• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持医院风险评估的框架。

A framework to support risk assessment in hospitals.

机构信息

Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Jun 1;31(5):393-401. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy194.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzy194
PMID:30184151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6528703/
Abstract

QUALITY PROBLEM OR ISSUE

A number of challenges have been identified with current risk assessment practice in hospitals, including: a lack of consultation with a sufficiently wide group of stakeholders; a lack of consistency and transparency; and insufficient risk assessment guidance. Consequently, risk assessment may not be fully effective as a means to ensure safety.

INITIAL ASSESSMENT

We used a V system developmental model, in conjunction with mixed methods, including interviews and document analysis to identify user needs and requirements.

CHOICE OF SOLUTION

One way to address current challenges is through providing good guidance on the fundamental aspects of risk assessment. We designed a risk assessment framework, comprising: a risk assessment model that depicts the main risk assessment steps; risk assessment explanation cards that provide prompts to help apply each step; and a risk assessment form that helps to systematize the risk assessment and document the findings.

IMPLEMENTATION

We conducted multiple group discussions to pilot the framework through the use of a representative scenario and used our findings for the user evaluation.

EVALUATION

User evaluation was conducted with 10 participants through interviews and showed promising results.

LESSONS LEARNED

While the framework was recommended for use in practice, it was also proposed that it be adopted as a training tool. With its use in risk assessment, we anticipate that risk assessments would lead to more effective decisions being made and more appropriate actions being taken to minimize risks. Consequently, the quality and safety of care delivered could be improved.

摘要

质量问题或议题

当前医院的风险评估实践存在诸多挑战,包括:没有与足够广泛的利益相关者进行协商;缺乏一致性和透明度;以及风险评估指南不足。因此,风险评估可能无法作为确保安全的充分手段。

初步评估

我们使用 V 系统开发模型,结合混合方法,包括访谈和文件分析,以确定用户的需求和要求。

解决方案选择

解决当前挑战的一种方法是提供关于风险评估基本方面的良好指导。我们设计了一个风险评估框架,包括:一个描绘主要风险评估步骤的风险评估模型;提供提示以帮助应用每个步骤的风险评估说明卡;以及帮助系统化风险评估并记录发现的风险评估表。

实施

我们通过使用代表性场景进行了多次小组讨论来试行该框架,并将我们的发现用于用户评估。

评估

通过访谈对 10 名参与者进行了用户评估,结果令人鼓舞。

经验教训

虽然该框架被推荐用于实际应用,但也建议将其作为培训工具采用。通过在风险评估中的使用,我们预计风险评估将导致更有效的决策,并采取更适当的行动来最小化风险。因此,可以提高所提供护理的质量和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/eb20b268710c/mzy194f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/fe17e4a3ce39/mzy194f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/1d55cffc5dfd/mzy194f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/eb20b268710c/mzy194f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/fe17e4a3ce39/mzy194f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/1d55cffc5dfd/mzy194f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08af/6528703/eb20b268710c/mzy194f03.jpg

相似文献

1
A framework to support risk assessment in hospitals.支持医院风险评估的框架。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Jun 1;31(5):393-401. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy194.
2
A Review of Risk Matrices Used in Acute Hospitals in England.英格兰急性医院使用的风险矩阵述评。
Risk Anal. 2019 May;39(5):1060-1070. doi: 10.1111/risa.13221. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
7
Trust-level risk evaluation and risk control guidance in the NHS East of England.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)东英格兰地区的信任级别风险评估与风险控制指南
Risk Anal. 2014 Aug;34(8):1469-81. doi: 10.1111/risa.12159. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
9
Guidetomeasure-OT: A mobile 3D application to improve the accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of clinician-led home-based falls-risk assessments.用于测量本体感觉的工具(Measure-OT):一款用于提高临床医生主导的居家跌倒风险评估的准确性、一致性和效率的移动 3D 应用程序。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:349-365. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
10
Enabling older adults to carry out paperless falls-risk self-assessments using guidetomeasure-3D: A mixed methods study.使用 GuideToMeasure-3D 使老年人能够进行无纸化跌倒风险自我评估:一项混合方法研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Apr;92:103135. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103135. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Description of Core Performance Measures and Indicators of Patient Safety Used by Select Government and Private Hospitals in the Philippines.菲律宾部分政府和私立医院使用的患者安全核心绩效指标及措施说明。
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Jan 26;58(1):15-24. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6931. eCollection 2024.
2
Making Our Hospitals a Safe Workplace: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment at a Tertiary-Level Public Hospital in Eastern India.让我们的医院成为安全的工作场所:印度东部一家三级公立医院的危害识别与风险评估
Cureus. 2024 Apr 26;16(4):e59110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59110. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Worker Protection Scenarios for General Analytical Testing Facility under Several Infection Propagation Risks: Scoping Review, Epidemiological Model and ISO 31000.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the association of alerts from a national mortality surveillance system with subsequent hospital mortality in England: an interrupted time series analysis.调查全国死亡率监测系统警报与随后英格兰医院死亡率之间的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec;27(12):965-973. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007495. Epub 2018 May 4.
2
A framework for operationalizing risk: A practical approach to patient safety.风险操作框架:保障患者安全的实用方法。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Jul;38(1):38-46. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21317. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
Latent risk assessment tool for health care leaders.
一般分析测试设施在几种感染传播风险下的工人防护方案:范围界定综述、流行病学模型和 ISO 31000。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 22;19(19):12001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912001.
4
Failure modes and effects analysis for surface-guided DIBH breast radiotherapy.表面引导的深吸气屏气(DIBH)乳腺癌放疗失效模式与效应分析。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Apr;23(4):e13541. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13541. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
5
Establishing a risk assessment framework for point-of-care ultrasound.建立即时超声风险评估框架。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Apr;181(4):1449-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04324-4. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
6
Risk management of vaginal birth after cesarean section (Review).剖宫产术后阴道分娩的风险管理(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Oct;22(4):1111. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10545. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
7
Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice.在临床实践中使用标准化和非标准化工具测量跌倒风险和独立性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 20;18(6):3226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063226.
8
Adoption of a Data-Driven Bayesian Belief Network Investigating Organizational Factors that Influence Patient Safety.采用数据驱动的贝叶斯信念网络调查影响患者安全的组织因素。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jun;42(6):1277-1293. doi: 10.1111/risa.13610. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
医疗保健领导者的潜在风险评估工具。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Oct;38(2):36-46. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21316. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
4
Design for patient safety: a systems-based risk identification framework.患者安全设计:基于系统的风险识别框架
Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1046-1064. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1437224. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
The problem with root cause analysis.根本原因分析的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):417-422. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
A Systems Approach to Analyzing and Preventing Hospital Adverse Events.一种分析和预防医院不良事件的系统方法。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Jun;16(2):162-167. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000263.
8
Fifteen years after To Err is Human: a success story to learn from.《人非圣贤,孰能无过》发表十五年后:一个值得借鉴的成功故事。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):396-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004720. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Fault Tree Analysis.故障树分析
Am J Med Qual. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):80-86. doi: 10.1177/1062860615614944. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
10
Trust-level risk identification guidance in the NHS East of England.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)东英格兰地区的信任级别风险识别指南。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27(2):67-76. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150651.