alliance for Cancer Research, Tenon Hospital, Public Assistance Hospitals of Paris, Paris.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jun;28(5):1038-1044. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001248.

DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001248
PMID:29629964
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients treated for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with second-line 5-day dactinomycin after failed first-line 8-day methotrexate.

METHODS

From 1999 to 2017, patients with methotrexate resistant GTN treated with second line dactinomycin were identified at the French Trophoblastic Disease Reference Center. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we identified significant predictive factors of second line dactinomycin failure.

RESULTS

A total of 877 GTN patients were treated with first-line 8-day methotrexate, of which 103 required second-line 5-day dactinomycin for methotrexate failure. Complete response was observed in 78 patients (75.7% [95% confidence interval, 66.3-83.6]; P < 0.0001), whereas 25 needed third-line treatment, 13 for dactinomycin resistance and 12 for post-dactinomycin relapse. Overall survival of patients treated with dactinomycin was 100%. An interval of greater than or equal to 7 months between antecedent pregnancy termination and methotrexate initiation was a predictive factor significantly associated with second-line dactinomycin failure in multivariate analysis (exact odds ratio, 9.17 [95% confidence interval, 1.98-50.70]; P = 0.0029). No grades 4 and 5 adverse effects were experienced and the most common toxicity being grade 1 nausea (14.6%).

CONCLUSION

Given a 75.7% complete response rate in methotrexate failed low-risk GTN patients treated with second-line dactinomycin and an overall survival rate of 100% after third-line treatment, the use of dactinomycin should be favored as second-line, regardless of human chorionic gonadotropin level at the time of dactinomycin initiation. However, an interval between the termination of the antecedent pregnancy and methotrexate initiation longer than 6 months should encourage considering alternative therapeutic strategies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在一线甲氨蝶呤治疗失败后,采用二线 5 天放线菌素 D 治疗的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者的特征和结局。

方法

自 1999 年至 2017 年,在法国滋养细胞疾病参考中心,确定了接受二线放线菌素 D 治疗的甲氨蝶呤耐药 GTN 患者。采用单因素和多因素分析,确定二线放线菌素 D 治疗失败的显著预测因素。

结果

共 877 例 GTN 患者接受一线 8 天甲氨蝶呤治疗,其中 103 例因甲氨蝶呤治疗失败需要二线 5 天放线菌素 D。78 例(75.7%[95%置信区间,66.3%-83.6%];P<0.0001)完全缓解,而 25 例需要三线治疗,13 例因放线菌素 D 耐药,12 例因放线菌素 D 治疗后复发。接受放线菌素 D 治疗的患者总生存率为 100%。多因素分析显示,在前次妊娠终止至甲氨蝶呤开始之间间隔大于或等于 7 个月是与二线放线菌素 D 治疗失败显著相关的预测因素(确切比值比,9.17[95%置信区间,1.98-50.70];P=0.0029)。未发生 4 级和 5 级不良事件,最常见的毒性为 1 级恶心(14.6%)。

