Suppr超能文献

同行评审指南:如何撰写一篇优秀的评审意见?

Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?

作者信息

Allen Thomas Wesley

机构信息

1111 S St Louis Ave, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Tulsa, OK 74120-5440.

出版信息

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Dec;113(12):916-20. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070.

Abstract

Peer review is essential to the quality of scientific publications. As the volume of submissions to these journals increases, the need for an expanding cadre of trained reviewers also increases. Many reviewers do not receive formal training on conducting a peer review or education on the peer review process, however. The author presents an overview of the peer review process and provides guidance for conducting high-quality reviews of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and other scientific journals.

摘要

同行评审对于科学出版物的质量至关重要。随着提交给这些期刊的稿件数量增加,对不断扩大的经过培训的评审人员队伍的需求也在增加。然而,许多评审人员并未接受过关于进行同行评审的正式培训或关于同行评审过程的教育。作者概述了同行评审过程,并为对提交给《美国骨病协会杂志》和其他科学期刊的稿件进行高质量评审提供指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验