• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险操作框架:保障患者安全的实用方法。

A framework for operationalizing risk: A practical approach to patient safety.

作者信息

Mathews Simon C, Sutcliffe Kathleen M, Garrett Margaret R, Pronovost Peter J, Paine Lori

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Johns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Jul;38(1):38-46. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21317. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1002/jhrm.21317
PMID:29633476
Abstract

The importance of patient safety has grown tremendously; however, there are insufficient resources dedicated to its practical application. We provide an overview of the framework for addressing patient safety within the Johns Hopkins Health System, which approaches patient safety in the context of risk at the patient, provider, unit, and system levels. We present practical examples of how this approach is applied and highlight the resources needed as well as describe how it fits within the broader quality management infrastructure in the health system on its journey toward high reliability.

摘要

患者安全的重要性已大幅提升;然而,用于其实际应用的资源却不足。我们概述了约翰霍普金斯医疗系统中解决患者安全问题的框架,该框架在患者、医护人员、科室和系统层面的风险背景下处理患者安全问题。我们给出了这种方法如何应用的实际例子,强调所需资源,并描述它如何融入医疗系统朝着高可靠性发展的更广泛质量管理体系之中。

相似文献

1
A framework for operationalizing risk: A practical approach to patient safety.风险操作框架:保障患者安全的实用方法。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Jul;38(1):38-46. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21317. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
A Department of Medicine Infrastructure for Patient Safety and Clinical Quality Improvement.一个用于患者安全和临床质量改进的医学部基础设施。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):413-419. doi: 10.1177/1062860617743324. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Darzi calls for overhaul of safety incident reporting.达齐呼吁对安全事故报告进行全面改革。
BMJ. 2016 Mar 9;352:i1434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1434.
4
Learning from excellence in healthcare: a new approach to incident reporting.从卓越医疗中学习:事件报告的新方法。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 Sep;101(9):788-91. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310021. Epub 2016 May 4.
5
Re: Reporting and Using Near-Miss Events to Improve Patient Safety in Diverse Primary Care Practices: A Collaborative Approach to Learning from Our Mistakes.主题:报告及利用医疗差错未遂事件提升多元化基层医疗实践中的患者安全:从错误中学习的协作方法
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):165. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150286.
6
A Model for the Departmental Quality Management Infrastructure Within an Academic Health System.学术健康系统内部门质量管理基础设施模型
Acad Med. 2017 May;92(5):608-613. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001380.
7
Unprocessed tray incident prompts investigation, leads to process improvements.未处理的托盘事件引发调查,带来流程改进。
OR Manager. 2013 Jul;29(7):16-7.
8
Improving patient safety through the introduction of a formal triage process.通过引入正式的分诊流程提高患者安全。
Emerg Nurse. 2017 Feb 10;24(9):19-25. doi: 10.7748/en.2017.e1647.
9
Managing the risks of sepsis in pregnancy.妊娠脓毒症的风险管理。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Aug;27(4):583-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
10
E-learning on risk management. An opportunity for sharing knowledge and experiences in patient safety.风险管理的电子学习。在患者安全方面分享知识和经验的机会。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Oct 31;31(8):639-646. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy223.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework to support risk assessment in hospitals.支持医院风险评估的框架。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Jun 1;31(5):393-401. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy194.