• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网站的射频电磁场风险沟通对公众的影响。

Effects of website-based risk communication of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields on general public.

机构信息

National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Koganei, Japan.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;12:1438986. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438986. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438986
PMID:39296830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11408325/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) are utilized in communications and appliances and are indispensable in daily life. However, some people have concerns about the adverse health effects of RF-EMFs; therefore, effective risk communication (RC) is needed in this field.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigate public attitudes towards RF-EMFs and examine the impact of RC via a website on these attitudes and objective knowledge.

METHODS

Three web surveys were conducted over 10 weeks with the same participants. The questionnaires were conducted at three different time points with 5-week intervals: baseline survey (T1), RC evaluation survey (T2), and follow-up survey (T3). Participants of T2 were randomly recruited from among those of T1, and participants of T3 were randomly selected from among the T2 respondents. Approximately half of the respondents in each of T2 and T3 were assigned to the control group. Twelve items regarding attitudes toward RF-EMFs and objective knowledge were evaluated in all surveys (T1-T3). After removing low-engagement data, the number of valid answers was 782 in T3. Differences between T1 and T2 (Sub T1-T2) and T1 and T3 (Sub T1-T3) were analyzed. Participant selection was randomized and the authors were blind to this selection until analysis.

RESULTS

Four clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (Non-anxious, 25.0%), Cluster 2 (Anxious, 16.0%), Cluster 3 (Low-interest, 40.5%), and Cluster 4 (High-interest, 18.5%). A decrease in subjective RF-EMF exposure levels was noted in Cluster 2 immediately after website viewing. Temporary increases and decreases in health concerns about RF-EMF usage activities were observed in Clusters 1 and 2, respectively, immediately after viewing. Clusters 1 and 3 showed a temporal decrease in needs for RF-EMF usage activities at T2 but it returned to the baseline level 5 weeks later. Cluster 4 was less responsive to the risk communication. Subanalysis stratified by gender and age showed fluctuations in responses, especially in Clusters 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate the effectiveness of RF-EMF risk communication via websites, particularly for Cluster 2. The results of this study showed that offering objective and comprehensible information through a website can significantly reduce concerns and perceived risks related to RF-EMFs.

摘要

背景

射频电磁场(RF-EMF)用于通信和电器,在日常生活中不可或缺。然而,有些人对 RF-EMF 的不良健康影响表示担忧,因此该领域需要进行有效的风险沟通(RC)。

目的

本研究旨在调查公众对 RF-EMF 的态度,并通过网站评估 RC 对这些态度和客观知识的影响。

方法

在 10 周内进行了 3 次网络调查,使用相同的参与者。问卷在三个不同的时间点进行,间隔 5 周:基线调查(T1)、RC 评估调查(T2)和随访调查(T3)。T2 的参与者是从 T1 中随机招募的,T3 的参与者是从 T2 的受访者中随机选择的。T2 和 T3 中的大约一半参与者被分配到对照组。所有调查(T1-T3)都评估了 12 项对 RF-EMF 的态度和客观知识项目。在去除低参与度数据后,T3 的有效答案数量为 782。分析了 T1 和 T2(Sub T1-T2)以及 T1 和 T3(Sub T1-T3)之间的差异。参与者的选择是随机的,作者在分析之前对此选择并不知情。

结果

确定了 4 个聚类:聚类 1(非焦虑,25.0%)、聚类 2(焦虑,16.0%)、聚类 3(低兴趣,40.5%)和聚类 4(高兴趣,18.5%)。在网站浏览后,聚类 2 中立即观察到主观 RF-EMF 暴露水平降低。在网站浏览后,聚类 1 和 2 中分别观察到对 RF-EMF 使用活动的健康关注度暂时增加和减少。聚类 1 和 3 在 T2 时显示出对 RF-EMF 使用活动的需求随时间减少,但 5 周后恢复到基线水平。聚类 4 对风险沟通的反应较小。按性别和年龄分层的亚分析显示,尤其是聚类 1 和 2,反应波动较大。

