Comment to the reply letter: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).
作者信息
Walter S D, Macaskill Petra, Turner Robin, Guyatt Gordon, Cook Richard, Prasad Kameshwar
机构信息
1 Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
2 School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
出版信息
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1603. doi: 10.1177/0962280218768107. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
PMID:29633654
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comment to the reply letter: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).对回复信的评论：致编辑的信：用于比较效果研究的偏好选项随机设计（PORD）：检验比较效果、偏好效果、选择效果、意向性治疗效果和总体效果的统计功效（《脊柱畸形与脊髓损伤杂志》，第28卷，第2期，2019年）
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1603. doi: 10.1177/0962280218768107. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Authors' reply: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).作者回复：致编辑的信：用于比较效果研究的偏好选项随机设计（PORD）：检验比较效果、偏好效果、选择效果、意向性治疗效果和总体效果的统计功效（《脊柱畸形与相关研究》，第28卷，第2期，2019年）
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1600-1602. doi: 10.1177/0962280218767707. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).致编辑的信：用于比较效果研究的偏好选项随机设计（PORD）：检验比较效果、偏好效果、选择效果、意向性分析效果和总体效果的统计功效（《脊柱畸形与相关研究》，第28卷，第2期，2019年）
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1597-1598. doi: 10.1177/0962280218767691. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
4
Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect.偏好选项随机设计（PORD）在比较有效性研究中的应用：用于检验比较效果、偏好效果、选择效果、意向治疗效果和总体效果的统计功效。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):626-640. doi: 10.1177/0962280217734584. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Authors' reply: Letter to the Editor: Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies (SMMR, Vol 27, Issue 6, 2018).
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):323-324. doi: 10.1177/0962280218811186. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
Letter to the Editor: Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies (SMMR, Vol. 27, Issue 6, 2018).致编辑的信：药物疗效研究中处理时间依赖性混杂因素的统计方法比较（《社会医学与卫生事业管理研究》，第27卷，第6期，2018年）
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):321-322. doi: 10.1177/0962280218811177. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
7
Can We Trust Knee Meniscus Studies? One-Way Crossover Confounds Intent-to-Treat Statistical Methods.我们能信任膝关节半月板研究吗？单向交叉混淆了意向性分析统计方法。
Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2187-2190. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.009.
8
Challenges of Non-Intention-to-Treat Analyses.非意向性治疗分析的挑战。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):145-146. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19192.
9
On the prevention and analysis of missing data in randomized clinical trials: the state of the art.随机临床试验中缺失数据的预防和分析：现状。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):80-4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00273.
10
Randomized Controlled Trials 7: On Contamination and Estimating the Actual Treatment Effect.随机对照试验 7：关于污染和估计实际治疗效果。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:307-318. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_17.
Zotero 插件