• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过配对联想刺激,在抑郁症中发现前额叶皮层的神经可塑性受损。

Impaired neuroplasticity in the prefrontal cortex in depression indexed through paired associative stimulation.

机构信息

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Toronto, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2018 May;35(5):448-456. doi: 10.1002/da.22738. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1002/da.22738
PMID:29637656
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dysfunctional neuroplasticity may be one of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying major depression. We have previously established methods to assess neuroplasticity from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using a paired associative stimulation (PAS) paradigm, which pairs a preceding peripheral nerve stimulation with subsequent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG). We aimed to investigate neuroplasticity through the PAS paradigm in the DLPFC in patients with depression compared to healthy subjects.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with depression and 28 healthy controls participated in this study. There were no significant age or sex differences between the two groups. All participants received PAS paradigm in the DLPFC. We analyzed PAS induced potentiation from the DLPFC in both groups calculating the power of TMS-evoked potentials (TEP). A two-way ANOVA with PAS effect as a within-subject factor and diagnostic group as a between-subject factor was performed to examine the group differences in the PAS paradigm.

RESULTS

DLPFC-PAS induced a significant potentiation at the stimulation site in both patients and healthy subjects (mean ± SD: 1.24 ± 0.33 [μV] vs. 1.48 ± 0.28 [μV]). However, when we compared PAS potentiation between patients and healthy subjects, there were significant main effects of PAS (F = 68.63, p < 0.0001) and PAS-by-diagnostic group interaction (F = 25.05, p < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients had a significantly lower PAS potentiation compared to healthy subjects (t = 3.128, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSTIONS

Our findings provide evidence for impaired neuroplasticity in DLPFC in patients with depression compared to healthy subjects. Such findings may ultimately help us understand the pathophysiology of MDD and mechanisms involved in its treatment.

摘要

背景

神经功能失调可能是导致重度抑郁症的病理生理学机制之一。我们之前已经建立了使用成对关联刺激 (PAS) 范式评估背外侧前额叶皮层 (DLPFC) 神经可塑性的方法,该范式将先前的外周神经刺激与随后的经颅磁刺激 (TMS) 结合脑电图 (EEG) 结合使用。我们旨在通过与健康对照组相比,在抑郁症患者中研究 DLPFC 中的 PAS 范式下的神经可塑性。

方法

29 名抑郁症患者和 28 名健康对照者参与了这项研究。两组之间在年龄和性别方面没有显着差异。所有参与者均在 DLPFC 中接受 PAS 范式。我们通过计算 TMS 诱发的脑电信号 (TEP) 的功率来分析两组的 DLPFC-PAS 诱导的增强。采用 PAS 效应作为内源性因素,诊断组作为组间因素的双因素方差分析来检验 PAS 范式中的组间差异。

结果

在患者和健康受试者中,DLPFC-PAS 在刺激部位均引起明显的增强(平均值±标准差:1.24±0.33[μV]与 1.48±0.28[μV])。然而,当我们比较患者和健康受试者之间的 PAS 增强时,PAS 有显著的主效应(F=68.63,p<0.0001)和 PAS-诊断组的交互作用(F=25.05,p<0.0001)。事后分析表明,与健康受试者相比,患者的 PAS 增强明显降低(t=3.128,p=0.003)。

结论

我们的研究结果提供了证据,表明与健康受试者相比,抑郁症患者的 DLPFC 神经可塑性受损。这些发现最终可能有助于我们了解 MDD 的病理生理学和其治疗的相关机制。

