• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隆鼻在线材料的可读性

Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.

作者信息

Santos Pauline Joy F, Daar David A, Paydar Keyianoosh Z, Wirth Garrett A

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, USA.

出版信息

World J Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):89-96.

PMID:29651397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5890371/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is a popular aesthetic and reconstructive surgical procedure. However, little is known about the content and readability of online materials for patient education. The recommended grade level for educational materials is 7th to 8th grade according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). This study aims to assess the readability of online patient resources for rhinoplasty.

METHODS

The largest public search engine, Google, was queried using the term "rhinoplasty" on February 26, 2016. Location filters were disabled and sponsored results excluded to avoid any inadvertent search bias. The 10 most popular websites were identified and all relevant, patient-directed information within one click from the original site was downloaded and saved as plain text. Readability was analyzed using five established analyses (Readability-score.com, Added Bytes, Ltd., Sussex, UK).

RESULTS

Analysis of ten websites demonstrates an average grade level of at least 12 grade. No material was at the recommended 7 to 8 grade reading level (Flesch-Kincaid, 11.1; Gunning-Fog, 14.1; Coleman-Liau, 14.5; SMOG 10.4; Automated Readability, 10.7; Average Grade Level, 12.2). Overall Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Index was 43.5, which is rated as "difficult."

CONCLUSION

Online materials available for rhinoplasty exceed NIH-recommended reading levels, which may prevent appropriate decision-making in patients considering these types of surgery. Outcomes of this study identify that Plastic Surgeons should be cognizant of available online patient materials and make efforts to develop and provide more appropriate materials. Readability results can also contribute to marketing strategy and attracting a more widespread interest in the procedure.

摘要

背景

隆鼻术是一种常见的美容整形手术。然而,关于在线患者教育资料的内容和可读性却知之甚少。根据美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的建议,教育资料的推荐阅读水平为7至8年级。本研究旨在评估隆鼻术在线患者资源的可读性。

方法

2016年2月26日,使用最大的公共搜索引擎谷歌,搜索词为“隆鼻术”。禁用了位置过滤器并排除了赞助商的结果,以避免任何无意的搜索偏差。确定了10个最受欢迎的网站,并将原始网站一键点击范围内的所有相关患者导向信息下载并保存为纯文本。使用五种既定分析方法(Readability-score.com,Added Bytes,Ltd.,英国苏塞克斯)分析可读性。

结果

对10个网站的分析表明,平均阅读水平至少为12年级。没有任何资料达到推荐的7至8年级阅读水平(弗莱什-金凯德指数为11.1;冈宁-福格指数为14.1;科尔曼-廖指数为14.5;烟雾指数为10.4;自动可读性指数为10.7;平均年级水平为12.2)。总体弗莱什-金凯德阅读易度指数为43.5,被评为“困难”。

