Department of Science Communication, Faculty for Humanities and Social Sciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Englerstraße 2, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research, Wollongong, Australia.
Environ Health. 2018 Apr 12;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0377-y.
Regarding electromagnetic fields from mobile communication technologies, empirical studies have shown that precautionary information given to lay recipients increases their risk perceptions, i.e. the belief that electromagnetic fields are dangerous. Taking this finding one step further, the current study investigates whether precautionary information also leads to higher symptom perceptions in an alleged exposure situation. Building on existing research on nocebo responses to sham electromagnetic fields, an interaction of the precautionary information with personality characteristics was hypothesised.
An experimental design with sham exposure to an electromagnetic field of a WLAN device was deployed. The final sample is constituted by N = 137 participants. Participants received either only basic information about the safety of current WLAN exposure limits or in addition also precautionary information (e.g. 'prefer wired connections if wireless technology can be relinquished'). Subsequently, symptoms and other variables were assessed before and after sham exposure to a WLAN electromagnetic field.
Results are not in favour of the hypothesised effects. There was neither a main effect of precautionary information, nor were there any of the hypothesised interaction effects of precautionary information and personality characteristics on perceived symptoms under sham exposure. Exploratory analyses highlight the role of prior risk perception as a predictor of nocebo responses, and of symptom expectations as a mediator between these two variables.
As the statistical power to detect even small effects was relatively high, we interpret this as a robust indication that precautionary information does not lead to increased nocebo responses by itself. The implications for health authorities´ communication with the public are discussed.
关于移动通信技术的电磁场,实证研究表明,向非专业人士提供预防信息会增加他们的风险感知,即认为电磁场是危险的。在此基础上更进一步,当前的研究调查了在所谓的暴露情况下,预防信息是否也会导致更高的症状感知。基于对虚假电磁场产生的安慰剂反应的现有研究,假设了预防信息与个性特征之间的相互作用。
采用实验设计,对 WLAN 设备的电磁场进行了虚假暴露。最终样本由 N=137 名参与者组成。参与者要么只接受有关当前 WLAN 暴露限值安全性的基本信息,要么除了基本信息外还接受预防信息(例如,如果可以放弃无线技术,则“首选有线连接”)。随后,在对 WLAN 电磁场进行虚假暴露之前和之后评估了症状和其他变量。
结果不支持假设的效果。预防信息既没有主效应,也没有预防信息与个性特征之间的假设交互效应,对虚假暴露下的感知症状有影响。探索性分析突出了先前风险感知作为安慰剂反应的预测因子的作用,以及症状预期作为这两个变量之间的中介的作用。
由于检测即使是小效应的统计功效也相对较高,我们将其解释为预防信息本身不会导致增加的安慰剂反应的有力迹象。讨论了这对健康当局与公众沟通的影响。