• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床检查中的沟通与伦理

Communication and Ethics in the Clinical Examination.

作者信息

Onguti Sharon, Mathew Sherine, Todd Christine

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, SIU Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, 801 North Rutledge, PO Box 19628, Springfield, IL 62794-9628, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, SIU Medicine, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, 801 North Rutledge, PO Box 19628, Springfield, IL 62794-9628, USA.

出版信息

Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;102(3):485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.010
PMID:29650070
Abstract

At the heart of every effective patient-physician interaction is a relationship that is built on trust. Cultivating sound communication skills coupled with the awareness and application of ethical principles is integral to this process. One of the foremost challenges in competent practice is negotiating situations that arise at the bedside when such issues as patient autonomy, differing world views, honesty, and cost stewardship come into conflict. It is essential for health care providers to consider how to detect and prioritize these issues as they advocate for high-quality and patient-centered care.

摘要

每一次有效的医患互动的核心都是建立在信任基础上的关系。培养良好的沟通技巧,以及对伦理原则的认识和应用,是这一过程不可或缺的一部分。在胜任本职工作方面,最主要的挑战之一是处理床边出现的各种情况,比如患者自主权、不同的世界观、诚实以及成本管理等问题发生冲突时的情况。对于医疗服务提供者来说,在倡导高质量和以患者为中心的护理时,考虑如何发现这些问题并确定其优先顺序至关重要。

相似文献

1
Communication and Ethics in the Clinical Examination.临床检查中的沟通与伦理
Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;102(3):485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.010.
2
Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice.临床伦理学原则及其在实践中的应用。
Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):17-28. doi: 10.1159/000509119. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Beneficence and autonomy in health care.医疗保健中的善行与自主性。
Humane Med. 1987 Nov;3(2):93-8.
4
Identifying and managing ethical conflict in the gynecologist-patient relationship.识别并处理妇产科医生与患者关系中的伦理冲突。
J Reprod Med. 1993 Jul;38(7):533-7.
5
Educational pelvic exams on anesthetized women: Why consent matters.对麻醉状态下女性进行的教育性盆腔检查:为何同意至关重要。
Bioethics. 2018 Jun;32(5):298-307. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12441. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
6
Improving informed consent in percutaneous coronary revascularisation.提高经皮冠状动脉血运重建术的知情同意水平。
EuroIntervention. 2012 May 15;8(1):146-54. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I1A22.
7
Case vignette: placebos and informed consent.病例 vignette:安慰剂与知情同意。
Ethics Behav. 1998;8(1):89-98. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0801_8.
8
Informed consent-It's more than a signature on a piece of paper.知情同意——它远不止是在一张纸上签名。
Am J Surg. 2017 Dec;214(6):993-997. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
The physician as caregiver and researcher.身为照顾者与研究者的医生。
Thyroidology. 1993 Dec;5(3):73-6.
10
Microethics: the ethics of everyday clinical practice.微观伦理学:日常临床实践中的伦理学。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 Jan-Feb;45(1):11-7. doi: 10.1002/hast.413.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.通过将伦理维度纳入重大事件报告系统来提高患者安全。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00593-8.
2
Patient-Physician Interaction and Trust in Online Health Community: The Role of Perceived Usefulness of Health Information and Services.医患互动与在线健康社区中的信任:健康信息和服务感知有用性的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010139.
3
Response to "Emerging Roles of Virtual Patients in the Age of AI".
对《人工智能时代虚拟患者的新角色》的回应
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):E920-925. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.920.
4
Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Patient and physician communication challenges and shared decision making.胃食管反流病的管理:患者与医生沟通面临的挑战及共同决策
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 6;6(15):892-900. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i15.892.