• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科种植体疲劳测试的优化规划与评估:一种特定的软件应用程序

Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application.

作者信息

García-González Marta, Blasón-González Sergio, García-García Ismael, Lamela-Rey María Jesús, Fernández-Canteli Alfonso, Álvarez-Arenal Ángel

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dentistry, University of Oviedo, C/. Catedratico Serrano s/n., 33006 Oviedo, Spain.

Department of Component Safety, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -Prüfung (BAM), Unter den Eichen 87, Germany BAM, 12205 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 31;9(11):372. doi: 10.3390/biology9110372.

DOI:10.3390/biology9110372
PMID:33142807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7693306/
Abstract

Mechanical complications in implant-supported fixed dental prostheses are often related to implant and prosthetic design. Although the current ISO 14801 provides a framework for the evaluation of dental implant mechanical reliability, strict adherence to it may be difficult to achieve due to the large number of test specimens which it requires as well as the fact that it does not offer any probabilistic reference for determining the endurance limit. In order to address these issues, a new software program called ProFatigue is presented as a potentially powerful tool to optimize fatigue testing of implant-supported prostheses. The present work provides a brief description of some concepts such as load, fatigue and stress-number of cycles to failure curves (S-N curves), before subsequently describing the current regulatory situation. After analyzing the two most recent versions of the ISO recommendation (from 2008 and 2016), some limitations inherent to the experimental methods which they propose are highlighted. Finally, the main advantages and instructions for the correct implementation of the ProFatigue free software are given. This software will contribute to improving the performance of fatigue testing in a more accurate and optimized way, helping researchers to gain a better understanding of the behavior of dental implants in this type of mechanical test.

