• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bond strength of three orthodontic adhesives.

作者信息

Alexandre P, Young J, Sandrik J L, Bowman D

出版信息

Am J Orthod. 1981 Jun;79(6):653-60. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90357-2.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(81)90357-2
PMID:6453532
Abstract

A method was devised to study the bond strength of direct-bonding orthodontic adhesives. A shear load was applied parallel to the tooth-adhesive-bracket interface by means of an Instron Universal Testing Machine. The bond strength was found to increase for some products after 27 days. However, no significant differences could be detected 1 day after placement. The interface was studied to determine the mode of failure. In all cases bond failure occurred as mixed adhesive-cohesive phenomena.

摘要

相似文献

1
Bond strength of three orthodontic adhesives.
Am J Orthod. 1981 Jun;79(6):653-60. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90357-2.
2
The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive.不同托槽去除方法对残余黏合剂量的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Mar;93(3):196-200. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(88)80003-9.
3
In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets.
Am J Orthod. 1985 Mar;87(3):247-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90046-6.
4
Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.三种粘结剂的粘结强度比较：复合树脂、混合型玻璃离子水门汀和玻璃填充型玻璃离子水门汀。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan;119(1):36-42. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.110519.
5
Bond strength comparison: a simplified indirect technique versus direct placement of brackets.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90223-0.
6
Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、聚酸改性复合树脂和聚硅氧烷黏结剂体系体外黏结强度的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Mar;129(3):330.e11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.011.
7
Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jul;100(1):72-9. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70052-X.
8
Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles?通用粘结剂与牙本质的粘结——新瓶装旧酒？
J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
9
Bond strength of a luting composite to dentin with different bonding systems.不同粘结系统下粘结性复合树脂与牙本质的粘结强度
J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Aug;58(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90171-5.
10
Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.陶瓷正畸托槽与牙釉质的剪切粘结强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Oct;98(4):348-53. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81492-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.陶瓷托槽Fascination®和Fascination®2的剪切粘结强度及釉质骨折行为
J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Jan;73(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0059-7. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
2
[Improvement in the adhesive strength of orthodontic brackets on unit-cast and fired dental alloys by microsandblasting].
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1995 Mar;56(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02310431.
3
[Glass ionomer cements as orthodontic bracket adhesives. An in vitro study with 4 glass ionomer cements (GIC) and 2 conventional orthodontic bracket adhesives as the comparative group].[玻璃离子水门汀作为正畸托槽黏结剂。一项以4种玻璃离子水门汀（GIC）和2种传统正畸托槽黏结剂作为对照组的体外研究]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1990 Aug;51(4):204-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02167350.
4
[The tensile strength of bracket adhesives depending on the adhesive layer thickness--an in-vitro study].[托槽黏结剂的拉伸强度取决于黏结剂层厚度——一项体外研究]
Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992 Oct;53(5):297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF02325078.