Sweeting Helen, Whitley Elise, Teyhan Alison, Hunt Kate
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Dec 29;1(1):e000191. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000191. eCollection 2017.
Evidence on sex differences in physical morbidity in childhood and adolescence is based largely on studies employing single/few physical morbidity measures and different informants. We describe sex differences in a wide range of parent/carer-reported physical morbidity measures between ages 4 and 13 years to determine evidence for a generalised pattern of an emerging/increasing female 'excess'.
Parents/carers (approximately 90% mothers) of the population-based UK ALSPAC cohort provided data on general health, physical conditions/symptoms and infections in their child approximately annually between ages 4 and 13. Logistic regression analyses determined the odds of each morbidity measure being reported in respect of females (vs males) at each age and the sex-by-age interaction, to investigate any changing sex difference with age.
Six measures (general health past year/month, high temperature, rash, eye and ear infections) demonstrated an , and six (earache, stomach-ache, headache, lice/scabies, cold sores, urinary infections) an ; one (breathlessness) showed a . Just two showed either an or 'excess'. Most changes were evident during childhood (prepuberty). Six measures showed and four '. Few measures showed no sex differences throughout this period of childhood/early adolescence.
Sex differences are evident for a wide range of parent-reported physical morbidity measures in childhood and early adolescence. Far more measures showed an emerging/increasing female 'excess' than an emerging/increasing male 'excess'. Further studies are required to examine whether patterns differ across sociodemographic/cultural groups, and to explain this generalised pattern.
关于儿童和青少年身体疾病性别差异的证据主要基于采用单一/少数身体疾病测量方法和不同信息提供者的研究。我们描述了4至13岁期间家长/照顾者报告的一系列身体疾病测量中的性别差异,以确定是否存在女性“过剩”这一普遍模式出现/增加的证据。
英国基于人群的阿冯纵向父母与儿童研究(ALSPAC)队列中的家长/照顾者(约90%为母亲)在孩子4至13岁期间大约每年提供一次关于孩子总体健康、身体状况/症状和感染的数据。逻辑回归分析确定了每个年龄段女性(相对于男性)报告每种疾病测量的几率以及性别与年龄的交互作用,以研究性别差异是否随年龄变化。
六项测量指标(过去一年/一个月的总体健康状况、高烧、皮疹、眼睛和耳朵感染)显示女性“过剩”,六项(耳痛、胃痛、头痛、虱子/疥疮、唇疱疹、尿路感染)显示男性“过剩”;一项(呼吸急促)显示无性别差异。只有两项显示女性或男性“过剩”。大多数变化在儿童期(青春期前)很明显。六项测量指标显示女性“过剩”,四项显示男性“过剩”。在整个儿童期/青少年早期,很少有测量指标显示无性别差异。
在儿童期和青少年早期,家长报告的一系列身体疾病测量中存在明显的性别差异。显示女性“过剩”出现/增加的测量指标远多于显示男性“过剩”出现/增加的指标。需要进一步研究以检查不同社会人口统计学/文化群体的模式是否不同,并解释这一普遍模式。