Mittelstädt Anke, Reitberger Helena, Fleischmann Julia, Elshafei Moustafa, Brunner Maximilian, Anthuber Anna, Krautz Christian, Lucio Marianna, Merkel Susanne, Grützmann Robert, Weber Georg F
From the Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Medicine, Clinic Northwest, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Sep 7;3(3):e195. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000195. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Anastomotic leakage (AL) and stenosis (AS) are two of the most severe postoperative complications after total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy. The stapler diameter can be chosen by the surgeon. Therefore, this study aims to assess the correlation between the stapler size as main independent variable as well as other different risk factors and AL and AS.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 356 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy between 2000 and 2018, mostly due to gastric cancer (96.9%). After propensity score matching the outcome parameters AL and AS were compared between the two stapler size groups. We also assessed different risk factors for AL and AS in cancer patients using multivariate analysis.
Small circular stapler diameter (21/25 mm; n = 147 vs 28/29/31 mm; n = 209) was identified as a significant risk factor for the occurrence of AL (10% vs 4% for smaller vs larger staplers; = 0.042). In multivariate analysis for the occurrence of AL an ASA score ≥ 3 could be identified as a risk factor (OR 2.85; 95% CI = 1.13-7.15; = 0.026). Additionally, smaller stapler size could be identified as a risk factor for AS (OR small 1.00, OR large 0.24; 95% CI: 0.06-0.97; = 0.045). AL was associated with lower survival (18.1 vs 38.16 months; = 0.0119).
The application of a larger circular stapler for esophagojejunostomy in open total gastrectomy shows significantly lower rates of AL and stenosis. Therefore, the largest possible stapler diameter should be applied.
吻合口漏(AL)和狭窄(AS)是全胃切除食管空肠吻合术后最严重的两种术后并发症。外科医生可以选择吻合器的直径。因此,本研究旨在评估作为主要自变量的吻合器尺寸以及其他不同风险因素与AL和AS之间的相关性。
我们对2000年至2018年间接受开放全胃切除术的356例患者的数据进行了回顾性分析,这些患者大多因胃癌(96.9%)接受手术。在进行倾向评分匹配后,比较了两个吻合器尺寸组之间的结局参数AL和AS。我们还使用多变量分析评估了癌症患者发生AL和AS的不同风险因素。
小圆形吻合器直径(21/25毫米;n = 147对比28/29/31毫米;n = 209)被确定为发生AL的一个显著风险因素(较小吻合器组为10%,较大吻合器组为4%;P = 0.042)。在AL发生情况的多变量分析中,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分≥3可被确定为一个风险因素(比值比2.85;95%置信区间 = 1.13 - 7.15;P = 0.026)。此外,较小的吻合器尺寸可被确定为AS的一个风险因素(小尺寸比值比1.00,大尺寸比值比0.24;95%置信区间:0.06 - 0.97;P = 0.045)。AL与较低的生存率相关(18.1对比38.16个月;P = 0.0119)。
在开放全胃切除术中,应用较大的圆形吻合器进行食管空肠吻合术显示AL和狭窄的发生率显著降低。因此,应使用尽可能大的吻合器直径。