Suppr超能文献

集中和持续的空间注意力对空间注意力分配的影响。

The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.

机构信息

1Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center,Gainesville, FL.

5College of Medicine,University of Florida,Gainesville, FL.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jan;25(1):65-71. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000802. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of directed and sustained attention on the allocation of visuospatial attention. Healthy people often have left lateral and upward vertical spatial attentional biases. However, it is not known whether there will be an increase in bias toward the attended portion of the stimulus when volitional spatial attention is allocated to a portion of a stimulus, whether there are asymmetrical spatial alterations of these biases, and how sustained attention influences these biases.

METHODS

We assessed spatial bias in 36 healthy, right-handed participants using a variant of horizontal and vertical line bisections. Participants were asked to focus on one or the other end of vertical or horizontal lines or entire vertical or horizontal lines, and then to bisect the line either immediately or after a 20 second delay.

RESULTS

We found a significant main effect of attentional focus and an interaction between attentional focus and prolonged viewing with delayed bisection. Focusing on a certain portion of the line resulting in a significant deviation toward the attended portion and prolonged viewing of the line prior to bisection significantly enhanced the degree of deviation toward the attended portion.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhanced bias with directed and sustained attention may be useful modifications of the line bisection test, particularly in clinical populations. Thus, future studies should determine whether prolonged viewing with delayed bisection and spatially focused attention reveals attentional biases in patients with hemispheric lesions who perform normally on the traditional line bisection test. (JINS, 2019, 25, 65-71).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估定向和持续注意力对视觉空间注意力分配的影响。健康人通常具有左侧和向上的垂直空间注意力偏向。然而,当自愿空间注意力分配到刺激的一部分时,是否会增加对刺激的注意部分的偏向,是否存在这些偏向的不对称空间改变,以及持续注意力如何影响这些偏向,这些问题尚不清楚。

方法

我们使用水平和垂直线二分法的变体评估了 36 名健康右利手参与者的空间偏向。要求参与者专注于垂直线或水平线的一端或另一端,或者整个垂直线或水平线,然后立即或在 20 秒延迟后对线条进行二分。

结果

我们发现注意力焦点有显著的主要影响,以及注意力焦点和延长观察与延迟二分之间的相互作用。专注于线的某一部分会导致明显偏向于注意部分,并且在二分之前延长对线的观察会显著增强偏向于注意部分的程度。

结论

定向和持续注意力的增强偏向可能是线二分测试的有用修改,特别是在临床人群中。因此,未来的研究应该确定延长观察与延迟二分和空间聚焦注意力是否会揭示在传统线二分测试中表现正常的半球损伤患者的注意力偏向。(JINS,2019,25,65-71)。

相似文献

1
The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jan;25(1):65-71. doi: 10.1017/S1355617718000802. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
2
Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Aug;79(3):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
4
Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jun;37(7):843-55. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00140-7.
5
Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
Brain Cogn. 2010 Aug;73(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 20.
6
Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:565-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
Visuospatial biases in preschool children: Evidence from line bisection in three-dimensional space.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Weight and see: Line bisection in neglect reliably measures the allocation of attention, but not the perception of length.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:146-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 8;94:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.024. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
Cortex. 2016 Apr;77:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
Motion-induced blindness and Troxler fading: common and different mechanisms.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092894. eCollection 2014.
6
Bottom-up and top-down attention: different processes and overlapping neural systems.
Neuroscientist. 2014 Oct;20(5):509-21. doi: 10.1177/1073858413514136. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
7
A functional hierarchy within the parietofrontal network in stimulus selection and attention control.
J Neurosci. 2013 May 8;33(19):8359-69. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4058-12.2013.
8
Vertical line quadrisection: "what" it represents and who gets the upper hand.
Brain Lang. 2013 Nov;127(2):284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
9
Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
Brain Cogn. 2012 Aug;79(3):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
10
Motion-induced blindness and microsaccades: cause and effect.
J Vis. 2010 Dec 20;10(14):22. doi: 10.1167/10.14.22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验