Jo Ara, Mainous Arch G
Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e019200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019200.
To examine the value of percent body fat (%BF) with body mass index (BMI) to assess the risk of abnormal blood glucose (ABG) among US adults who are normal weight or overweight. We hypothesised that normal-weight population with higher %BF is more likely to have ABG.
A cross-sectional study.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2006, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Participants were US adults aged 40 and older who have never been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes by a doctor (unweighted n=6335, weighted n=65 705 694). The study population was classified into four groups: (1) normal weight with normal %BF, (2) normal weight with high %BF, (3) overweight with normal %BF and (4) overweight with high %BF.
ORs for ABG including pre-diabetes and undiagnosed diabetes (HbA1c ≥5.7%, ≥39 mmol/mol).
64% of population with normal BMI classification had a high %BF. Prevalence of ABG in normal-weight group with high %BF (13.5%) is significantly higher than the overweight group with low %BF (10.5%, P<0.001). In an unadjusted model, the OR of ABG was significantly greater in adults at normal BMI with high %BF compared with individuals at normal weight with low %BF. In an adjusted model controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, first-degree-relative diabetes, vigorous-intensity activities and muscle strengthening activities, risks of ABG were greater in population with normal weight and high %BF (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.38) and with overweight and low %BF (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.98, P<0.05).
Integrating BMI with %BF can improve in classification to direct screening and prevention efforts to a group currently considered healthy and avoid penalties and stigmatisation of other groups that are classified as high risk of ABG.
研究在美国体重正常或超重的成年人中,体脂百分比(%BF)与体重指数(BMI)评估血糖异常(ABG)风险的价值。我们假设,%BF较高的体重正常人群更易出现血糖异常。
横断面研究。
美国疾病控制与预防中心国家卫生统计中心开展的1999 - 2006年国家健康与营养检查调查。
年龄在40岁及以上、从未被医生诊断为2型糖尿病的美国成年人(未加权n = 6335,加权n = 65705694)。研究人群分为四组:(1)体重正常且%BF正常,(2)体重正常但%BF高,(3)超重且%BF正常,(4)超重且%BF高。
血糖异常(包括糖尿病前期和未诊断出的糖尿病,糖化血红蛋白≥5.7%,≥39 mmol/mol)的比值比(OR)。
BMI分类正常的人群中,64%的人体脂百分比高。%BF高的体重正常组血糖异常患病率(13.5%)显著高于%BF低的超重组(10.5%,P < 0.001)。在未校正模型中,BMI正常且%BF高的成年人血糖异常的OR显著高于体重正常且%BF低的个体。在控制年龄、性别、种族/民族、一级亲属糖尿病、高强度活动和肌肉强化活动的校正模型中,体重正常且%BF高的人群(OR 1.55,95%CI 1.01至2.38)和超重且%BF低的人群(OR 1.17,95%CI 0.69至1.98,P < 0.05)血糖异常风险更高。
将BMI与%BF相结合可改善分类,将筛查和预防工作直接指向目前被认为健康的人群,避免对被归类为血糖异常高风险的其他人群造成惩罚和污名化。