Lantaya Charisse A, Miguel Caio F, Howland Timothy G, LaFrance Danielle L, Page Scott V
California State University, Sacramento.
Endicott College.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2018 May;109(3):533-550. doi: 10.1002/jeab.326. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
Traditionally, behavior analysts have studied stimulus equivalence using a matching-to-sample (MTS) preparation. Although researchers have shown the utility of MTS to yield equivalence classes, the procedure requires several prerequisite skills for a learner to accurately respond. Previous research with humans and nonhumans has shown that relational responding can be produced via compound stimulus discrimination and successive matching-to-sample (S-MTS). We conducted four experiments with college students to further evaluate the effectiveness of S-MTS in the establishment of stimulus relations. S-MTS trials consisted of the presentation of a single sample stimulus followed by one comparison in a fixed location on a computer screen. Depending upon the sample-comparison relation, participants touched (i.e., go) or did not touch (i.e., no-go) the comparison stimulus. Following training of the baseline relations (AB/BC), we assessed the emergence of symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence performances (i.e., BA/CB and AC/CA). Results support the utility of the S-MTS procedure as a possible alternative to traditional MTS. This study has direct implications for participants for whom traditional three-array MTS procedures may be challenging.
传统上,行为分析师使用匹配样本(MTS)范式来研究刺激等价性。尽管研究人员已经证明了MTS在产生等价类方面的效用,但该程序要求学习者具备几种先决技能才能准确做出反应。先前对人类和非人类的研究表明,关系反应可以通过复合刺激辨别和连续匹配样本(S-MTS)产生。我们对大学生进行了四项实验,以进一步评估S-MTS在建立刺激关系方面的有效性。S-MTS试验包括呈现单个样本刺激,然后在计算机屏幕上的固定位置进行一次比较。根据样本与比较的关系,参与者触摸(即“是”)或不触摸(即“否”)比较刺激。在对基线关系(AB/BC)进行训练之后,我们评估了对称性、传递性和等价性表现(即BA/CB和AC/CA)的出现情况。结果支持S-MTS程序作为传统MTS可能替代方法的效用。这项研究对那些传统的三阵列MTS程序可能具有挑战性的参与者具有直接影响。