Daste C, Abdoul H, Foissac F, Papelard A, Alami S, Kwakkenbos L, Carrier M-E, Lefèvre-Colau M-M, Thombs B D, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Mouthon L, Nguyen C
Université de Paris, Faculté de Santé, UFR Médecine de Paris Centre, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75006, Paris, France.
AP-HP Centre-Université de Paris, Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l'Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Hôpital Cochin, 75014, Paris, France.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Oct;183(4):710-718. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18922. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) aimed at assessing people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have rarely involved the target population in the item- and domain-generation stage of the instrument construction.
To develop a new PROM assessing activities and participation in people with SSc.
A provisional International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based 65-item questionnaire previously developed from interviews of people with SSc was sent by email to all patients followed in the internal medicine department of Cochin hospital (n = 184) and enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort. Items were reduced according to their metric properties. Dimensional structure of the questionnaire was assessed by principal component analysis, convergent and divergent validities by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, internal consistency by Cronbach's α, and reliability by a test-retest method using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.
Overall, 113 of 184 patients (61·4%) completed the provisional questionnaire. The item-reduction process resulted in a 17-item questionnaire, the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale (CSF-17). Principal component analysis extracted two dimensions: 10 items related to mobility (CSF-17 section A) and seven items related to general tasks (CSF-17 section B). We observed convergent validity of the CSF-17 total score with global activity limitation, pain, depression and aesthetic burden, and divergent validity with anxiety. Cronbach's α was 0·94 for section A and 0·95 for section B. ICC (n = 25 patients) was 0·92 for the CSF-17 total score. Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal a systematic trend for the test-retest.
The CSF-17 is a new PROM assessing activities and participation specifically in people with SSc. Its content and construct validities are very high. What is already known about this topic? In the earliest stages of construction patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) rarely involve the target population. Instruments able to capture the specific needs of people with SSc in terms of activities and participation are lacking. What does this study add? The Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional Scale (CSF-17) is a new PROM assessing global activities and participation specifically in people with SSc. Patients' perspectives were prioritized at all stages of construction. What are the clinical implications of this work? The CSF-17 could be used in clinical practice and research to assess the efficacy of complex multidisciplinary interventions targeting activity limitations and participation restriction in people with SSc. Linked Comment: Clark and Denton. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:610.
旨在评估系统性硬化症(SSc)患者的患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)在工具构建的条目和领域生成阶段很少让目标人群参与。
开发一种新的PROM,用于评估SSc患者的活动和参与情况。
之前通过对SSc患者进行访谈开发的一份基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的65项临时问卷,通过电子邮件发送给科钦医院内科随访的所有患者(n = 184),这些患者均纳入了硬皮病患者中心干预网络队列。根据条目的计量学特性对条目进行删减。通过主成分分析评估问卷的维度结构,通过Spearman等级相关系数评估收敛效度和区分效度,通过Cronbach's α评估内部一致性,通过组内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析的重测法评估信度。
总体而言,184例患者中有113例(61.4%)完成了临时问卷。条目删减过程产生了一份17项问卷,即科钦17项硬皮病功能量表(CSF - 17)。主成分分析提取出两个维度:10项与活动能力相关(CSF - 17 A部分),7项与一般任务相关(CSF - 17 B部分)。我们观察到CSF - 17总分与总体活动受限、疼痛、抑郁和美观负担之间具有收敛效度,与焦虑之间具有区分效度。A部分的Cronbach's α为0.94,B部分为0.95。CSF - 17总分的ICC(n = 25例患者)为0.92。Bland - Altman分析未显示重测的系统趋势。
CSF - 17是一种新的PROM,专门用于评估SSc患者的活动和参与情况。其内容效度和结构效度非常高。关于该主题已知的信息有哪些?在系统性硬化症(SSc)患者报告结局(PROMs)构建的最初阶段很少让目标人群参与。缺乏能够捕捉SSc患者在活动和参与方面特定需求的工具。本研究增加了什么内容?科钦17项硬皮病功能量表(CSF - 17)是一种新的PROM,专门用于评估SSc患者的总体活动和参与情况。在构建的所有阶段都优先考虑了患者的观点。这项工作的临床意义是什么?CSF - 17可用于临床实践和研究,以评估针对SSc患者活动受限和参与受限的复杂多学科干预措施的疗效。相关评论:Clark和Denton。《英国皮肤病学杂志》2020年;183:610。