结论

我们通过网站展示了 RF-EMF 风险沟通的有效性,特别是对聚类 2。本研究结果表明,通过网站提供客观和易于理解的信息,可以显著降低与 RF-EMF 相关的担忧和感知风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/efd1fd51c2d9/fpubh-12-1438986-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/95e67bc1e2fb/fpubh-12-1438986-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/ec4ea5765e3e/fpubh-12-1438986-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/efd1fd51c2d9/fpubh-12-1438986-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/95e67bc1e2fb/fpubh-12-1438986-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/ec4ea5765e3e/fpubh-12-1438986-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eced/11408325/efd1fd51c2d9/fpubh-12-1438986-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of website-based risk communication of radio-frequency electromagnetic fields on general public.基于网站的射频电磁场风险沟通对公众的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;12:1438986. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1438986. eCollection 2024.
2
Time course of health complaints attributed to RF-EMF exposure and predictors of electromagnetic hypersensitivity over 10 years in a prospective cohort of Dutch adults.归因于射频电磁场暴露的健康投诉的时间进程以及 10 年内荷兰成年人前瞻性队列中电磁超敏反应的预测因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 15;856(Pt 2):159240. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159240. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
RF EMF Risk Perception Revisited: Is the Focus on Concern Sufficient for Risk Perception Studies?再谈射频电磁场风险认知:关注担忧对于风险认知研究是否足够?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 8;14(6):620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060620.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Cohort study on the effects of everyday life radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure on non-specific symptoms and tinnitus.队列研究日常生活射频电磁场暴露对非特异性症状和耳鸣的影响。
Environ Int. 2012 Jan;38(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
6
Exposure Knowledge and Perception of Wireless Communication Technologies.无线通信技术的暴露知识与认知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 6;12(11):14177-91. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114177.
7
A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure.个人射频电磁场暴露预测模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Dec 15;408(1):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.023. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
8
Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and risk perception: A pilot experimental study.射频电磁场暴露与风险感知:一项初步实验研究。
Environ Res. 2019 Mar;170:493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.058. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
9
Pilot study of a new methodology to study the development of the blue bottle fly () under exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields at 5.4 GHz.5.4GHz 射频电磁场暴露下蓝瓶果蝇()发育研究新方法的初步研究。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2023;99(9):1439-1455. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2022.2113838. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Personal Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields among Australian Adults.澳大利亚成年人的射频电磁辐射个人暴露水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 12;15(10):2234. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102234.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of generalization descriptions on risk perception.概括性描述对风险认知的影响。
Environ Res. 2023 Apr 15;223:115422. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115422. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Comments on "What is the radiation before 5G? A correlation study between measurements in situ and in real time and epidemiological indicators in Vallecas, Madrid".对《5G 之前的辐射是什么?马德里巴列卡斯的现场实时测量与流行病学指标之间的相关性研究》的评论
Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt C):113314. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113314. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Radiofrequency Exposure Levels from Mobile Phone Base Stations in Outdoor Environments and an Underground Shopping Mall in Japan.
日本户外环境和地下购物中心的移动电话基站射频辐射暴露水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158068.
4
Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.危害识别、风险特征描述和风险保护中不确定性描述沟通的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):e0253762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253762. eCollection 2021.
5
Wi-fi related radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF): a pilot experimental study of personal exposure and risk perception.与Wi-Fi相关的射频电磁场(RF-EMF):个人暴露与风险认知的初步实验研究。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2021 Mar 23;19(1):671-680. doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00636-7. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
The Relationship between Risk Perception of Cell Phones and Objective Knowledge of EMF in Korea.韩国手机辐射风险认知与 EMF 客观知识之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;17(19):7207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197207.
7
Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).电磁场暴露限制导则(100 kHz 至 300 GHz)。
Health Phys. 2020 May;118(5):483-524. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210.
8
Characterisation of personal exposure to environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in Albacete (Spain) and assessment of risk perception.在西班牙阿尔瓦塞特进行的环境射频电磁场个人暴露特征描述及风险感知评估。
Environ Res. 2019 May;172:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and risk perception: A pilot experimental study.射频电磁场暴露与风险感知:一项初步实验研究。
Environ Res. 2019 Mar;170:493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.058. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
10
Developing a Broadly Applicable Measure of Risk Perception.开发一种广泛适用的风险感知衡量标准。
Risk Anal. 2019 Apr;39(4):777-791. doi: 10.1111/risa.13207. Epub 2018 Oct 2.