• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Specific IgE for Fag e 3 Predicts Oral Buckwheat Food Challenge Test Results and Anaphylaxis: A Pilot Study.荞麦特异性 IgE 预测口服荞麦食物挑战试验结果和过敏反应:一项初步研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;176(1):8-14. doi: 10.1159/000487135. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Reactions of Buckwheat-Hypersensitive Patients during Oral Food Challenge Are Rare, but Often Anaphylactic.荞麦过敏患者在口服食物激发试验期间的反应罕见,但常为过敏反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(2):116-122. doi: 10.1159/000456008. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study.皮肤点刺试验在荞麦过敏诊断中比特异性IgE更有用:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Allergol Int. 2018 Jan;67(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Predictor of buckwheat allergy in children based on challenge test results: a retrospective observational study in Japan.基于激发试验结果预测儿童荞麦过敏的因素:日本的一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul;54(4):183-188. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.224. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
Increasing specific immunoglobulin E levels correlate with the risk of anaphylaxis during an oral food challenge.特异性免疫球蛋白 E 水平升高与口服食物激发试验期间发生过敏反应的风险相关。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Jun;29(4):417-424. doi: 10.1111/pai.12896. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
6
Buckwheat Allergy in Asia.亚洲的荞麦过敏。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Sep;24(9):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01166-6. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
7
Usability of Fag e 2 ImmunoCAP in the diagnosis of buckwheat allergy.Fag e 2 ImmunoCAP 在诊断荞麦过敏中的可用性。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2011 Nov;303(9):635-42. doi: 10.1007/s00403-011-1142-z. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
8
Concomitant sensitization to legumin, Fag e 2 and Fag e 5 predicts buckwheat allergy.同时对 legumin、Fag e 2 和 Fag e 5 过敏可预测荞麦过敏。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Feb;48(2):217-224. doi: 10.1111/cea.13068. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Application of the 16-kDa buckwheat 2 S storage albumin protein for diagnosis of clinical reactivity.16 kDa荞麦2S贮藏白蛋白在临床反应性诊断中的应用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Sep;99(3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60661-8.
10
Predicting the outcome of the buckwheat oral challenge test: a first evaluation assuming a single serving of boiled buckwheat noodles.预测荞麦口服挑战试验的结果:假设食用一份煮荞麦面条的初步评估。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 May;56(3):121-127. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.315. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Buckwheat Allergy in Asia.亚洲的荞麦过敏。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Sep;24(9):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01166-6. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
Establishment of monoclonal antibodies of BW10kDa distinguish it from Fag e 2 related to anaphylaxis.BW10kDa单克隆抗体的建立将其与过敏反应相关的Fag e 2区分开来。
Food Chem (Oxf). 2024 May 26;8:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2024.100207. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
3
Sensitizations to wheat and strawberry: are they a tangible threat to atopic Egyptian.对小麦和草莓的致敏:它们对埃及特应性个体构成切实威胁吗?
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2022 Dec 15;11(6):84-91. eCollection 2022.
4
A Review on Epidemiological and Clinical Studies on Buckwheat Allergy.荞麦过敏的流行病学与临床研究综述
Plants (Basel). 2021 Mar 23;10(3):607. doi: 10.3390/plants10030607.
5
Understanding buckwheat allergies for the management of allergic reactions in humans and animals.了解荞麦过敏以管理人和动物的过敏反应。
Breed Sci. 2020 Mar;70(1):85-92. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.19051. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
A WAO - ARIA - GALEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnosis (PAMD@): Update 2020.WAO - ARIA - GALEN关于基于分子的过敏诊断的共识文件(PAMD@):2020年更新版
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Mar 7;13(2):100091. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100091. eCollection 2020 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors for Severe Reactions during Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges.双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验期间严重反应的危险因素。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(3):173-182. doi: 10.1159/000458724. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
2
Reactions of Buckwheat-Hypersensitive Patients during Oral Food Challenge Are Rare, but Often Anaphylactic.荞麦过敏患者在口服食物激发试验期间的反应罕见,但常为过敏反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(2):116-122. doi: 10.1159/000456008. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Clinical and laboratory findings of childhood buckwheat allergy in a single tertiary hospital.一家三级医院儿童荞麦过敏的临床及实验室检查结果
Korean J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;59(10):402-407. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2016.59.10.402. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Recent advances in component resolved diagnosis in food allergy.食物过敏中成分分辨诊断的最新进展。
Allergol Int. 2016 Oct;65(4):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
5
Usefulness of antigen-specific IgE probability curves derived from the 3gAllergy assay in diagnosing egg, cow's milk, and wheat allergies.源自3gAllergy检测的抗原特异性IgE概率曲线在诊断鸡蛋、牛奶和小麦过敏中的效用。
Allergol Int. 2017 Apr;66(2):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
6
Stability of specific IgE antibodies to common food and inhalant allergens.针对常见食物和吸入性变应原的特异性IgE抗体的稳定性。
Clin Biochem. 2016 Dec;49(18):1387-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Clinical utility of recombinant allergen components in diagnosing buckwheat allergy.重组变应原成分在荞麦过敏诊断中的临床应用
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Mar-Apr;4(2):322-3.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.11.028. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
8
Salmon roe-specific serum IgE predicts oral salmon roe food challenge test results.鲑鱼籽特异性血清IgE可预测口服鲑鱼籽食物激发试验结果。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016 May;27(3):324-7. doi: 10.1111/pai.12531. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
The predictive relationship between peanut- and Ara h 2-specific serum IgE concentrations and peanut allergy.花生特异性和Ara h 2特异性血清IgE浓度与花生过敏之间的预测关系。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jan-Feb;3(1):131-2.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
[Buckwheat allergy can cause live-threatening anaphylaxia].荞麦过敏可导致危及生命的过敏反应。
Ugeskr Laeger. 2014 Dec 15;176(25A).