结论

对于二线治疗的低危甲氨蝶呤失败的 GTN 患者,二线放线菌素 D 治疗的完全缓解率为 75.7%,三线治疗后的总生存率为 100%,因此,无论在开始使用放线菌素 D 时人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平如何,都应优先使用放线菌素 D 作为二线治疗。然而,在前次妊娠终止至甲氨蝶呤开始之间的间隔大于 6 个月,应鼓励考虑替代治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line 5-Day Dactinomycin in Case of Methotrexate Failure for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.二线 5 天放线菌素 D 在氨甲喋呤治疗失败的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤中的疗效和安全性。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jun;28(5):1038-1044. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001248.
2
Risk factors for second-line dactinomycin failure after methotrexate treatment for low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a retrospective study.低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤甲氨蝶呤治疗后二线放线菌素 D 失败的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2020 Aug;127(9):1139-1145. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16198. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Serum hCG level and rising world health organization score at second-line chemotherapy (pulse dactinomycin): poor prognostic factors for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.二线化疗(放线菌素 D 脉冲治疗)时血清 hCG 水平和不断升高的世界卫生组织评分:甲氨蝶呤治疗失败的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的不良预后因素。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Nov;20(8):1424-8. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181f5873e.
4
Pulse methotrexate versus pulse actinomycin D in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.甲氨蝶呤脉冲疗法与放线菌素D脉冲疗法治疗低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Oct;103(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
5
Risk adapted single-agent dactinomycin or carboplatin for second-line treatment of methotrexate resistant low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.风险适应性单药放线菌素或卡铂用于甲氨蝶呤耐药低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的二线治疗
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Dec;143(3):565-570. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Actinomycin D for methotrexate-failed low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.放线菌素D用于甲氨蝶呤治疗失败的低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤。
J Reprod Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(7-8):283-7.
7
Treatment of nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: factors associated with resistance to single-agent methotrexate chemotherapy.非转移性和转移性低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的治疗:对单药甲氨蝶呤化疗耐药的相关因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):572-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.039. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
8
Predictive factors of relapse in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients successfully treated with methotrexate alone.低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者经甲氨蝶呤单独治疗后复发的预测因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;215(1):80.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.183. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
9
First-line chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;7(7):CD007102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007102.pub3.
10
Direct comparisons of efficacy and safety between actinomycin-D and methotrexate in women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized and high-quality non-randomized studies.比较低危型妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者应用放线菌素 D 和甲氨蝶呤的疗效和安全性:一项随机和高质量非随机研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08849-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2025 update.妊娠滋养细胞疾病的诊断与管理:2025年更新
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Sep;171 Suppl 1:78-86. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70275. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Clinical routine care for choriocarcinoma: a descriptive analysis of data from the Baden-Wuerttemberg Cancer Registry (BWCR).绒毛膜癌的临床常规护理:来自巴登-符腾堡州癌症登记处(BWCR)数据的描述性分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08038-y.
3
Immunotherapy in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: advances and future directions.
妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的免疫治疗:进展与未来方向
Front Immunol. 2025 Apr 11;16:1544585. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1544585. eCollection 2025.
4
Case report: Multidrug resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: focus on failure of immunotherapy and success of high-dose chemotherapy.病例报告:多药耐药性妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:聚焦免疫治疗失败与大剂量化疗成功
Front Oncol. 2024 May 13;14:1391408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1391408. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluation and simplification of risk factors in FIGO 2000 scoring system for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a 19-year retrospective analysis.FIGO 2000 评分系统中妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤危险因素的评估和简化:19 年回顾性分析。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2022 Mar 15;23(3):218-229. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2100895.
6
Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update.妊娠滋养细胞疾病的诊断与管理:2021年更新
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):86-93. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13877.
7
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Current Evaluation and Management.妊娠滋养细胞疾病:当前评估与管理。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):355-370. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004240.
8
Antibiotics for cancer treatment: A double-edged sword.用于癌症治疗的抗生素:一把双刃剑。
J Cancer. 2020 Jun 28;11(17):5135-5149. doi: 10.7150/jca.47470. eCollection 2020.
9
Avelumab in Patients With Gestational Trophoblastic Tumors With Resistance to Single-Agent Chemotherapy: Cohort A of the TROPHIMMUN Phase II Trial.阿维鲁单抗治疗对单药化疗耐药的妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者:TROPHIMMUN Ⅱ期试验队列 A。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3129-3137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00803. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
10
Factors Predicting Severe Myelosuppression and Its Influence on Fertility in Patients with Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Receiving Single-Agent Methotrexate Chemotherapy.预测低危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤患者接受单药甲氨蝶呤化疗时严重骨髓抑制的因素及其对生育能力的影响
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Jun 2;12:4107-4116. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S252664. eCollection 2020.