Wolff Andrew B, Hogan Geoffrey W, Capon James M, Napoli Alexandra M, Smith Hayden J, Gaspar Patrick S
Washington Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 5215 Loughboro Road NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Reston Anesthesia Associates, 1850 Town Center Pkwy, Reston, VA 20190, USA.
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Jul 13;3(4):338-345. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnw021. eCollection 2016 Oct.
The objective of this study is to retrospectively examine the effects of pre-operative fascia iliaca (FI) and lumbar plexus (LPB) nerve blocks on post-operative pain and secondary post-operative variables following arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Subjects undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the hip received one of three pre-operative anesthetic techniques; general anesthesia only, general anesthesia with FI or general anesthesia with LPB. Patient reported pain scores (0-10) were recorded at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary variables examined include time spent in the PACU, morphine equivalent administered, presence of nausea, persistent numbness, parasthesia, weakness, increased narcotic usage for rebound pain, ED visits and hospital admissions. The mean pain scores over all time points were significantly lower in the LPB group (2.38) than the FI group (4.08, <0.001) and the Gen group (3.55, <0.001). Patients receiving a lumbar plexus block exhibited significantly decreased pain at = 0 (=0.019), = 30 (=0.038), = 60 (=0.013), = 90 (=0.017) and = 120 (=0.001) after admission to PACU. The FI group showed no improvement in any post-operative variable when compared with general anesthesia alone. There was no difference in the time to discharge or in morphine equivalent administered between groups. One patient receiving a lumbar plexus block experienced a seizure lasting about 10 s. However, there were no medium or long-term complications. Lumbar plexus block administered in concert with general anesthesia provides clinically important and statistically significant post-operative pain relief when compared with general anesthesia alone or general anesthesia plus fascia iliaca block.
本研究的目的是回顾性研究术前髂筋膜(FI)阻滞和腰丛(LPB)阻滞对髋关节镜手术后疼痛及术后继发变量的影响。接受髋关节镜手术的受试者接受三种术前麻醉技术之一:单纯全身麻醉、全身麻醉联合FI阻滞或全身麻醉联合LPB阻滞。在进入麻醉后恢复室(PACU)后0、30、60、90和120分钟记录患者报告的疼痛评分(0 - 10分)。所检查的继发变量包括在PACU的停留时间、给予的吗啡当量、恶心的存在、持续性麻木、感觉异常、虚弱、因反弹痛而增加的麻醉剂使用量、急诊就诊次数和住院次数。LPB组在所有时间点的平均疼痛评分(2.38)显著低于FI组(4.08,<0.001)和单纯全身麻醉组(Gen组,3.55,<0.001)。接受腰丛阻滞的患者在进入PACU后0(P = 0.019)、30(P = 0.038)、60(P = 0.013)、90(P = 0.017)和120(P = 0.001)分钟时疼痛显著减轻。与单纯全身麻醉相比,FI组在任何术后变量方面均无改善。各组之间在出院时间或给予的吗啡当量方面没有差异。一名接受腰丛阻滞的患者发生了持续约10秒的癫痫发作。然而,没有中、长期并发症。与单纯全身麻醉或全身麻醉加髂筋膜阻滞相比,全身麻醉联合腰丛阻滞可提供具有临床重要性且在统计学上有显著意义的术后疼痛缓解。