结论

隆鼻术的在线资料超出了NIH推荐的阅读水平,这可能会妨碍考虑此类手术的患者做出适当的决策。本研究结果表明,整形外科医生应了解现有的在线患者资料,并努力开发和提供更合适的资料。可读性结果也有助于营销策略,并吸引对该手术更广泛的兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/4fbb0915e173/wjps-7-089-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/2fc634da4f77/wjps-7-089-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/b185ff61a775/wjps-7-089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/6a31230effcc/wjps-7-089-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/4fbb0915e173/wjps-7-089-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/2fc634da4f77/wjps-7-089-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/b185ff61a775/wjps-7-089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/6a31230effcc/wjps-7-089-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9180/5890371/4fbb0915e173/wjps-7-089-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.隆鼻在线材料的可读性
World J Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):89-96.
2
Readability of online materials for Dupuytren's contracture.在线 Dupuytren 挛缩材料的可读性。
J Hand Ther. 2018 Oct-Dec;31(4):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Lower Back Pain Imaging: A Readability Analysis.下背痛影像学:可读性分析
Cureus. 2023 Sep 13;15(9):e45174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45174. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Readability Assessment of Patient Information about Lymphedema and Its Treatment.淋巴水肿及其治疗的患者信息可读性评估
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):287e-295e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475747.95096.ab.
6
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
7
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.
8
Hand Surgery Resources Exceed American Health Literacy.手部外科资源超出美国健康素养水平。
Hand (N Y). 2018 Sep;13(5):547-551. doi: 10.1177/1558944717725384. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
9
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.全膝关节置换术:在线患者教育资源的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):98-106.
10
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.在线腹部整形手术患者资源的可读性评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;39(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0425-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in patient care: evaluating artificial intelligence's accuracy and accessibility in addressing blepharoplasty concerns.人工智能在患者护理中的应用:评估人工智能在解决眼睑整形问题方面的准确性和可及性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 12;45(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03611-5.
2
A Comprehensive Analysis on the Readability of Rhinoplasty-Based Web Content for Patients.基于隆鼻手术的患者网络内容可读性综合分析
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Feb;33(1):107-115. doi: 10.1177/22925503231195018. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
Readability of Online Spanish Materials for Breast Reconstruction Using Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision-making in the care of individuals with diabetes.糖尿病患者护理中的共同决策。
Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):742-51. doi: 10.1111/dme.13143.
2
Sedation shared decision-making in ambulatory venous access device placement: Effects on patient choice, satisfaction and recovery time.门诊静脉通路装置置入术中的镇静共同决策:对患者选择、满意度及恢复时间的影响
Vasc Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):355-60. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16643602. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
3
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.
使用腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣进行乳房重建的在线西班牙语材料的可读性
Cureus. 2024 Jul 15;16(7):e64616. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64616. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Patient education in the digital age: An analysis of quality and readability of online information on rhinoplasty.数字化时代的患者教育:鼻整形术在线信息质量和可读性分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 9;103(32):e39229. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039229.
5
Trends and Preferences of Rhinoplasty Among Chinese Patients: A Social Media Analysis.中国人鼻整形术的趋势和偏好:社交媒体分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Aug;48(15):2803-2811. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03893-7. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
6
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.整形外科学中的健康素养:一项范围综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4247. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004247. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Which Resources Are Better: Sales or Scholarly? An Assessment on the Readability, Quality, and Technical Features of Online Chemical Peel Websites.哪些资源更好:销售类还是学术类?对在线化学换肤网站的可读性、质量和技术特征的评估
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021 Mar 4;3(1):ojab008. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojab008. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.互联网鼻中隔成形术相关患者教育资料的可读性和质量评估。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar 17;50(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00507-z.
9
Characterizing Patient Questions Before and After Rhinoplasty on Social Media: A Big Data Approach.社交媒体中鼻整形术前和术后患者问题的特征分析:大数据方法。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;45(4):1685-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02203-9. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Missing the Mark: The State of Health Care Literacy in Plastic Surgery.未达目标:整形外科学术中的医疗健康素养状况
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 13;8(5):e2856. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002856. eCollection 2020 May.
开放式鼻中隔成形术患者对评估方法的满意度评估
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):420-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002321.
4
Readability Assessment of Patient Information about Lymphedema and Its Treatment.淋巴水肿及其治疗的患者信息可读性评估
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):287e-295e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475747.95096.ab.
5
Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.选择性外科护理的共同决策与选择:一项系统综述
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):405-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599815620558. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
6
Assessment of online patient materials for breast reconstruction.乳房重建在线患者资料评估
J Surg Res. 2015 Nov;199(1):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.072. Epub 2015 May 15.
7
Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis.隆鼻术后患者满意度:一项社交媒体分析
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jan;36(1):NP1-5. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv095. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.
9
The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience.社交媒体和易于获取的在线信息对美容整形手术实践的影响:文献综述及我们自己的经验
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Apr;39(2):270-7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
10
Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.抽脂手术的在线患者资源:可读性比较分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;76(3):349-54. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000438.