Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Sep;27(9):737-742. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007380. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
There are many challenges in the development, implementation and evaluation of healthcare policy. One challenge is understanding how different stakeholders view a particular policy and what impact these views may have during implementation. Q-methodology is one approach that can be used to help policy makers and researchers actively engage with those who are important in policy implementation, and anticipate their responses. Q-methodology combines qualitative and quantitative research methods to systematically explore and describe the range of viewpoints about a topic. Participants are required to rank a set of predefined statements relating to the topic, according to their own viewpoint. Factor analytic techniques then identify people who are like-minded in the way they view the topic and enable areas of consensus and divergence in viewpoint to be clearly defined. This mapping of viewpoints allows those working in policy implementation to anticipate likely barriers and levers in implementing new policies.
在医疗政策的制定、实施和评估中存在诸多挑战。其中一个挑战是了解不同利益相关者如何看待某项政策,以及这些观点在实施过程中可能产生的影响。Q 方法是一种可以帮助政策制定者和研究人员积极与政策实施过程中的重要人员接触并预测他们反应的方法。Q 方法将定性和定量研究方法相结合,系统地探索和描述了对某一主题的不同观点。参与者需要根据自己的观点,对与主题相关的一组预先定义的陈述进行排序。然后,因子分析技术确定了在看待主题方面观点相似的人群,并能够明确界定观点的共识和分歧领域。这种观点的映射使从事政策实施的人员能够预测在实施新政策时可能遇到的障碍和推动因素。