Hunt Shanda L, Bakker Caitlin J
Health Sciences Libraries, University of Minnesota, 305 Diehl Hall, 505 Essex Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Health Sciences Libraries, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):184-197. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.316. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
The University of Minnesota (UMN) Health Sciences Libraries conducted a needs assessment of public health researchers as part of a multi-institutional study led by Ithaka S+R. The aims of the study were to capture the evolving needs, opportunities, and challenges of public health researchers in the current environment and provide actionable recommendations. This paper reports on the data collected at the UMN site.
Participants (n=24) were recruited through convenience sampling. One-on-one interviews, held November 2016 to January 2017, were audio-recorded. Qualitative analyses were conducted using NVivo 11 Pro and were based on the principles of grounded theory.
The data revealed that a broad range of skill levels among participants (e.g., literature searching) and areas of misunderstanding (e.g., current publishing landscape, open access options). Overall, data management was an afterthought. Few participants were fully aware of the breadth of librarian knowledge and skill sets, although many did express a desire for further skill development in information science.
Libraries can engage more public health researchers by utilizing targeted and individualized marketing regarding services. We can promote open science by educating researchers on publication realities and enhancing our data visualization skills. Libraries might take an institution-wide leadership role on matters of data management and data policy compliance. Finally, as team science emerges as a research priority, we can offer our networking expertise. These support services may reduce the stresses that public health researchers feel in the current research environment.
明尼苏达大学(UMN)健康科学图书馆开展了一项针对公共卫生研究人员的需求评估,作为由伊萨卡S+R牵头的多机构研究的一部分。该研究的目的是了解当前环境下公共卫生研究人员不断变化的需求、机遇和挑战,并提供可付诸行动的建议。本文报告了在明尼苏达大学校园收集的数据。
通过便利抽样招募参与者(n=24)。2016年11月至2017年1月进行了一对一访谈,并进行了录音。使用NVivo 11 Pro进行定性分析,分析基于扎根理论原则。
数据显示,参与者在广泛的技能水平(如文献检索)和误解领域(如当前的出版格局、开放获取选项)存在差异。总体而言,数据管理是事后才考虑的事情。很少有参与者充分了解图书馆员知识和技能的广度,尽管许多人确实表示希望在信息科学方面进一步发展技能。
图书馆可以通过针对服务进行有针对性的个性化营销,吸引更多公共卫生研究人员。我们可以通过教育研究人员了解出版实际情况并提高我们的数据可视化技能来促进开放科学。图书馆可以在数据管理和数据政策合规方面发挥全机构的领导作用。最后,随着团队科学成为研究重点,我们可以提供我们的网络专业知识。这些支持服务可能会减轻公共卫生研究人员在当前研究环境中感受到的压力。