• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

袖带血压与收缩压放大的准确性。

Accuracy of cuff blood pressure and systolic blood pressure amplification.

机构信息

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2023 Aug;46(8):1961-1969. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01311-0. Epub 2023 May 22.

DOI:10.1038/s41440-023-01311-0
PMID:37217732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10404511/
Abstract

Automated cuff measured blood pressure (BP) is the global standard used for diagnosing hypertension, but there are concerns regarding the accuracy of the method. Individual variability in systolic BP (SBP) amplification from central (aorta) to peripheral (brachial) arteries could be related to the accuracy of cuff BP, but this has never been determined and was the aim of this study. Automated cuff BP and invasive brachial BP were recorded in 795 participants (74% male, aged 64 ± 11 years) receiving coronary angiography at five independent research sites (using seven different automated cuff BP devices). SBP amplification was recorded invasively by catheter and defined as brachial SBP minus aortic SBP. Compared with invasive brachial SBP, cuff SBP was significantly underestimated (130 ± 18 mmHg vs. 138 ± 22 mmHg, p < 0.001). The level of SBP amplification varied significantly among individuals (mean ± SD, 7.3 ± 9.1 mmHg) and was similar to level of difference between cuff and invasive brachial SBP (mean difference -7.6 ± 11.9 mmHg). SBP amplification explained most of the variance in accuracy of cuff SBP (R = 19%). The accuracy of cuff SBP was greatest among participants with the lowest SBP amplification (p < 0.001). After cuff BP values were corrected for SBP amplification, there was a significant improvement in the mean difference from the intra-arterial standard (p < 0.0001) and in the accuracy of hypertension classification according to 2017 ACC/AHA guideline thresholds (p = 0.005). The level of SBP amplification is a critical factor associated with the accuracy of conventional automated cuff measured BP.