摘要

种植体支持的固定义齿的机械并发症通常与种植体和修复体设计有关。尽管现行的ISO 14801为评估牙科种植体的机械可靠性提供了一个框架,但由于其需要大量的测试样本,以及它没有提供任何用于确定疲劳极限的概率参考,因此可能难以严格遵守该标准。为了解决这些问题,提出了一种名为ProFatigue的新软件程序,作为优化种植体支持的修复体疲劳测试的潜在有力工具。本文首先简要介绍了一些概念,如载荷、疲劳和应力-失效循环次数曲线(S-N曲线),随后描述了当前的监管情况。在分析了ISO建议的两个最新版本(2008年和2016年)之后,强调了它们所提出的实验方法固有的一些局限性。最后,给出了ProFatigue免费软件的主要优点和正确使用说明。该软件将有助于以更准确和优化的方式提高疲劳测试的性能,帮助研究人员更好地理解牙科种植体在这类机械测试中的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/7098b970ccf8/biology-09-00372-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/ff87a078f755/biology-09-00372-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/1ad335cecc30/biology-09-00372-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/732e2d813cc3/biology-09-00372-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/7098b970ccf8/biology-09-00372-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/ff87a078f755/biology-09-00372-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/1ad335cecc30/biology-09-00372-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/732e2d813cc3/biology-09-00372-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3497/7693306/7098b970ccf8/biology-09-00372-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimized Planning and Evaluation of Dental Implant Fatigue Testing: A Specific Software Application.牙科种植体疲劳测试的优化规划与评估:一种特定的软件应用程序
Biology (Basel). 2020 Oct 31;9(11):372. doi: 10.3390/biology9110372.
2
Mechanical Reliability Evaluation of an Oral Implant-Abutment System According to UNI EN ISO 14801 Fatigue Test Protocol.根据UNI EN ISO 14801疲劳试验协议对口腔种植体-基台系统进行机械可靠性评估。
Implant Dent. 2016 Oct;25(5):613-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000453.
3
Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior.牙种植体直径对疲劳性能的影响。第一部分:力学行为。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Apr;16(2):172-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00477.x. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
4
Effect of loading frequency on cyclic fatigue lifetime of a standard-diameter implant with an internal abutment connection.加载频率对带内连接体的标准直径种植体循环疲劳寿命的影响。
Dent Mater. 2018 Dec;34(12):1711-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
5
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.疲劳测试后种植体基台的断裂强度:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14.
6
Evaluation of an endosseous oral implant system according to UNI EN ISO 14801 fatigue test protocol.根据UNI EN ISO 14801疲劳试验方案对一种骨内口腔种植体系统进行评估。
Implant Dent. 2014 Dec;23(6):665-71. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000151.
7
Cross-sectional design and fatigue durability of cantilevered sections of fixed implant-supported prostheses.
J Prosthodont. 1995 Sep;4(3):188-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1995.tb00339.x.
8
Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.种植体支持式修复体的循环加载:部件贴合度随时间的变化。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):346-51. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.71.
9
Random spectrum loading of dental implants: An alternative approach to functional performance assessment.牙种植体的随机频谱加载:功能性能评估的一种替代方法。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.030. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter.单牙种植基台系统的负载疲劳性能:直径的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):929-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Non-Engaging Abutment and Screw in Internal Implant Systems: Comparative Fatigue and Load Testing.新型非啮合基台和内种植系统中螺钉的生物力学评估:疲劳与载荷对比测试
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Mar 19;16(3):107. doi: 10.3390/jfb16030107.
2
The Fracture Resistance Comparison between Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments with and without Ageing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.有或无老化情况下钛和氧化锆种植体基台的抗折性比较:系统评价与Meta分析
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 23;12(9):274. doi: 10.3390/dj12090274.
3
Biomechanical Fatigue Behavior of a Dental Implant Due to Chewing Forces: A Finite Element Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications of screw- and cement-retained implant-supported full-arch restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.螺钉和粘结剂固位的种植体支持全颌修复体并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13(1):11-40.
2
Comparison of technical, biological, and esthetic parameters of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.陶瓷和金属陶瓷种植体支持的固定义齿的技术、生物学和美观参数比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):26-35.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
3
Fatigue Assessment Strategy Using Bayesian Techniques.
咀嚼力作用下牙种植体的生物力学疲劳行为:有限元分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 5;17(7):1669. doi: 10.3390/ma17071669.
4
Influence of Narrow Titanium Dental Implant Diameter on Fatigue Behavior: A Comparison between Unitary and Splinted Implants.窄直径钛制牙种植体对疲劳行为的影响:一体式与联冠式种植体的比较
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 13;13(6):1632. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061632.
5
Does the index in Morse taper connection affect the abutment stability? An in vitro experimental study.莫氏锥度连接中的锥度指数会影响基台稳定性吗?一项体外实验研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0298462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298462. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of Ultrasonic Surface Mechanical Attrition Treatment-Induced Nanograins on the Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Pure Titanium.超声表面机械研磨处理诱导纳米晶粒对纯钛力学性能和生物相容性的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;15(15):5097. doi: 10.3390/ma15155097.
7
Preparation and characterization of scutellarin loaded on ultradeformable nano-liposomes scutellarin EDTMP (S-UNL-E) and in vitro study of its osteogenesis.灯盏花素载于超变形纳米脂质体灯盏花素 EDTMP(S-UNL-E)的制备及表征及其成骨作用的体外研究。
Bioengineered. 2022 Jan;13(1):1013-1024. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2016095.
使用贝叶斯技术的疲劳评估策略
Materials (Basel). 2019 Oct 3;12(19):3239. doi: 10.3390/ma12193239.
4
Load-Bearing Capacity and Retention of Newly Developed Micro-Locking Implant Prosthetic System: An In Vitro Pilot Study.新型微锁定种植修复系统的承载能力与固位:一项体外初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2018 Apr 6;11(4):564. doi: 10.3390/ma11040564.
5
Finite element analysis of dental implants with validation: to what extent can we expect the model to predict biological phenomena? A literature review and proposal for classification of a validation process.具有验证的牙种植体有限元分析:我们能在多大程度上期望模型预测生物学现象?文献综述及验证过程分类建议。
Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Mar 8;4(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0119-5.
6
Ultimate force and stiffness of 2-piece zirconium dioxide implants with screw-retained monolithic lithium-disilicate reconstructions.两段式氧化锆种植体的最大固位力和刚度,以及螺丝固位式整体氧化锂硅玻璃陶瓷修复体。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Apr;62(2):258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
ADM guidance-ceramics: Fatigue principles and testing.ADM 指导陶瓷:疲劳原理与测试。
Dent Mater. 2017 Nov;33(11):1192-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
8
An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants.内连接型种植体中不同可互换基台松动的体外评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):350-355. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5295.
9
Mechanical Reliability Evaluation of an Oral Implant-Abutment System According to UNI EN ISO 14801 Fatigue Test Protocol.根据UNI EN ISO 14801疲劳试验协议对口腔种植体-基台系统进行机械可靠性评估。
Implant Dent. 2016 Oct;25(5):613-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000453.
10
Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.疲劳测试后种植体基台的断裂强度:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Sep;62:333-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 14.