University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):NP2749-NP2772. doi: 10.1177/0886260518769352. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Instances of gender-based violence (GBV) on university campuses are rarely reported to the authorities. This makes it difficult to gauge the prevalence of this problem, which in turn affects efforts for prevention. This article describes a university-wide online survey aimed at assessing, first, the prevalence of GBV experienced by the three sectors in the community-students, academic and research staff, and professional/administrative staff. Many of the findings concurred with research elsewhere-students were the predominant victims of GBV; men were the main perpetrators; and instances of rape occurred mainly when the victim/survivor was under the influence of alcohol or drugs. In contrast to some of the more well-known U.S. surveys (e.g., Georgetown University), we found relatively few instances of students being exploited by staff members. Occurrences of contrapower harassment were also reported in our survey. The second aim investigated whether rape myth acceptance was related to experiences of GBV. We found that women who had these experiences were more rejecting of rape myths than women who had not had such experiences. The opposite was found for White men. White men who had experienced GBV were more accepting of the rape myths than those who had not had such experiences. It was suggested that this reflected a need for these male victims to establish their hegemonic masculine identity. In general, the level of rape myth acceptance was relatively low. This suggested that widespread victim-blame, and self-blame does not account for the low levels of GBV reports to officials. A limitation of the study was the relatively low response rate (1,350 respondents), which was likely caused by the student protests over university fees that were ongoing at the time of the survey. These protests caused considerable disturbance for all sectors of the university community.
大学校园内基于性别的暴力(GBV)事件很少向当局报告。这使得难以评估这个问题的普遍性,进而影响预防工作。本文描述了一项全大学范围的在线调查,旨在首先评估社区的三个群体——学生、学术和研究人员以及专业/行政人员——所经历的 GBV 的普遍性。许多发现与其他地方的研究一致——学生是 GBV 的主要受害者;男性是主要施害者;强奸事件主要发生在受害者/幸存者受到酒精或毒品影响的情况下。与一些更知名的美国调查(例如,乔治城大学)不同,我们发现很少有学生被工作人员剥削的例子。我们的调查还报告了对立权力骚扰的发生。第二个目的是调查强奸神话接受度是否与 GBV 经历有关。我们发现,有这些经历的女性比没有这些经历的女性更拒绝强奸神话。对于白人男性则相反。有过 GBV 经历的白人男性比没有过这种经历的男性更接受强奸神话。这反映了这些男性受害者需要确立他们的霸权男性身份的需求。总的来说,强奸神话接受度相对较低。这表明广泛的受害者指责和自责并不能解释向官员报告的 GBV 事件数量低的原因。这项研究的一个限制是相对较低的回复率(1350 名受访者),这可能是由于当时正在进行的大学学费抗议活动导致学生抗议,这给大学社区的所有群体都带来了相当大的干扰。