Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
CHIP, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Apr;21 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):e25052. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25052.
The first World Health Organization (WHO) global health sector strategy on hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) has called for the elimination of viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030. This study assesses policies and programmes in support of elimination efforts as reported by patient groups in Europe.
In 2016 and 2017, hepatitis patient groups in 25 European countries participated in a cross-sectional survey about their countries' policy responses to HBV and HCV. The English-language survey addressed overall national response; public awareness/engagement; disease monitoring; prevention; testing/diagnosis; clinical assessment; and treatment. We performed a descriptive analysis of data and compared 2016 and 2017 findings.
In 2017, 72% and 52% of the 25 European study countries were reported to not have national HBV and HCV strategies respectively. The number of respondents indicating that their governments collaborated with civil society on viral hepatitis control increased from 13 in 2016 to 18 in 2017. In both 2016 and 2017, patient groups reported that 9 countries (36%) have disease registers for HBV and 11 (44%) have disease registers for HCV. The number of countries reported to have needle and syringe exchange programmes available in all parts of the country dropped from 10 (40%) in 2016 to 8 in 2017 (32%). In both 2016 and 2017, patient groups in 5 countries (20%) reported that HCV treatment is available in non-hospital settings. From 2016 to 2017, the reported number of countries with no restrictions on access to direct-acting antivirals for HCV increased from 3 (12%) to 7 (28%), and 5 fewer countries were reported to refuse treatment to people who are currently injecting drugs.
The patient-led Hep-CORE study offers a unique perspective on the readiness of study countries to undertake comprehensive viral hepatitis elimination efforts. Viral hepatitis monitoring should be expanded to address policy issues more comprehensively and to incorporate civil society perspectives, as is the case with global HIV monitoring. Policy components should also be explicitly added to the WHO framework for monitoring country-level progress against viral hepatitis.
世界卫生组织(WHO)的首个全球乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎病毒(HBV 和 HCV)卫生部门战略呼吁到 2030 年消除乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎作为主要公共卫生威胁。本研究评估了欧洲患者群体报告的支持消除努力的政策和方案。
2016 年和 2017 年,欧洲 25 个国家的肝炎患者群体参与了一项横断面调查,了解其国家对 HBV 和 HCV 的政策反应。英语调查涵盖了国家整体反应、公众意识/参与、疾病监测、预防、检测/诊断、临床评估和治疗。我们对数据进行了描述性分析,并比较了 2016 年和 2017 年的调查结果。
2017 年,报告称 25 个欧洲研究国家中分别有 72%和 52%没有国家 HBV 和 HCV 战略。表示政府与民间社会就病毒性肝炎控制进行合作的受访者人数从 2016 年的 13 人增加到 2017 年的 18 人。在 2016 年和 2017 年,患者群体报告称,9 个国家(36%)有 HBV 疾病登记册,11 个国家(44%)有 HCV 疾病登记册。报告称全国所有地区都有针头和注射器交换计划的国家数量从 2016 年的 10 个(40%)减少到 2017 年的 8 个(32%)。在 2016 年和 2017 年,5 个国家(20%)的患者群体报告称 HCV 治疗可在非医院环境中进行。从 2016 年到 2017 年,报告称对 HCV 没有直接作用抗病毒药物的获取没有限制的国家数量从 3 个(12%)增加到 7 个(28%),并且报告的拒绝为目前正在注射毒品的人提供治疗的国家减少了 5 个。
以患者为中心的 Hep-CORE 研究为研究国家开展全面消除病毒性肝炎努力的准备情况提供了独特的视角。应扩大病毒性肝炎监测范围,以更全面地解决政策问题,并纳入民间社会的观点,就像全球艾滋病毒监测一样。还应将政策组成部分明确添加到世卫组织监测国家一级消除病毒性肝炎进展的框架中。