• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术相比,可减轻食管癌患者的术后炎症反应,提高生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。

Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

Clinical Trial Planning and Management, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4443-4450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6187-z. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6187-z
PMID:29644466
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for patients with esophageal cancer has recently spread worldwide. However, whether MIE is less invasive has not yet been fully evaluated.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 551 patients who underwent curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2005 to 2014: 145 patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and 406 patients underwent open transthoracic esophagectomy (OE). We compared postoperative CRP levels with propensity score matching. In addition, long-term outcomes were also compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly longer, and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIE group compared with the OE group. Although the incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups, postoperative serum CRP levels during the first 3 and 5 postoperative days and peak postoperative CRP levels were significantly lower after MIE versus OE (MIE vs. OE, median, 15.21 vs. 19.50 mg/dl; P < 0.001). The MIE group had significantly more favorable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates than the OE group (3-year DFS rate, 81.7 vs. 69.3%, log-rank P = 0.021; 3-year OS rate, 89.9 vs. 79.2%, log-rank P = 0.007). MIE was an independent prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer. The incidence of regional lymph node recurrence was lower in the MIE group.

CONCLUSIONS

MIE significantly attenuated postoperative serum CRP levels compared with OE. MIE could contribute to improved survival.

摘要

背景

对于食管癌患者,微创食管切除术(MIE)最近已在全球范围内得到推广。然而,MIE 是否具有更小的侵袭性尚未得到充分评估。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2005 年至 2014 年期间接受根治性食管癌切除术的 551 例患者的数据:145 例患者接受微创食管切除术(MIE),406 例患者接受经胸开放性食管切除术(OE)。我们通过倾向评分匹配比较术后 CRP 水平。此外,还比较了两组的长期结果。

结果

与 OE 组相比,MIE 组的手术时间明显更长,术中出血量明显更少。尽管两组术后并发症发生率相似,但 MIE 组术后第 3 天和第 5 天以及术后 CRP 峰值明显低于 OE 组(MIE 与 OE,中位数,15.21 与 19.50mg/dl;P<0.001)。MIE 组的无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)明显优于 OE 组(3 年 DFS 率,81.7%与 69.3%,对数秩 P=0.021;3 年 OS 率,89.9%与 79.2%,对数秩 P=0.007)。MIE 是食管癌患者的独立预后因素。MIE 组区域淋巴结复发率较低。

结论

与 OE 相比,MIE 明显降低了术后血清 CRP 水平。MIE 可能有助于改善生存。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术相比,可减轻食管癌患者的术后炎症反应,提高生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4443-4450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6187-z. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
2
Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.根治性食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的疗效、生活质量和生存率:手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.063. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
3
Minimally Invasive Open Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer or Cancer of the Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-term Survival Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis.微创经左胸入路 Ivor-Lewis 食管癌切除术或胃食管结合部癌切除术:采用倾向评分匹配分析比较术后结果和长期生存。
Anticancer Res. 2021 Jul;41(7):3499-3510. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15137.
4
Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.手术入路对食管癌食管切除术围手术期和长期结果的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1892-1900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5881-6. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.荷兰开放性与微创经胸食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):839-846. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002393.
6
Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.手术方式重要吗?比较机器人、微创和开放性食管切除术的生存情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.039. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.利用日本全国性数据库对开放式与微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期结局进行比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1821-1827. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.食管癌切除术后的生存情况:不同手术方式的倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;104(4):1138-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.065. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.胸腔镜与开放 McKeown 食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb;113(2):473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
10
Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.胸腔镜下食管癌手术在俯卧位的低侵袭性:胸腔镜与开放食管癌手术手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1945-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5888-z. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective comparative study of video- and robot-assisted esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.新辅助放化疗后局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的电视辅助与机器人辅助食管切除术的回顾性比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12043-2.
2
Survival Comparison Between Open and Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stratified by Pathological Tumor-Node-Metastasis Stage: An Overlap Weighting Analysis.根据病理肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期分层的开放性与胸腔镜下食管癌切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的生存比较:重叠加权分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17567-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.胸腔镜下食管癌手术在俯卧位的低侵袭性:胸腔镜与开放食管癌手术手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1945-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5888-z. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.荷兰开放性与微创经胸食管切除术的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):839-846. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002393.
3
The learning curve for laparoscopic-assisted single-port mediastinoscopic esophagectomy: an analysis of proficiency.
腹腔镜辅助单孔纵隔镜下食管切除术的学习曲线:熟练度分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02772-5.
4
Early Postoperative Serum Lactate Levels Predict Anastomotic Leakage After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.术后早期血清乳酸水平可预测微创食管切除术后吻合口漏。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):834-840. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16534-9. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
5
Survival comparison between open and thoracoscopic esophagectomy for node-negative esophageal squamous cell cancer: an ambispective cohort study.开放性与胸腔镜下食管切除术治疗淋巴结阴性食管鳞状细胞癌的生存比较:一项双向队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7341-7351. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11302-y. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
6
Short-term outcomes of three- and two-field lymphadenectomy with minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis.食管癌微创食管切除术三野和二野淋巴结清扫的短期结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):3437-3445. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-2356. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
7
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer (NST 1502): a multicenter prospective cohort study.可切除胸段食管癌的微创与开放食管切除术(NST 1502):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2023 Feb 10;3(2):106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.02.002. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
A comparative assessment of ACS NSQIP-predicted and actual surgical risk outcomes of robotic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma resection at a high volume institution.高容量机构行机器人经胸食管切除术治疗食管腺癌的 ACS NSQIP 预测与实际手术风险结果的比较评估。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 5;18(1):280. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02034-1.
9
Technical feasibility and oncological outcomes of robotic esophagectomy compared with conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy for clinical T3 or T4 locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人食管切除术与传统胸腔镜食管切除术治疗 T3 或 T4 局部进展期食管癌的技术可行性和肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3590-3601. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10872-1. Epub 2024 May 16.
10
Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌行微创与开放食管切除术的复发模式和长期生存比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1055-1065. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05615-x. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
食管癌切除术后的生存情况:不同手术方式的倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;104(4):1138-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.065. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
4
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.利用日本全国性数据库对开放式与微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期结局进行比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1821-1827. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5808-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan, 2009.2009年日本食管癌综合登记处
Esophagus. 2016;13:110-137. doi: 10.1007/s10388-016-0531-y. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
6
Postoperative Infectious Complications are Associated with Adverse Oncologic Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Preoperative Chemotherapy.术后感染性并发症与接受术前化疗的食管癌患者不良肿瘤学结局相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):2106-14. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5045-7. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
A randomized Phase III trial of thoracoscopic versus open esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1409.一项比较胸腔镜与开放食管切除术治疗胸段食管癌的随机III期试验:日本临床肿瘤学会研究JCOG1409。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;46(2):174-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv178. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications in 502 Patients With Surgically Resected Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Single-institution Study.502例手术切除食管鳞状细胞癌患者术后并发症的预后影响:一项单机构回顾性研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):305-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001510.
9
Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: impact on postoperative inflammatory and nutritional status.杂交微创食管癌切除术治疗癌症:对术后炎症和营养状况的影响
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Nov;29(8):1064-1070. doi: 10.1111/dote.12418. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
10
Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria.手术并发症的扩展Clavien-Dindo分类:日本临床肿瘤学会术后并发症标准
Surg Today. 2016 Jun;46(6):668-85. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x. Epub 2015 Aug 20.