Mattocks Kevin T, Jessee Matthew B, Mouser J Grant, Dankel Scott J, Buckner Samuel L, Bell Zachary W, Owens Johnny G, Abe Takashi, Loenneke Jeremy P
Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018 Apr;17(4):129-134. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000473.
Blood flow restriction by itself or in combination with exercise has been shown to produce beneficial adaptations to skeletal muscle. These adaptations have been observed across a range of populations, and this technique has become an attractive possibility for use in rehabilitation. Although there are concerns that applying blood flow restriction during exercise makes exercise inherently more dangerous, these concerns appear largely unfounded. Nevertheless, we have advocated that practitioners could minimize many of the risks associated with blood flow-restricted exercise by accounting for methodological factors, such as cuff width, cuff type, and the individual to which blood flow restriction is being applied. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of these methodological factors and provide evidence-based recommendations for how to apply blood flow restriction. We also provide some discussion on how blood flow restriction may serve as an effective treatment in a clinical setting.
单独使用或与运动相结合的血流限制已被证明能对骨骼肌产生有益的适应性变化。在一系列人群中都观察到了这些适应性变化,并且这项技术已成为康复领域一种颇具吸引力的应用可能性。尽管有人担心在运动期间应用血流限制会使运动本身更危险,但这些担忧似乎基本没有根据。然而,我们主张从业者可以通过考虑方法学因素,如袖带宽度、袖带类型以及应用血流限制的个体,来将与血流限制运动相关的许多风险降至最低。本文的目的是概述这些方法学因素,并为如何应用血流限制提供基于证据的建议。我们还对血流限制如何在临床环境中作为一种有效治疗方法进行了一些讨论。