College of Geology & Environment, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Key Laboratory of Mine Geological Hazards Mechanism and Control, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China; Shaanxi Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:853-867. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.055. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
The aim of the current study was to produce groundwater spring potential maps using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence (WoE) with logistic regression (LR) and functional tree (FT) models. First, a total of 66 springs were identified by field surveys, out of which 70% of the spring locations were used for training the models and 30% of the spring locations were employed for the validation process. Second, a total of 14 affecting factors including aspect, altitude, slope, plan curvature, profile curvature, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), sediment transport index (STI), lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil, distance to roads, and distance to streams was used to analyze the spatial relationship between these affecting factors and spring occurrences. Multicollinearity analysis and feature selection of the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method were employed to optimize the affecting factors. Subsequently, the novel ensembles of the WoE, LR, and FT models were constructed using the training dataset. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, standard error, confidence interval (CI) at 95%, and significance level P were employed to validate and compare the performance of three models. Overall, all three models performed well for groundwater spring potential evaluation. The prediction capability of the FT model, with the highest AUC values, the smallest standard errors, the narrowest CIs, and the smallest P values for the training and validation datasets, is better compared to those of other models. The groundwater spring potential maps can be adopted for the management of water resources and land use by planners and engineers.
本研究旨在利用新颖的集成证据权重(WoE)与逻辑回归(LR)和功能树(FT)模型生成地下水泉潜力图。首先,通过野外调查确定了总共 66 个泉,其中 70%的泉位置用于训练模型,30%的泉位置用于验证过程。其次,总共使用了 14 个影响因素,包括方位、海拔、坡度、平面曲率、剖面曲率、水流功率指数(SPI)、地形湿度指数(TWI)、泥沙输移指数(STI)、岩性、归一化植被指数(NDVI)、土地利用、土壤、到道路的距离和到溪流的距离,以分析这些影响因素与泉点之间的空间关系。使用多重共线性分析和相关属性评估(CAE)方法的特征选择来优化影响因素。随后,使用训练数据集构建了新颖的 WoE、LR 和 FT 模型集成。最后,使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线、标准误差、95%置信区间(CI)和显著性水平 P 来验证和比较三个模型的性能。总体而言,所有三个模型在地下水泉潜力评价方面表现良好。FT 模型的预测能力最好,具有最高的 AUC 值、最小的标准误差、最窄的 CI 和最小的 P 值,对于训练和验证数据集都是如此。地下水泉潜力图可被规划者和工程师用于水资源和土地利用管理。