• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁会跳过?利用气质来解释针对学龄前儿童的运动能力干预的不同结果。

Who SKIPS? Using Temperament to Explain Differential Outcomes of a Motor Competence Intervention for Preschoolers.

作者信息

Taunton Sally A, Mulvey Kelly Lynn, Brian Ali S

机构信息

a University of South Carolina.

b North Carolina State University.

出版信息

Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018 Jun;89(2):200-209. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1444256. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1080/02701367.2018.1444256
PMID:29648943
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although motor skill interventions often improve fundamental motor skills (FMS) during preschool, the extent of individual children's success in development of FMS still varies among children receiving the same intervention. Temperament is multifaceted and includes negative affect (high levels of frustration or anger), effortful control (focus, self-regulation, and concentration), and surgency (energy and activity level). Temperament often influences cognitive, social, and behavioral outcomes and may be a significant factor in the development of FMS. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of temperament on children's improvement in FMS within a gross motor intervention.

METHOD

Participants (N = 80; M = 55.36 months, SD = 6.99 months) completed the Test of Gross Motor Development-Second Edition prior to and after intervention. Teachers completed the Child Behavior Questionnaire-Very Short Form to examine each child's temperament. To account for possibility of a Type 1 error, we conducted 6 separate 2 (temperament variable: high, low) × 2 (treatment: intervention, control) analyses of covariance and examined posttest scores for locomotor and object-control skills with pretest scores as covariates among participants with high and low surgency, negative affect, and effortful control.

RESULTS

Results revealed children with low levels of negative affect and surgency and high levels of effortful control demonstrated greater gains (η = .05-.34) in both locomotor and object-control skills during motor skill intervention compared with their peers.

CONCLUSION

Providing interventions tailored to temperamental profiles could maximize gains in FMS through intervention.

摘要

目的

尽管运动技能干预通常能在学龄前阶段提高基本运动技能(FMS),但在接受相同干预的儿童中,个体儿童在FMS发展方面的成功程度仍存在差异。气质是多方面的,包括消极情绪(高水平的挫折感或愤怒)、努力控制(注意力、自我调节和专注力)和外向性(活力和活动水平)。气质常常影响认知、社交和行为结果,可能是FMS发展的一个重要因素。本研究的目的是在一项大肌肉运动干预中,考察气质对儿童FMS改善的影响。

方法

参与者(N = 80;M = 55.36个月,标准差 = 6.99个月)在干预前后完成了《大肌肉运动发展测试第二版》。教师完成了《儿童行为问卷简版》以考察每个儿童的气质。为了考虑I类错误的可能性,我们进行了6项独立的2(气质变量:高、低)×2(治疗:干预、对照)协方差分析,并以高、低外向性、消极情绪和努力控制的参与者的前测分数作为协变量,检查了运动和物体控制技能的后测分数。

结果

结果显示,消极情绪和外向性水平低且努力控制水平高的儿童在运动技能干预期间,与同龄人相比,在运动和物体控制技能方面都有更大的提高(η = 0.05 - 0.34)。

结论

提供针对气质特征量身定制的干预措施,可以通过干预使FMS的提高最大化。

相似文献

1
Who SKIPS? Using Temperament to Explain Differential Outcomes of a Motor Competence Intervention for Preschoolers.谁会跳过?利用气质来解释针对学龄前儿童的运动能力干预的不同结果。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018 Jun;89(2):200-209. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1444256. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
A Ball Skills Intervention in Preschoolers: The CHAMP Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对学龄前儿童的球类技能干预:CHAMP随机对照试验。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Nov;49(11):2234-2239. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001339.
3
The Motor skills At Playtime intervention improves children's locomotor skills: A feasibility study.游戏时间中的运动技能干预可提高儿童的动作技能:一项可行性研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 2020 Sep;46(5):599-606. doi: 10.1111/cch.12793. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing perceived motor competence in Portuguese children.一种用于评估葡萄牙儿童感知运动能力的图片工具的效度和信度。
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Sep;42(5):666-74. doi: 10.1111/cch.12359. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
5
Investigating the link between temperamental and motor development: a longitudinal study of infants aged 6-42 months.探究气质与运动发育之间的关系:6-42 月龄婴儿的纵向研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05038-w.
6
SKIPing With Head Start Teachers: Influence of T-SKIP on Object-Control Skills.与学前启智计划教师一起跳绳:T-SKIP对物体控制技能的影响。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017 Dec;88(4):479-491. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2017.1375077. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
Associations between skill perceptions and young children's actual fundamental movement skills.技能认知与幼儿实际基本运动技能之间的关联。
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Apr;120(2):591-603. doi: 10.2466/10.25.PMS.120v18x2. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
8
Temperament differences between institution- and family-reared toddlers.机构抚养和家庭抚养幼儿之间的气质差异。
Infant Behav Dev. 2016 Nov;45(Pt A):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Changes in Fundamental Motor-Skill Performance Following a Nine-Month Mastery Motivational Climate Intervention.九个月掌握式动机氛围干预后基本运动技能表现的变化。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Dec;90(4):517-526. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1628909. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Improving Early Adolescent Girls' Motor Skill: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.提高青春期早期女孩的运动技能:一项整群随机对照试验。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Dec;49(12):2498-2505. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001382.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Motor Competence on Broader Aspects of Health: A Systematic Review of the Longitudinal Associations Between Motor Competence and Cognitive and Social-Emotional Outcomes.运动能力对更广泛健康方面的影响:运动能力与认知和社会情感结果之间的纵向关联的系统评价。
Sports Med. 2024 Feb;54(2):375-427. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01939-5. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
2
Protocol for a quasi-experimental study examining the effect of a ball skills intervention on four domains of preschooler development.一项准实验研究方案,旨在考察球技干预对学龄前儿童四个发展领域的影响。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Nov 10;22:e69. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000645.
3
The Development of Motor and Pre-literacy Skills by a Physical Education Program in Preschool Children: A Non-randomized Pilot Trial.
一项针对学龄前儿童的体育教育计划对运动和读写前技能发展的影响:非随机试点试验
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 9;9:2694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02694. eCollection 2018.