Suppr超能文献

缺失数据处理很重要:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的多重插补分析。

Missing data treatments matter: an analysis of multiple imputation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, 800 Howard Ave, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):2009-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The presence of missing data is a limitation of large datasets, including the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). In addressing this issue, most studies use complete case analysis, which excludes cases with missing data, thus potentially introducing selection bias. Multiple imputation, a statistically rigorous approach that approximates missing data and preserves sample size, may be an improvement over complete case analysis.

PURPOSE

The present study aims to evaluate the impact of using multiple imputation in comparison with complete case analysis for assessing the associations between preoperative laboratory values and adverse outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing one-level ACDF were identified in NSQIP 2012-2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Perioperative adverse outcome variables assessed included the occurrence of any adverse event, severe adverse events, and hospital readmission.

METHODS

Missing preoperative albumin and hematocrit values were handled using complete case analysis and multiple imputation. These preoperative laboratory levels were then tested for associations with 30-day postoperative outcomes using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 11,999 patients were included. Of this cohort, 63.5% of patients had missing preoperative albumin and 9.9% had missing preoperative hematocrit. When using complete case analysis, only 4,311 patients were studied. The removed patients were significantly younger, healthier, of a common body mass index, and male. Logistic regression analysis failed to identify either preoperative hypoalbuminemia or preoperative anemia as significantly associated with adverse outcomes. When employing multiple imputation, all 11,999 patients were included. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of any adverse event and severe adverse events. Preoperative anemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of any adverse event, severe adverse events, and hospital readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple imputation is a rigorous statistical procedure that is being increasingly used to address missing values in large datasets. Using this technique for ACDF avoided the loss of cases that may have affected the representativeness and power of the study and led to different results than complete case analysis. Multiple imputation should be considered for future spine studies.

摘要

背景

大量数据集(包括国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP))存在数据缺失的问题。在解决这个问题时,大多数研究使用完整病例分析,排除了缺失数据的病例,因此可能会引入选择偏倚。多重插补是一种统计上严格的方法,它可以近似缺失数据并保留样本量,可能比完整病例分析有所改进。

目的

本研究旨在评估与完整病例分析相比,使用多重插补评估术前实验室值与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后不良结局之间关联的影响。

研究设计/设置:这是一项前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究。

患者样本

在 NSQIP 2012-2015 年期间,确定接受单节段 ACDF 的患者。

结局测量

评估围手术期不良结局变量包括任何不良事件、严重不良事件和医院再入院。

方法

使用完整病例分析和多重插补处理缺失的术前白蛋白和血细胞比容值。然后使用逻辑回归测试这些术前实验室水平与 30 天术后结局的相关性。

结果

共纳入 11999 例患者。其中,63.5%的患者术前白蛋白缺失,9.9%的患者术前血细胞比容缺失。使用完整病例分析时,仅研究了 4311 例患者。被排除的患者年龄明显更小,更健康,体重指数更常见,且为男性。逻辑回归分析未发现术前低白蛋白血症或术前贫血与不良结局显著相关。当采用多重插补时,所有 11999 例患者均被纳入。术前低白蛋白血症与任何不良事件和严重不良事件的发生显著相关。术前贫血与任何不良事件、严重不良事件和医院再入院显著相关。

结论

多重插补是一种严格的统计程序,越来越多地用于处理大型数据集的缺失值。在 ACDF 中使用该技术避免了可能影响研究代表性和效力的病例丢失,并导致与完整病例分析不同的结果。多重插补应考虑用于未来的脊柱研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验