Systematization of peer review in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde.
作者信息
Silva Marcus Tolentino, Galvão Taís Freire
机构信息
Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
出版信息
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2024 Dec 13;33:e20241001. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20241001.en.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Systematization of peer review in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde.《流行病学与卫生服务》同行评审的系统化
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2024 Dec 13;33:e20241001. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20241001.en.
2
Assessment in the primary care of the State of São Paulo, Brazil: incipient actions in sexual and reproductive health.巴西圣保罗州初级保健评估：性健康和生殖健康方面的初步行动。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Aug 17;51:77. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006711.
3
Editorial improvement in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde in 2024.《流行病学与卫生服务》2024年的编辑改进。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2024 Dec 13;33:e20241002. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20241002.en.
4
Epidemiology and Health Services (Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde) journal, its role and contributions in the pandemic context.《流行病学与卫生服务》（Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde）杂志及其在疫情背景下的作用与贡献。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021 Nov 26;30(4):e2021035. doi: 10.1590/S1679-497420210004000022.
5
Systematic reviews and other types of synthesis: commentary on the methodological series published in Epidemiology and Health Services Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde.系统评价及其他类型的综合分析：对发表于《流行病学与卫生服务流行病学》的方法学系列文章的评论
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2022 Dec 19;31(3):e2022422. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222022000300023.
6
Geographic accessibility to cancer treatment in Brazil: A network analysis.巴西癌症治疗的地理可及性：一项网络分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Dec 23;7:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100153. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Health care for women in situations of violence: discoordination of network professionals.遭受暴力妇女的医疗保健：网络专业人员的不协调。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017 Apr 3;51:e03207. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2016113303207.
8
Use of and access to health services in Brazil, 2013 National Health Survey.《2013年巴西全国健康调查：巴西卫生服务的使用与获取情况》
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Jun 1;51(suppl 1):3s. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051000074.
9
Health Policy on the pages of Revista de Saúde Pública.《公共卫生杂志》上的卫生政策。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Nov 10;50(0):65. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050000180.
10
Quality of cervical cancer screening in Brazil: external assessment of the PMAQ.巴西宫颈癌筛查质量：PMAQ的外部评估
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Jul 20;51:67. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006802.
引用本文的文献
1
Editorial processing of Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde: advances and perspectives in 2025.《流行病学与卫生服务》的编辑工作：2025年的进展与展望
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025 Aug 11;34:e20252002. doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20252002.en.
本文引用的文献
1
Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals.同行评议中的挑战：如何保证科学期刊编辑过程的质量和透明度。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2023 Jul;99(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
How to peer review: practical advice for early career researchers.如何进行同行评审：给初出茅庐的研究人员的实用建议。
Breathe (Sheff). 2022 Dec;18(4):220160. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0160-2022. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Editor's desk: Improving author experience.编辑手记：改善作者体验。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):745-746. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13856.
4
Not lowering the bar, just providing a step stool.不降低标准，只是提供一个踏脚凳。
Autophagy. 2021 Jul;17(7):1569-1570. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1936360. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
5
Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review - The Good, The Bad and The Ugly.关于同行评审，你需要知道的一切——好的、坏的和丑陋的。
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Aug;28(8):1148-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.171.
6
Generosity, collegiality, and scientific accuracy when writing and reviewing original research.在撰写和评审原始研究时要慷慨、友善和科学准确。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Feb;16(2):261-265. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.04.054. Epub 2019 May 12.
7
Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache.经同行评审后稿件被拒的原因。——《头痛杂志》
Headache. 2018 Nov;58(10):1511-1518. doi: 10.1111/head.13343. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
8
Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency.赋予同行评审员检查表以提高透明度。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun;2(6):929-935. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0545-z. Epub 2018 May 22.
9
Peer reviews: the dreaded rejection.同行评审：可怕的拒稿。
Dermatol Online J. 2018 Mar 15;24(3):13030/qt9h60v8r6.
10
Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author's perspective.同行评审过程的时长与质量：作者视角
Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):633-650. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Zotero 插件