Graduate Institute of Neural & Cognitive Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 10;13(4):e0195020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195020. eCollection 2018.
Previous studies examining the other-race effect in school-age children mostly focused on recognition memory performance. Here we investigated perceptual discriminability for Asian-like versus Caucasian-like morph faces in school-age Taiwanese children and adults. One-hundred-and-two 5- to 12-year-old children and twenty-three adults performed a sequential same/different face matching task, where they viewed an Asian- or a Caucasian-parent face followed by either the same parent face or a different morphed face (containing 15%, 30%, 45%, or 60% contribution from the other parent face) and judged if the two faces looked the same. We computed the d' as the sensitivity index for each age groups. We also analyzed the group mean rejection rates as a function of the morph level and fitted with a cumulative normal distribution function. Results showed that the adults and the oldest 11-12-year-old children exhibited a greater sensitivity (d') and a smaller discrimination threshold (μ) in the Asian-parent condition than those in the Caucasian-parent condition, indicating the presence of an own-race advantage. On the contrary, 5- to 10-year-old children showed an equal sensitivity and similar discrimination thresholds for both conditions, indicating an absence of the own-race advantage. Moreover, a gradual development in enhancing the discriminability for the Asian-parent condition was observed from age 5 to 12; however, the progression in the Caucasian-parent condition was less apparent. In sum, our findings suggest that expertise in face processing may take the entire childhood to develop, and supports the perceptual learning view of the other-race effect-the own-race advantage seen in adulthood likely reflects a result of prolonged learning specific to faces most commonly seen in one's visual environment such as own-race faces.
先前研究检查了儿童期的异族效应,主要集中在识别记忆表现上。在这里,我们研究了台湾学龄儿童和成人对亚洲人和白种人样面孔的感知辨别力。102 名 5 至 12 岁的儿童和 23 名成年人进行了连续相同/不同面孔匹配任务,他们观看了亚洲或白种人父母的面孔,然后观看了相同的父母面孔或不同的变形面孔(包含 15%、30%、45%或 60%来自另一位父母的面孔),并判断两张面孔是否看起来相同。我们计算了每个年龄组的 d'作为敏感性指标。我们还分析了组平均拒绝率作为变形水平的函数,并拟合了累积正态分布函数。结果表明,成年人和最大的 11-12 岁儿童在亚洲父母条件下表现出比白种人父母条件下更高的敏感性(d')和更小的辨别阈值(μ),表明存在本族优势。相反,5-10 岁的儿童在两种条件下表现出相同的敏感性和相似的辨别阈值,表明不存在本族优势。此外,从 5 岁到 12 岁,观察到增强对亚洲父母条件的辨别力的逐渐发展;然而,在白种人父母条件下的进展不太明显。总之,我们的发现表明,面部处理的专业知识可能需要整个童年才能发展,并支持异族效应的知觉学习观点——成年人中看到的本族优势可能反映了对最常见于自己视觉环境中的面孔(如本族面孔)的特定学习的长期结果。