Do Michael, Kirkovski Melissa, Davies Charlotte B, Bekkali Soukayna, Byrne Linda K, Enticott Peter G
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Mar 29;12:123. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00123. eCollection 2018.
Human responses to non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques can be highly variable. Recently, priming protocols involving a conditioning round of NIBS applied to a target brain region prior to the application of a test protocol have shown promise in inducing more reliable effects. We investigated whether intra- or inter-regional priming of the left primary motor cortex (M1) using continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can induce consistent, and reliable modulation of corticospinal excitability. Twenty healthy adults (six males) underwent four cTBS protocols. For intra-regional priming, cTBS was applied twice to the left M1 (M1-M1). For inter-regional M1 priming, cTBS was applied to the ipsilateral (left) dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC-M1), and ipsilateral (left) dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC-M1). In the control condition, sham stimulation was applied to left M1, followed by active cTBS also applied to the left M1 (sham-M1). Each round of cTBS was separated by 10 min. Neuroplastic responses were indexed using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from the left M1 hand region, and measured from the contralateral first dorsal interosseous (right hand). MEP measurements were taken before the first round of cTBS priming, then immediately, 10, 20 and 30 min after the second test round of cTBS. The primary two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant differences in MEP responses across each condition (no main effects or interaction). Intra- and inter-regional priming of the left M1 using cTBS does not induce consistent neuroplastic effects. Further work is required to identify factors which contribute to such variability in human responses to NIBS.
人类对非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术的反应可能高度可变。最近,在应用测试方案之前,先对目标脑区进行一轮条件性NIBS的启动方案,已显示出诱导更可靠效果的前景。我们研究了使用连续theta爆发刺激(cTBS)对左侧初级运动皮层(M1)进行区域内或区域间启动,是否能诱导皮质脊髓兴奋性的一致且可靠的调制。20名健康成年人(6名男性)接受了四种cTBS方案。对于区域内启动,cTBS对左侧M1进行两次刺激(M1-M1)。对于区域间M1启动,cTBS应用于同侧(左侧)背侧运动前区皮层(dPMC-M1)和同侧(左侧)背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC-M1)。在对照条件下,对左侧M1进行假刺激,然后也对左侧M1进行主动cTBS刺激(假刺激-M1)。每轮cTBS之间间隔10分钟。使用从左侧M1手部区域引出的运动诱发电位(MEP)来索引神经可塑性反应,并从对侧第一背侧骨间肌(右手)进行测量。在第一轮cTBS启动前进行MEP测量,然后在第二轮cTBS测试后立即、10分钟、20分钟和30分钟进行测量。主要的双向重复测量方差分析显示,各条件下的MEP反应没有显著差异(无主效应或交互作用)。使用cTBS对左侧M1进行区域内和区域间启动不会诱导一致的神经可塑性效应。需要进一步开展工作,以确定导致人类对NIBS反应存在这种变异性的因素。