摘要

自动袖带测量血压(BP)是全球用于诊断高血压的标准方法,但人们对该方法的准确性存在担忧。从中心(主动脉)到外周(肱动脉)动脉的收缩压(SBP)放大的个体差异可能与袖带 BP 的准确性有关,但这一点从未得到确定,也是本研究的目的。在五个独立的研究地点(使用七种不同的自动袖带 BP 设备),对接受冠状动脉造影的 795 名参与者(74%为男性,年龄 64±11 岁)同时记录自动袖带 BP 和有创肱动脉 BP。通过导管记录 SBP 放大值,定义为肱动脉 SBP 减去主动脉 SBP。与有创肱动脉 SBP 相比,袖带 SBP 明显低估(130±18mmHg 与 138±22mmHg,p<0.001)。个体之间的 SBP 放大水平差异显著(平均值±标准差,7.3±9.1mmHg),与袖带和有创肱动脉 SBP 之间的差异水平相似(平均差值-7.6±11.9mmHg)。SBP 放大解释了袖带 SBP 准确性的大部分差异(R=19%)。在 SBP 放大程度最低的参与者中,袖带 SBP 的准确性最高(p<0.001)。校正 SBP 放大后,袖带 BP 值与动脉内标准的平均差值显著改善(p<0.0001),根据 2017 年 ACC/AHA 指南阈值的高血压分类准确性也显著改善(p=0.005)。SBP 放大程度是与传统自动袖带测量 BP 准确性相关的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of cuff blood pressure and systolic blood pressure amplification.袖带血压与收缩压放大的准确性。
Hypertens Res. 2023 Aug;46(8):1961-1969. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01311-0. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Discovery of New Blood Pressure Phenotypes and Relation to Accuracy of Cuff Devices Used in Daily Clinical Practice.新血压表型的发现及其与日常临床实践中袖带设备准确性的关系。
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1239-1247. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10696. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
3
Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.使用Sphygmocor Xcel袖带装置测定中心血压测量准确性的验证研究。
Hypertension. 2020 Jul;76(1):244-250. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14916. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification.袖带式与有创收缩压放大的比较。
J Hypertens. 2022 Oct 1;40(10):2037-2044. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003228. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Intra-arterial analysis of the best calibration methods to estimate aortic blood pressure.经动脉分析评估主动脉血压的最佳校准方法。
J Hypertens. 2019 Feb;37(2):307-315. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001902.
6
Accuracy Difference of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurements by Sex and Height.性别和身高对无创血压测量准确性的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215513. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15513.
7
Comparison of invasive and brachial cuff-based noninvasive measurements for the assessment of blood pressure amplification.用于评估血压放大的有创测量与基于肱动脉袖带的无创测量的比较。
Hypertens Res. 2017 Mar;40(3):237-242. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.132. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Accuracy of Cuff-Measured Blood Pressure: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.袖带血压测量的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;70(5):572-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.064.
9
Inaccuracy of brachial blood pressure and its potential impact on treatment and aortic blood pressure estimation.肱动脉血压的不准确性及其对治疗和主动脉血压估计的潜在影响。
J Hypertens. 2021 Dec 1;39(12):2370-2378. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002943.
10
Evaluation of a brachial cuff and suprasystolic waveform algorithm method to noninvasively derive central blood pressure.评估一种臂部袖带和超收缩期波形算法方法以无创性得出中心血压。
Am J Hypertens. 2015 Apr;28(4):480-6. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu163. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Prevalent Hypertension by Aortic versus Brachial Blood Pressure Criteria for - A Pulse Wave Analysis Based Study from Adults of a City of West India.基于脉搏波分析的西印度某城市成年人主动脉血压与肱动脉血压标准下高血压患病率的比较研究
Niger Med J. 2025 Apr 3;66(1):109-116. doi: 10.71480/nmj.v66i1.616. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
2
The impact of sphygmomanometer placement and cuff placement on blood pressure measurements.血压计放置位置和袖带放置位置对血压测量的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 18;11:1388313. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388313. eCollection 2024.
3
Validation of a Suprasystolic Cuff System for Static and Dynamic Representation of the Central Pressure Waveform.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between cuff-based and invasive systolic blood pressure amplification.袖带式与有创收缩压放大的比较。
J Hypertens. 2022 Oct 1;40(10):2037-2044. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003228. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
2
Inaccuracy of brachial blood pressure and its potential impact on treatment and aortic blood pressure estimation.肱动脉血压的不准确性及其对治疗和主动脉血压估计的潜在影响。
J Hypertens. 2021 Dec 1;39(12):2370-2378. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002943.
3
The 2020 "WHO Technical Specifications for Automated Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measuring Devices With Cuff".
验证一种超收缩袖带系统,用于中央压力波形成静态和动态的表现。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 16;13(8):e033290. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033290. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2020 年“世界卫生组织自动无袖带血压测量设备技术规范”。
Hypertension. 2021 Mar 3;77(3):806-812. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16625. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
4
The impact of small to moderate inaccuracies in assessing blood pressure on hypertension prevalence and control rates.评估血压时小到中度的不准确对高血压患病率和控制率的影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 Jun;22(6):939-942. doi: 10.1111/jch.13915. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
The influence of SBP amplification on the accuracy of form-factor-derived mean arterial pressure.SBP 放大对源于形态因子的平均动脉压准确性的影响。
J Hypertens. 2020 Jun;38(6):1033-1039. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002385.
6
Formulas to Explain Popular Oscillometric Blood Pressure Estimation Algorithms.用于解释常用示波法血压估计算法的公式。
Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 21;10:1415. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01415. eCollection 2019.
7
São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020.《圣保罗高血压预防与控制行动呼吁:2020年》
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Dec;21(12):1744-1752. doi: 10.1111/jch.13741. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group.优化临床血压测量中观察者的表现:柳叶刀高血压委员会的立场声明。
J Hypertens. 2019 Sep;37(9):1737-1745. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002112.
9
Accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices: a critical need for improvement that could resolve discrepancy in hypertension guidelines.血压监测设备的准确性:亟待改进以解决高血压指南差异的关键需求。
J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Feb;33(2):89-93. doi: 10.1038/s41371-018-0122-6. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
10
Novel methods of testing and calibration of oscillometric blood pressure monitors.新型振荡血压计测试和校准方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 6;13(8):e0201123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201123. eCollection 2018.