1 Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University , Cambridge, United Kingdom .
2 Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London , Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom .
J Endourol. 2018 Jun;32(6):548-558. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0795. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are powerful instruments to assess the impact of a disease on health from the patient's perspective. We describe the process of designing, testing, and validating the Cambridge Ureteral Stone PROM (CUSP).
Patients recently diagnosed with ureteral stones were approached for participation in focus groups, structured interviews, and test-retest validation studies. Statistical tests included Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency, Spearman's and Pearson's correlation coefficients for test-retest validity, permutation tests of equality of means and Spearman's correlation coefficients for discriminant validity.
Forty-three patients participated in the development of the CUSP. Twenty-two patients were involved in the focus groups and structured interviews and a further 21 participated in the prospective test-retest study. Expressed comments were grouped into seven broad health domains: pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, work and daily activities, anxiety, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and urinary symptoms. Items were selected from established PROM platforms to form the draft (dCUSP) instrument, which was then used for test-retest validation and item reduction. All domains scored highly for Cronbach's alpha (>0.8), with the exception of GI symptoms. Large Spearman's (>0.76) and Pearson's correlation estimates (>0.83) were obtained for test-retest validity, suggesting that answers were reliable through the time period tested. The estimates of the Spearman's correlation coefficient between each pair of domains ranged from 0.17 to 0.78 and the upper bounds of the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were all smaller than 0.95, suggesting that each domain measures something different. The tests of equality of the mean of scores of the control (n = 25) and patient groups were all significant, suggesting that CUSP successfully discriminated patients suffering from ureteral stones for every domain.
CUSP is a patient-derived ureteral stone PROM, which can be used to measure ureteral stone disease health outcomes from the patient's point of view.
患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)是从患者角度评估疾病对健康影响的有力工具。我们描述了剑桥输尿管结石 PROM(CUSP)的设计、测试和验证过程。
最近被诊断为输尿管结石的患者被邀请参加焦点小组、结构化访谈和测试-再测试验证研究。统计检验包括内部一致性的克朗巴赫α、测试-再测试有效性的斯皮尔曼和皮尔逊相关系数、均等均值的置换检验和斯皮尔曼相关系数的判别有效性。
43 名患者参与了 CUSP 的开发。22 名患者参加了焦点小组和结构化访谈,另外 21 名患者参加了前瞻性测试-再测试研究。表达的意见被分为七个广泛的健康领域:疼痛、疲劳、睡眠障碍、工作和日常活动、焦虑、胃肠道(GI)症状和泌尿系统症状。从已建立的 PROM 平台中选择项目组成草案(dCUSP)工具,然后用于测试-再测试验证和项目缩减。除了 GI 症状外,所有领域的克朗巴赫α评分均较高(>0.8)。斯皮尔曼(>0.76)和皮尔逊(>0.83)的相关估计值较大,表明在测试期间答案是可靠的。每对领域之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数的估计值范围从 0.17 到 0.78,相应的 95%置信区间的上限都小于 0.95,表明每个领域测量的是不同的东西。对对照组(n=25)和患者组得分均值相等的检验均有统计学意义,表明 CUSP 成功区分了患有输尿管结石的患者在每个领域的情况。
CUSP 是一种源自患者的输尿管结石 PROM,可用于从患者的角度测量输尿管结石疾病的结局。