相似文献

1
Impaired neuroplasticity in the prefrontal cortex in depression indexed through paired associative stimulation.通过配对联想刺激,在抑郁症中发现前额叶皮层的神经可塑性受损。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 May;35(5):448-456. doi: 10.1002/da.22738. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Neuroplasticity of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with treatment-resistant depression as indexed with paired associative stimulation: a TMS-EEG study.以配对联想刺激为指标的难治性抑郁症患者左侧背外侧前额叶皮质的神经可塑性:一项经颅磁刺激-脑电图研究
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad515.
3
Assessment of neuroplasticity in late-life depression with transcranial magnetic stimulation.利用经颅磁刺激评估老年期抑郁症的神经可塑性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Oct;105:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
4
Impairment of Neuroplasticity in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex by Alcohol.酒精对背外侧前额叶皮质神经可塑性的损害。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 13;7(1):5276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04764-9.
5
PAS-induced potentiation of cortical-evoked activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.PAS 诱导的背外侧前额叶皮质皮层诱发电活动的增强。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Nov;38(12):2545-52. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.161. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
6
Extent of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Plasticity and Its Association With Working Memory in Patients With Alzheimer Disease.阿尔茨海默病患者背外侧前额叶皮质可塑性程度及其与工作记忆的关联
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1266-1274. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3292.
7
Potentiation of quantitative electroencephalograms following prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with major depression.前额叶重复经颅磁刺激对抑郁症患者定量脑电图的增效作用。
Neurosci Res. 2013 Sep-Oct;77(1-2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
8
Effect of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex structural measures on neuroplasticity and response to paired-associative stimulation in Alzheimer's dementia.背外侧前额叶皮层结构测量对阿尔茨海默病神经可塑性和对成对联想刺激反应的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jul 29;379(1906):20230233. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0233. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
9
Stimulus uncertainty enhances long-term potentiation-like plasticity in human motor cortex.刺激的不确定性增强了人类运动皮层中类似长时程增强的可塑性。
Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
10
Magnetic seizure therapy reduces suicidal ideation and produces neuroplasticity in treatment-resistant depression.磁惊厥疗法可减少治疗抵抗性抑郁症的自杀意念,并产生神经可塑性。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 23;8(1):253. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0302-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuroinflammation-A Crucial Factor in the Pathophysiology of Depression-A Comprehensive Review.神经炎症——抑郁症病理生理学中的关键因素——综述
Biomolecules. 2025 Mar 30;15(4):502. doi: 10.3390/biom15040502.
2
Embracing Internal States: A Review of Optimization of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Depression.接纳内在状态:重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的优化综述
Neurosci Bull. 2025 May;41(5):866-880. doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01347-3. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Structural neural plasticity evoked by rapid-acting antidepressant interventions.
快速起效抗抑郁干预引发的神经结构可塑性
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 Feb;26(2):101-114. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00876-0. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Psychopharmacological Approaches for Neural Plasticity and Neurogenesis in Major Depressive Disorders.精神药理学方法在治疗主要抑郁障碍中的神经可塑性和神经发生作用。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1456:27-48. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-4402-2_2.
5
The therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine in depression: focused on the modulation of neuroplasticity.中药在抑郁症中的治疗潜力:聚焦于神经可塑性的调节
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 26;15:1426769. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1426769. eCollection 2024.
6
Status and trends of TMS research in depressive disorder: a bibliometric and visual analysis.抑郁症经颅磁刺激研究的现状与趋势:文献计量学与可视化分析
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 8;15:1432792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1432792. eCollection 2024.
7
NMDA and GABA Receptor-Mediated Plasticity Induced by 10-Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.10赫兹重复经颅磁刺激诱导的NMDA和GABA受体介导的可塑性
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 26:rs.3.rs-4630964. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4630964/v1.
8
Mechanisms of Action of TMS in the Treatment of Depression.TMS 在抑郁症治疗中的作用机制。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2024;66:233-277. doi: 10.1007/7854_2024_483.
9
Neuroplasticity of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with treatment-resistant depression as indexed with paired associative stimulation: a TMS-EEG study.以配对联想刺激为指标的难治性抑郁症患者左侧背外侧前额叶皮质的神经可塑性:一项经颅磁刺激-脑电图研究
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad515.
10
Targeting metaplasticity mechanisms to promote sustained antidepressant actions.靶向可塑性机制以促进持续的抗抑郁作用。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;29(4):1114-1127. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02397-1. Epub 2024 Jan 4.