Morley Wendy A
Thionetics, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 27;9:166. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00166. eCollection 2018.
Brain injury occurs in two phases: the initial injury itself and a secondary cascade of precise immune-based neurochemical events. The secondary phase is typically functional in nature and characterized by delayed axonal injury with more axonal disconnections occurring than in the initial phase. Axonal injury occurs across the spectrum of disease severity, with subconcussive injury, especially when repetitive, now considered capable of producing significant neurological damage consistent with axonal injury seen in clinically evident concussion, despite no observable symptoms. This review is the first to introduce the concept of environmental subconcussive injury (ESCI) and sets out how secondary brain damage from ESCI once past the juncture of microglial activation appears to follow the same neuron-damaging pathway as secondary brain damage from conventional brain injury. The immune response associated with ESCI is strikingly similar to that mounted after conventional concussion. Specifically, microglial activation is followed closely by glutamate and calcium flux, excitotoxicity, reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generation, lipid peroxidation, and mitochondrial dysfunction and energy crisis. ESCI damage also occurs in two phases, with the primary damage coming from microbiome injury (due to microbiome-altering events) and secondary damage (axonal injury) from progressive secondary neurochemical events. The concept of ESCI and the underlying mechanisms have profound implications for the understanding of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) etiology because it has previously been suggested that repetitive axonal injury may be the primary CTE pathogenesis in susceptible individuals and it is best correlated with lifetime brain trauma load. Taken together, it appears that susceptibility to brain injury and downstream neurodegenerative diseases, such as CTE, can be conceptualized as a continuum of brain resilience. At one end is optimal resilience, capable of launching effective responses to injury with spontaneous recovery, and at the other end is diminished resilience with a compromised ability to respond and/or heal appropriately. Modulating factors such as one's total cumulative and synergistic brain trauma load, bioavailability of key nutrients needed for proper functioning of restorative metabolic pathways (specifically those involved in the deactivation and clearance of metabolic by-products of brain injury) are key to ultimately determining one's brain resilience.
初始损伤本身以及基于免疫的精确神经化学事件的继发性级联反应。继发性阶段本质上通常是功能性的,其特征是轴突损伤延迟,且轴突断开连接的情况比初始阶段更多。轴突损伤在各种疾病严重程度范围内都会发生,亚脑震荡损伤,尤其是重复性的亚脑震荡损伤,现在被认为能够产生与临床明显脑震荡中所见轴突损伤一致的重大神经损伤,尽管没有可观察到症状。本综述首次引入环境亚脑震荡损伤(ESCI)的概念,并阐述了一旦越过小胶质细胞激活的节点,ESCI导致的继发性脑损伤似乎与传统脑损伤导致的继发性脑损伤遵循相同的神经元损伤途径。与ESCI相关的免疫反应与传统脑震荡后的免疫反应惊人地相似。具体而言,小胶质细胞激活后紧接着是谷氨酸和钙通量、兴奋性毒性、活性氧和活性氮(RNS)生成、脂质过氧化以及线粒体功能障碍和能量危机。ESCI损伤也分两个阶段发生,原发性损伤来自微生物群损伤(由于改变微生物群的事件),继发性损伤(轴突损伤)来自进行性继发性神经化学事件。ESCI的概念及其潜在机制对理解慢性创伤性脑病(CTE)的病因具有深远意义,因为此前有人提出重复性轴突损伤可能是易感个体中CTE的主要发病机制,并且它与终生脑外伤负荷的相关性最好。综上所述,对脑损伤和下游神经退行性疾病(如CTE)的易感性似乎可以被概念化为脑弹性的连续体。一端是最佳弹性,能够对损伤发起有效的反应并自发恢复,另一端是弹性减弱,对损伤做出反应和/或适当愈合的能力受损。调节因素,如一个人的总累积和协同脑外伤负荷、恢复性代谢途径正常运作所需关键营养素的生物利用度(特别是那些参与脑损伤代谢副产物失活和清除的营养素),是最终决定一个人脑弹性的关键。