Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Menopause. 2018 Jul;25(7):783-788. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001086.
The aim of the present study was to analyze balance ability and posture in postmenopausal women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).
This study includes a sample of 48 women with CPP recruited from the Gynecology Service of Virgen de las Nieves and San Cecilio Hospitals in Granada (Spain) and 48 healthy control women matched with respect to age and anthropometric characteristics. Outcome variables collected included: balance ability (Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test and Timed Up an Go Test) and posture (photogrammetry and Spinal Mouse).
Significant differences were found in all Mini Best Test subscales: total (P < 0.001), anticipatory (P = 0.002), reactive postural control (P < 0.001), sensory orientation (P < 0.001), and dynamic gait (P < 0.001), and all Timed Up and Go test subscales: alone (P < 0.001), with manual (P = 0.002) and cognitive task (P = 0.030). Significant differences were also found on spinal cervical angles with a forward head posture in women with CPP; global spine alignment exhibited more deviation in the women with CPP (P < 0.001); and a higher percentage of women with CPP (58%) presented with increased thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Cohen's d was used to calculate the effect size. Some subscales of balance and posture tests showed a large effect size (d ≥0.8), indicating a more consistent result.
Women with CPP presented poor balance including anticipatory, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic gait, and dual task-related conditions. Posture showed higher values on the dorsal angle and lower sacral inclination, less spine alignment, and a more prevalent posture with increased kyphosis and lumbar lordosis.
本研究旨在分析慢性盆腔痛(CPP)绝经后妇女的平衡能力和姿势。
本研究纳入了来自西班牙格拉纳达的 Virgen de las Nieves 和 San Cecilio 医院妇科的 48 例 CPP 女性患者和 48 例年龄和人体测量特征匹配的健康对照组女性。收集的结果变量包括:平衡能力(Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test 和 Timed Up and Go Test)和姿势(摄影和 Spinal Mouse)。
在所有 Mini Best Test 子量表中均存在显著差异:总得分(P<0.001)、预期(P=0.002)、反应性姿势控制(P<0.001)、感觉定向(P<0.001)和动态步态(P<0.001),以及所有 Timed Up and Go test 子量表:单独(P<0.001)、使用手(P=0.002)和认知任务(P=0.030)。CPP 妇女的颈椎角和前伸头位也存在显著差异;整体脊柱排列在 CPP 妇女中表现出更大的偏差(P<0.001);并且更多的 CPP 妇女(58%)表现出胸椎后凸和腰椎前凸增加。使用 Cohen's d 计算效应大小。一些平衡和姿势测试的子量表显示出较大的效应量(d≥0.8),表明结果更一致。
CPP 妇女的平衡能力较差,包括预期、反应性姿势控制、感觉定向、动态步态和双重任务相关条件。姿势表现为背角较高、骶骨倾斜度较低、脊柱排列较差、后凸和腰椎前凸增加的姿势更为普遍。