• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clarifying the roles of patients in research.

作者信息

Liabo Kristin, Boddy Kate, Burchmore Helen, Cockcroft Emma, Britten Nicky

机构信息

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Apr 10;361:k1463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1463.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.k1463
PMID:29636343
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Clarifying the roles of patients in research.明确患者在研究中的角色。
BMJ. 2018 Apr 10;361:k1463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1463.
2
The right to participate in high-risk research.参与高风险研究的权利。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):1009-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61575-5. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
3
Patients' roles and rights in research.患者在研究中的角色与权利。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 25;362:k3193. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3193.
4
The right to participate in high-risk research.参与高风险研究的权利。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):127-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61155-7.
5
The right to participate in high-risk research.参与高风险研究的权利。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61156-9.
6
The right to participate in high-risk research - Author's reply.参与高风险研究的权利——作者回复
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):128-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61157-0.
7
[Ethics of biomedical research: questions about patient information].[生物医学研究伦理：关于患者信息的问题]
Med Sci (Paris). 2013 Feb;29(2):206-10. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2013292020. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity.临床研究中的公平受试者选择：机会的形式平等
J Med Ethics. 2016 Oct;42(10):672-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103311. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
9
Is emergency research without initial consent justified? The consent substitute model.未经初始同意的紧急研究是否合理？同意替代模式。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13;170(16):1508-9; author reply 1509. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.295.
10
Advancing physicians' skills versus safeguarding individual patient interests: an ethical dilemma.提升医生技能与维护个体患者利益：一种伦理困境。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(4):271-2. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2013.082.

引用本文的文献

1
Involving People With Lived Experience in Electronic Health Record Database Studies Reflections and Learning From the CHOOSE Study.让有实际经验的人参与电子健康记录数据库研究：对CHOOSE研究的思考与收获
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70131. doi: 10.1111/hex.70131.
2
[A qualitative interview study to streamline integration of patient participation in research].[一项旨在简化患者参与研究整合流程的定性访谈研究]
Gesundheitswesen. 2025 May;87(5):318-327. doi: 10.1055/a-2445-5498. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
3
Conceptualizing Patient as an Organization With the Adoption of Digital Health.
将患者概念化为采用数字健康技术的组织。
Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 24;15:11795972241277292. doi: 10.1177/11795972241277292. eCollection 2024.
4
A feeling of not being alone - Patients' with COPD experiences of a group-based self-management education with a digital website: A qualitative study.一种不孤单的感觉——基于群组的自我管理教育和数字网站的 COPD 患者体验：一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Apr;11(4):e2153. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2153.
5
Working with children and young people in research: Supportive practices and pathways to impact.在研究中与儿童和青少年合作：支持性实践及产生影响的途径。
J Child Health Care. 2025 Mar;29(1):34-52. doi: 10.1177/13674935231171451. Epub 2023 May 15.
6
Developing sustainable patient and public involvement in mesothelioma research: multi-method exploration with researchers, patients, carers, and patient organisations.推动患者和公众可持续地参与间皮瘤研究：与研究人员、患者、护理人员及患者组织开展的多方法探索
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 25;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00426-5.
7
Introducing patient and public involvement practices to healthcare research in Austria: strategies to promote change at multiple levels.将患者和公众参与实践引入奥地利的医疗保健研究：在多个层面推动变革的策略。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 9;11(8):e045618. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045618.
8
Formalising the induction of patient and public involvement contributors on trial oversight committees.规范患者和公众参与人员在试验监督委员会中的引入流程。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 17;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00269-y.
9
To Expand the Evidence Base About Harms from Tests and Treatments.拓展关于检查和治疗危害的证据基础。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2105-2110. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06597-9. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Perspectives on life participation by young adults with chronic kidney disease: an interview study.慢性肾病青年成人的生活参与视角：一项访谈研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e037840. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037840.