Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Hypertens Res. 2023 Aug;46(8):1961-1969. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01311-0. Epub 2023 May 22.
Automated cuff measured blood pressure (BP) is the global standard used for diagnosing hypertension, but there are concerns regarding the accuracy of the method. Individual variability in systolic BP (SBP) amplification from central (aorta) to peripheral (brachial) arteries could be related to the accuracy of cuff BP, but this has never been determined and was the aim of this study. Automated cuff BP and invasive brachial BP were recorded in 795 participants (74% male, aged 64 ± 11 years) receiving coronary angiography at five independent research sites (using seven different automated cuff BP devices). SBP amplification was recorded invasively by catheter and defined as brachial SBP minus aortic SBP. Compared with invasive brachial SBP, cuff SBP was significantly underestimated (130 ± 18 mmHg vs. 138 ± 22 mmHg, p < 0.001). The level of SBP amplification varied significantly among individuals (mean ± SD, 7.3 ± 9.1 mmHg) and was similar to level of difference between cuff and invasive brachial SBP (mean difference -7.6 ± 11.9 mmHg). SBP amplification explained most of the variance in accuracy of cuff SBP (R = 19%). The accuracy of cuff SBP was greatest among participants with the lowest SBP amplification (p < 0.001). After cuff BP values were corrected for SBP amplification, there was a significant improvement in the mean difference from the intra-arterial standard (p < 0.0001) and in the accuracy of hypertension classification according to 2017 ACC/AHA guideline thresholds (p = 0.005). The level of SBP amplification is a critical factor associated with the accuracy of conventional automated cuff measured BP.
自动袖带测量血压(BP)是全球用于诊断高血压的标准方法,但人们对该方法的准确性存在担忧。从中心(主动脉)到外周(肱动脉)动脉的收缩压(SBP)放大的个体差异可能与袖带 BP 的准确性有关,但这一点从未得到确定,也是本研究的目的。在五个独立的研究地点(使用七种不同的自动袖带 BP 设备),对接受冠状动脉造影的 795 名参与者(74%为男性,年龄 64±11 岁)同时记录自动袖带 BP 和有创肱动脉 BP。通过导管记录 SBP 放大值,定义为肱动脉 SBP 减去主动脉 SBP。与有创肱动脉 SBP 相比,袖带 SBP 明显低估(130±18mmHg 与 138±22mmHg,p<0.001)。个体之间的 SBP 放大水平差异显著(平均值±标准差,7.3±9.1mmHg),与袖带和有创肱动脉 SBP 之间的差异水平相似(平均差值-7.6±11.9mmHg)。SBP 放大解释了袖带 SBP 准确性的大部分差异(R=19%)。在 SBP 放大程度最低的参与者中,袖带 SBP 的准确性最高(p<0.001)。校正 SBP 放大后,袖带 BP 值与动脉内标准的平均差值显著改善(p<0.0001),根据 2017 年 ACC/AHA 指南阈值的高血压分类准确性也显著改善(p=0.005)。SBP 放大程度是与传统自动袖带测量 BP 准确性相关的关键因素。