荞麦特异性 IgE 预测口服荞麦食物挑战试验结果和过敏反应:一项初步研究。

Specific IgE for Fag e 3 Predicts Oral Buckwheat Food Challenge Test Results and Anaphylaxis: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018;176(1):8-14. doi: 10.1159/000487135. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1159/000487135
PMID:29635254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5969075/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Buckwheat (BW) is the source of a life-threatening allergen. Fag e 3-specific serum IgE (sIgE) is more useful than BW-sIgE for diagnosis; however, it is unknown whether Fag e 3-sIgE can predict oral food challenge (OFC) results and anaphylaxis. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of Fag e 3-sIgE in predicting OFC results and anaphylaxis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of BW- and Fag e 3-sIgE data obtained using the ImmunoCAP® assay system and fluorescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay from children who underwent OFC using 3,072 mg of BW protein between July 2006 and March 2014 at Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

RESULTS

We analyzed 60 patients aged 1.9-13.4 years (median 6.0 years); 20 (33%) showed objective symptoms upon BW OFC. The patients without symptoms had significantly lower Fag e 3-sIgE than those with non-anaphylactic (p < 0.001) and anaphylactic reactions to BW (p = 0.004). Fag e 3-sIgE was the only tested factor that significantly predicted positive OFC results (odds ratio 8.93, 95% confidence interval 3.10-25.73, p < 0.001) and OFC-induced anaphylaxis (2.67, 1.12-6.35, p = 0.027). We suggest that a threshold Fag e 3-sIgE level of 18.0 kUE/L has 95% probability of provoking a positive reaction to BW.

CONCLUSIONS

Fag e 3-sIgE predicted OFC results and OFC-induced anaphylaxis. We further emphasize paying careful attention to the risk of BW OFC-induced anaphylaxis.

摘要

背景

荞麦(BW)是一种危及生命的过敏原。与 BW-sIgE 相比,Fag e 3 特异性血清 IgE(sIgE)更有助于诊断;然而,目前尚不清楚 Fag e 3-sIgE 是否可以预测口服食物挑战(OFC)结果和过敏反应。本研究旨在阐明 Fag e 3-sIgE 预测 OFC 结果和过敏反应的功效。

方法

我们对 2006 年 7 月至 2014 年 3 月期间在日本神奈川县相模原市综合医院接受 BW 蛋白 3072mg 的 OFC 的儿童使用 ImmunoCAP®检测系统和荧光酶联免疫吸附试验获得的 BW 和 Fag e 3-sIgE 数据进行了回顾性分析。

结果

我们分析了 60 名年龄为 1.9-13.4 岁(中位数 6.0 岁)的患者;20 名(33%)在 BW-OFC 时出现了客观症状。无症状患者的 Fag e 3-sIgE 明显低于非过敏(p <0.001)和 BW 过敏反应(p=0.004)患者。Fag e 3-sIgE 是唯一显著预测 OFC 阳性结果(优势比 8.93,95%置信区间 3.10-25.73,p <0.001)和 OFC 诱导过敏反应(2.67,1.12-6.35,p=0.027)的测试因素。我们建议,Fag e 3-sIgE 阈值为 18.0 kUE/L 时,有 95%的可能性引发对 BW 的阳性反应。

结论

Fag e 3-sIgE 预测了 OFC 结果和 OFC 诱导的过敏反应。我们进一步强调要小心注意 BW-OFC 诱导过敏反应的风险。