Koskinen A, Numminen J, Markkola A, Karjalainen J, Karstila T, Seppälä M, Julkunen A, Lemmetyinen R, Pekkanen J, Rautiainen M, Dastidar P, Hytönen M, Toppila-Salmi S
1 Haartman Institute, Medicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 May;32(3):121-131. doi: 10.1177/1945892418762891. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Objectives The diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) and distinguishing it from allergic rhinitis is difficult. Yet, early detection of CRSsNP is important to prevent progressive and severe chronic rhinosinusitis. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy of symptoms, endoscopy, and imaging signs of CRSsNP and allergic rhinitis -only phenotypes. Setting Prospective controlled follow-up study. Participants Forty-two nonsmoking patients visiting tertiary care due to CRSsNP and 19 nonsmoking volunteer controls with allergic rhinitis filled a symptoms questionnaire and underwent nasal endoscopy off-seasonally. All CRSsNP patients underwent computed tomography scans of paranasal sinuses. All the allergic rhinitis control subjects and 14 of the CRSsNP patients underwent sinus magnetic resonance imaging. Results Radiologic Lund-Mackay score, duration of symptoms, visual analogue scale scores of symptoms, and Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 were significantly higher in the CRSsNP group compared to allergic rhinitis control group. These factors also correlated in part with each other. Endoscopic score did not correlate with other factors, nor did it differ between CRSsNP and allergic rhinitis groups. The highest area under curve value was demonstrated for visual analogue scale score of facial pain/pressure (0.93) and score ≥4/10 showed 60% sensitivity and 95% specificity for detecting CRSsNP group ( P < .001). Radiologic sign of obstructed osteomeatal complex showed 100% specificity and 38% sensitivity for detecting CRSsNP group ( P < .001). Conclusions CRSsNP phenotype could be primarily distinguished from allergic rhinitis by higher facial pain/pressure score and secondarily by radiologic sings of obstructed ostiomeatal complex and higher Lund-Mackay score. Endoscopic score has limited value in distinguishing CRSsNP from allergic rhinitis.
目的 无鼻息肉慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSsNP)的诊断以及将其与变应性鼻炎相鉴别存在困难。然而,CRSsNP的早期检测对于预防进展性和重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎很重要。我们的目的是比较CRSsNP与仅表现为变应性鼻炎的表型在症状、鼻内镜检查和影像学征象方面的诊断准确性。
设置 前瞻性对照随访研究。
参与者 42例因CRSsNP就诊于三级医疗机构的非吸烟患者和19例非吸烟变应性鼻炎志愿者对照者填写了症状问卷,并在非发病季节接受了鼻内镜检查。所有CRSsNP患者均接受了鼻窦计算机断层扫描。所有变应性鼻炎对照者和14例CRSsNP患者接受了鼻窦磁共振成像检查。
结果 与变应性鼻炎对照组相比,CRSsNP组的放射学Lund-Mackay评分、症状持续时间、症状视觉模拟量表评分和鼻窦结局测试22评分显著更高。这些因素之间也部分相关。鼻内镜评分与其他因素无关,CRSsNP组和变应性鼻炎组之间也无差异。面部疼痛/压痛视觉模拟量表评分的曲线下面积值最高(0.93),评分≥4/10对检测CRSsNP组的敏感性为60%,特异性为95%(P <.001)。阻塞性窦口鼻道复合体的放射学征象对检测CRSsNP组的特异性为100%,敏感性为38%(P <.001)。
结论 CRSsNP表型可主要通过较高的面部疼痛/压痛评分与变应性鼻炎相鉴别,其次可通过阻塞性窦口鼻道复合体的放射学征象和较高的Lund-Mackay评分来鉴别。鼻内镜评分在区分CRSsNP和变应性鼻炎方面价值有限。