• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型微锁定种植修复系统的承载能力与固位:一项体外初步研究

Load-Bearing Capacity and Retention of Newly Developed Micro-Locking Implant Prosthetic System: An In Vitro Pilot Study.

作者信息

Choi Jae-Won, Choi Kyung-Hee, Chae Hee-Jin, Chae Sung-Ki, Bae Eun-Bin, Lee Jin-Ju, Lee So-Hyoun, Jeong Chang-Mo, Huh Jung-Bo

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea.

Research and Development Institute, Cowellmedi Co., Ltd., Busan 46986, Korea.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2018 Apr 6;11(4):564. doi: 10.3390/ma11040564.

DOI:10.3390/ma11040564
PMID:29642407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5951448/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to introduce the newly developed micro-locking implant prosthetic system and to evaluate the resulting its characteristics. To evaluate load-bearing capacity, 25 implants were divided into five groups: external-hexagon connection (EH), internal-octagon connection (IO), internal-hexagon connection (IH), one-body implant (OB), micro-locking implant system (ML). The maximum compressive load was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM) according to the ISO 14801. Retention was evaluated in two experiments: (1) a tensile test of the structure modifications of the components (attachment and implant) and (2) a tensile test after cyclic loading (total 5,000,000 cycles, 100 N, 2 Hz). The load-bearing capacity of the ML group was not significantly different from the other groups ( > 0.05). The number of balls in the attachment and the presence of a hexagonal receptacle did not show a significant correlation with retention ( > 0.05), but the shape of the retentive groove in the implant post had a statistically significant effect on retention ( < 0.05). On the other hand, the retention loss was observed during the initial 1,000,000 cycles, but an overall constant retention was maintained afterward. Various preclinical studies on this novel micro-locking implant prosthetic system should continue so that it can be applied in clinical practice.

摘要

本研究的目的是介绍新开发的微锁定种植体修复系统,并评估其由此产生的特性。为了评估承载能力,将25颗种植体分为五组:外六角连接(EH)、内八角连接(IO)、内六角连接(IH)、一体式种植体(OB)、微锁定种植体系统(ML)。根据ISO 14801标准,使用万能试验机(UTM)测量最大压缩载荷。在两个实验中评估固位力:(1)对部件(附着体和种植体)的结构改良进行拉伸试验,以及(2)循环加载(总共5,000,000次循环,100 N,2 Hz)后的拉伸试验。ML组的承载能力与其他组无显著差异(>0.05)。附着体中的球数和六边形容纳腔的存在与固位力无显著相关性(>0.05),但种植体桩上固位槽的形状对固位力有统计学显著影响(<0.05)。另一方面,在最初的1,000,000次循环中观察到固位力损失,但此后总体保持恒定的固位力。关于这种新型微锁定种植体修复系统的各种临床前研究应继续进行,以便其能够应用于临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/104d72745109/materials-11-00564-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/8eec2908c471/materials-11-00564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/f4e6477c1384/materials-11-00564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/ae9aa8615a60/materials-11-00564-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/5076e215352c/materials-11-00564-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/bbc19b6bcba3/materials-11-00564-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/01ede36f36f6/materials-11-00564-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/104d72745109/materials-11-00564-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/8eec2908c471/materials-11-00564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/f4e6477c1384/materials-11-00564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/ae9aa8615a60/materials-11-00564-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/5076e215352c/materials-11-00564-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/bbc19b6bcba3/materials-11-00564-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/01ede36f36f6/materials-11-00564-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3f3/5951448/104d72745109/materials-11-00564-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Load-Bearing Capacity and Retention of Newly Developed Micro-Locking Implant Prosthetic System: An In Vitro Pilot Study.新型微锁定种植修复系统的承载能力与固位:一项体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2018 Apr 6;11(4):564. doi: 10.3390/ma11040564.
2
In vitro integrity of implant external hexagon after application of surgical placement torque simulating implant locking.模拟种植体锁定施加手术就位扭矩后种植体外六角的体外完整性。
Braz Oral Res. 2008 Apr-Jun;22(2):125-31. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242008000200006.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis.内外六方平台转换种植体-基台连接的生物力学评估:体外实验室和三维有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2012 Oct;28(10):e218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
4
The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.不同种植体角度和周期性脱位对覆盖义齿附着系统固位性能的体外影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Sep;102(3):140-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60134-7.
5
Misfit of Three Different Implant-Abutment Connections Before and After Cyclic Load Application: An In Vitro Study.三种不同种植体-基台连接在循环加载前后的适配性:一项体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jul/Aug;32(4):822-829. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5629.
6
Settling of abutments into implants and changes in removal torque in five different implant-abutment connections. Part 1: Cyclic loading.五种不同种植体-基台连接方式中基台植入种植体的就位情况及拆除扭矩的变化。第1部分:循环加载。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):1079-84. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3383.
7
Effect of intentional abutment disconnection on the micro-movements of the implant-abutment assembly: a 3D digital image correlation analysis.故意断开基台对种植体-基台组件微动的影响:三维数字图像相关分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jan;28(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/clr.12607. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.两种种植体附着体在不同种植体角度下的固位和磨损行为。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint: failure mode and bending resistance.带六边形介导对接接头的种植体-基台界面稳定性:失效模式与抗弯曲性
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(4):221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00067.x.
10
Abutment screw loosening and bending resistance of external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading.侧向循环加载后外六角种植体系统的基台螺丝松动及抗弯曲性能
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):157-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00216.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Test of INTEGRA Dental Implant System.INTEGRA牙科种植系统的有限元分析与疲劳测试
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;17(5):1213. doi: 10.3390/ma17051213.
2
A prospective multicenter clinical study on the efficiency of detachable ball- and spring-retained implant prosthesis.一项关于可拆球和弹簧固位种植体修复体有效性的前瞻性多中心临床研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2023 Aug;15(4):202-213. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.4.202. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar.

