Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0195317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195317. eCollection 2018.
To evaluate the learnability and feasibility of a new technique comprising a needle-guidance-system (NGS) for ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture.
Using a randomized crossover study design, 24 medical students were asked to perform an ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture on a gel phantom using two different techniques that each included a paramedian insertion site. Procedure 1 (P1) used a pre-procedural ultrasound scan to predetermine the ideal insertion point. Procedure 2 (P2) applied a new technique comprising an NGS for performing real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture. Success rates and performance times for both procedures were compared. Participants were also asked to complete a post-study questionnaire, both to quantitatively assess the workload involved and state their personal preferences.
In comparison to the pre-procedural scan (P1), the NGS (P2) was associated with a significant increase in the number of successful punctures per participant (5 (P2) [interquartile range: 3.3-5.0] vs. 3 (P1) [interquartile range: 1.3-4.0], p = 0.005), and led to a significant reduction in performance time (118 seconds vs. 80.6 seconds, p < 0.001). In terms of workload perception, NGS use was associated with significantly better performances and lower frustration levels, as rated by students in the post-study questionnaire. Finally, 23/24 participants stated their preference for P2.
Our newly-developed technique for real-time ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture proved to be learnable and feasible for novices, and only required a small amount of training. The use of an NGS therefore has the potential to serve as a key feature of the ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture.
评估一种新的技术(包括一个用于超声辅助腰椎穿刺的针引导系统)的可学习性和可行性。
使用随机交叉研究设计,要求 24 名医学生使用两种不同的技术在凝胶模型上进行超声辅助腰椎穿刺,两种技术均包括旁正中入路。程序 1(P1)使用术前超声扫描预先确定理想的插入点。程序 2(P2)应用一种新的技术,包括一个用于实时超声引导腰椎穿刺的针引导系统。比较两种方法的成功率和操作时间。参与者还被要求完成一项研究后的问卷调查,以便定量评估所涉及的工作量并表达个人偏好。
与术前扫描(P1)相比,针引导系统(P2)与每个参与者的穿刺成功率显著增加有关(5(P2)[四分位距:3.3-5.0] vs. 3(P1)[四分位距:1.3-4.0],p = 0.005),并导致操作时间显著缩短(118 秒与 80.6 秒,p < 0.001)。就工作负荷感知而言,学生在研究后的问卷调查中评价,使用针引导系统与更好的表现和更低的挫败感水平相关。最后,23/24 名参与者表示更喜欢 P2。
我们新开发的实时超声引导腰椎穿刺技术对于新手来说是可学习和可行的,只需要少量的培训。因此,针引导系统有可能成为超声辅助腰椎穿刺的一个关键特征。