Oliver R G
Department of Child Dental Health, Dental School, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Mar;93(3):196-200. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(88)80003-9.
The amount of residual adhesive following three different methods of bracket removal was examined. The effects of tooth position, bracket base type, and composite mix were also examined. It was found that there was a nonsignificant trend for more composite to remain on upper anterior teeth and a highly statistically significant difference between a paste/paste and paste/liquid composite mix. Bracket base type showed no significant difference. One method of bracket removal resulted in significantly less composite remaining than the other two methods.
研究了三种不同的托槽拆除方法后的残余黏合剂数量。还研究了牙齿位置、托槽基底类型和复合树脂混合物的影响。结果发现，上颌前牙上残留的复合树脂较多，但差异无统计学意义，而糊剂/糊剂和糊剂/液体复合树脂混合物之间存在高度统计学差异。托槽基底类型无显著差异。一种托槽拆除方法导致残留的复合树脂明显少于其他两种方法。