本文引用的文献

1
Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis.螺钉固位与粘结固位的种植体支持固定义齿修复。
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):141-151. doi: 10.1111/prd.12168.
2
Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.两种种植体附着体在不同种植体角度下的固位和磨损行为。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5):628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
3
Fatigue Failure of Narrow Implants with Different Implant-Abutment Connection Designs.
Locator®和ADD-TOC附着体与CAD-CAM铣削杆结合的固位力和磨损模式比较
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;14(1):12-21. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.1.12. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
4
Influence of an Implant Fixture including a Freely Removable Micro-Locking Implant Prosthesis on Peri-Implant Tissues and Implant Prostheses: A Prospective Clinical Study.一种包含可自由拆卸微锁定种植体假体的种植体固定装置对种植体周围组织和种植体假体的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3321. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153321.
5
Fracture strength analysis of titanium insert-reinforced zirconia abutments according to the axial height of the titanium insert with an internal connection.内置式钛钉增强氧化锆基台的轴向高度对钛钉断裂强度的影响分析
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249208. eCollection 2021.
6
Retrospective Clinical Study of a Freely Removable Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis by a Microlocking System.采用微锁系统的可自由摘戴式种植体支持固定义齿的回顾性临床研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 3;2020:7929585. doi: 10.1155/2020/7929585. eCollection 2020.
7
Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application.牙科种植体疲劳测试的优化规划与评估:一种特定的软件应用程序
Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 31;9(11):372. doi: 10.3390/biology9110372.
不同种植体-基台连接设计的窄径种植体疲劳失效
J Prosthodont. 2018 Aug;27(7):659-664. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12540. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Influence of the connection design and titanium grades of the implant complex on resistance under static loading.种植体复合体的连接设计和钛等级对静态载荷下抗力的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):388-395. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.388. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Clinical application of a shape memory implant abutment system.形状记忆种植体基台系统的临床应用
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jan;117(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
The selection criteria of temporary or permanent luting agents in implant-supported prostheses: in vitro study.种植体支持修复体中临时或永久粘结剂的选择标准:体外研究
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Apr;8(2):144-9. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.144. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.压缩循环加载对种植体基台上粘结的铸造单冠固位力的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):80-2. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4355.
8
Screw- versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications.螺钉固位与水泥固位种植体修复体:口腔修复维护与并发症的系统评价
Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):127-45. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3947.
9
Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.用于种植体支持修复体的各种粘接剂的固位力:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):649-54. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00008.
10
Narrow-Diameter versus Standard-Diameter Implants and Their Effect on the Need for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Virtual Three-Dimensional Study.窄径与标准径种植体及其对引导骨再生需求的影响:一项虚拟三维研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17(6):1127-33. doi: 10.1111/cid.12224. Epub 2014 Jun 6.