Venkatesh Samantha, Maymone Mayra Bc, Vashi Neelam A
Boston University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dermatol Online J. 2018 Mar 15;24(3):13030/qt9h60v8r6.
This commentary considers the reasons for rejection of manuscripts during the peer-review process. Poor methodology, inappropriate statistical analysis, irrelevance, and technical errors are cited frequently as motives for manuscript rejection. Guidance, such as selecting an applicable journal, conducting a rigorous study, and writing efficiently, is provided for authors to prevent initial rejection. Researchers are reassured that rejection is a common consequence of peer-review and subsequent submissions to other journals are often successful publications.
本评论探讨了同行评审过程中稿件被拒的原因。方法不当、统计分析不恰当、内容不相关以及技术错误经常被列为稿件被拒的原因。为防止稿件被初步拒稿，为作者提供了一些指导，如选择合适的期刊、进行严谨的研究以及高效写作。研究人员得到保证，拒稿是同行评审的常见结果，随后向其他期刊投稿往往会成功发表。
