• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童的视觉空间偏差:来自三维空间中线平分任务的证据。

Visuospatial biases in preschool children: Evidence from line bisection in three-dimensional space.

作者信息

Patro Katarzyna, Nuerk Hans-Christoph, Brugger Peter

机构信息

Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; Knowledge Media Research Center, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.002
PMID:29649699
Abstract

Spatial attention in adults is characterized by systematic asymmetries across all three spatial dimensions. These asymmetries are evident when participants bisect horizontal, vertical, or radial lines and misplace their midpoints to the left, the top, or far from the body, respectively. However, bisection errors are rarely examined during early childhood. In this study, we examined the development of spatial-attentional asymmetries in three-dimensional (3D) space by asking preschool children (aged 3-6 years) to bisect horizontal, vertical, and radial lines. Children erred to the left with horizontal lines and to the top with vertical lines, consistent with the pattern reported in adults. These biases got stronger with age and were absent in the youngest preschoolers. However, by controlling for a possible failure in hitting the line, we observed an additional unpredicted pattern: Children's pointing systematically deviated away from the line to an empty space on its left side (for vertical and radial lines) or above it (for horizontal lines). Notably, this task-irrelevant deviation was pronounced in children as young as 3 or 4 years. We conclude that asymmetries in spatial-attentional functions should be measured not only in task-relevant dimensions but also in task-irrelevant dimensions because the latter may reveal biases in very young children not typically observed in task-relevant measures.

摘要

成年人的空间注意力在所有三个空间维度上都具有系统性的不对称特征。当参与者平分水平、垂直或径向线,并分别将中点错置于左侧、顶部或远离身体的位置时,这些不对称就很明显了。然而,在幼儿期很少研究平分误差。在本研究中,我们通过让学龄前儿童(3至6岁)平分水平、垂直和径向线,研究了三维(3D)空间中空间注意力不对称的发展情况。儿童在平分水平线时向左出错,平分垂直线时向上出错,这与成年人中报告的模式一致。这些偏差随着年龄的增长而增强,最年幼的学龄前儿童中不存在这种偏差。然而,通过控制可能未击中线条的情况,我们观察到了另一种意外模式:儿童的指向系统性地偏离线条,指向其左侧(对于垂直和径向线)或上方(对于水平线)的空白空间。值得注意的是,这种与任务无关的偏差在3岁或4岁的儿童中就很明显。我们得出结论,空间注意力功能的不对称不仅应在与任务相关的维度上进行测量,还应在与任务无关的维度上进行测量,因为后者可能揭示出在与任务相关的测量中通常未观察到的幼儿的偏差。

相似文献

1
Visuospatial biases in preschool children: Evidence from line bisection in three-dimensional space.学龄前儿童的视觉空间偏差:来自三维空间中线平分任务的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
2
Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.右手使用者在直线二等分判断中的假性忽视与右半球空间注意优势的调节有关。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.假性忽视中基线方向差异对注意力分散的影响。
Cortex. 2016 Apr;77:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
4
Attentional bias in the radial and vertical dimensions of space.空间径向和垂直维度上的注意偏向。
C R Biol. 2019 Mar-May;342(3-4):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
5
Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.视觉和听觉的空间注意偏差。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Aug;73(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
6
The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.集中和持续的空间注意力对空间注意力分配的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jan;25(1):65-71. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000802. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Gaze data of 4243 participants shows link between leftward and superior attention biases and age.4243 名参与者的注视数据显示,左视和上视注意力偏向与年龄有关。
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jun;242(6):1327-1337. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06823-w. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
8
Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.右偏置车道保持在年轻和年长的英国司机中。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 6;13(9):e0203549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203549. eCollection 2018.
9
More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.越远越正确:手动和视觉线平分任务,但不是贾德错觉,取决于径向空间。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Apr;122:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.认知和感知对视觉直线二等分的影响:假性忽视的心理物理学和计时分析
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Mar;35(3):369-80. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00143-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental Changes in Neural Lateralization for Visual-Spatial Function? Evidence From a Line-Bisection Task.视觉空间功能的神经偏侧化发育变化?来自直线二等分任务的证据。
Dev Sci. 2025 Sep;28(5):e70060. doi: 10.1111/desc.70060.
2
Iconic Mathematics: Math Designed to Suit the Mind.标志性数学:为契合思维而设计的数学。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 13;13:890362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.890362. eCollection 2022.
3
Developmental changes in neural lateralization for visual-spatial function: Evidence from a line-bisection task.视空间功能的神经侧化发展变化:来自横竖线交叉任务的证据。
Dev Sci. 2022 Jul;25(4):e13217. doi: 10.1111/desc.13217. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Spatial attention and representation of time intervals in childhood.儿童的空间注意和时间间隔的表示。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 11;10(1):14960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71541-6.