Suppr超能文献

对阿替卡因的真正过敏反应:一项为期25年的分析。

True Allergies to Articaine: A 25-Year Analysis.

作者信息

Halling Frank, Neff Andreas, Meisgeier Axel

机构信息

Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, UKGM GmbH, University Hospital Marburg and Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;13(5):180. doi: 10.3390/dj13050180.

Abstract

: Although allergic reactions to amide local anesthetics (LA) are rare, it is important for medical professionals to be aware of their potential occurrence. Despite the fact that articaine is one of the most commonly used LA in dentistry, a survey of documented cases of allergies to articaine is absent from the literature. The objective of this review was to ascertain how often true allergies to articaine, verified by standard allergological procedures, have been reported over the last 25 years. : A comprehensive review of the literature from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2024 was conducted using the PubMed-MEDLINE database. The search was limited to articles investigating suspected allergy to articaine. The search strategy encompassed indexing terms, keywords, and free-text words, complemented by an extensive manual search. The final determination was based on the application of skin and/or challenge tests as the gold standard for identifying articaine as the causative agent. : During the investigation period, 10 case reports and six case series, encompassing 29 patients with a confirmed true allergy to articaine, were identified. The age of the patients ranged from 8 to 65 years, with a median age of 34 years. Of these patients, 20 were diagnosed with an immediate type I allergy, while 5 patients exhibited a delayed type IV allergy. In four cases the specific type of allergy was not mentioned. In the majority of cases an intradermal test (IDT) was employed to ascertain the specific type of allergy. Cross-reactivity with other amide LA was reported in three cases. : True allergies to articaine are exceedingly rare. Investigation strategies should include a combination of a thorough clinical history and a standardized allergological procedure entailing skin tests and challenge. Only a comprehensive approach ensures the accurate identification of affected patients and facilitates the selection of a tolerated LA.

摘要

虽然对酰胺类局部麻醉药(LA)的过敏反应很少见,但医疗专业人员了解其潜在发生情况很重要。尽管阿替卡因是牙科中最常用的局部麻醉药之一,但文献中缺乏对阿替卡因过敏病例的记录调查。本综述的目的是确定在过去25年中,经标准过敏程序证实的对阿替卡因的真正过敏报告的频率。:使用PubMed-MEDLINE数据库对2000年1月1日至2024年12月31日的文献进行了全面综述。搜索仅限于调查疑似对阿替卡因过敏的文章。搜索策略包括索引词、关键词和自由文本词,并辅以广泛的手动搜索。最终的判定基于将皮肤和/或激发试验作为确定阿替卡因作为致病因素的金标准。:在调查期间,确定了10例病例报告和6个病例系列,包括29例确诊对阿替卡因真正过敏的患者。患者年龄从8岁到65岁不等,中位年龄为34岁。在这些患者中,20例被诊断为速发型I型过敏,而5例表现为迟发型IV型过敏。在4例中未提及具体的过敏类型。在大多数情况下,采用皮内试验(IDT)来确定具体的过敏类型。3例报告了与其他酰胺类局部麻醉药的交叉反应。:对阿替卡因的真正过敏极为罕见。调查策略应包括全面的临床病史和标准化的过敏程序,包括皮肤试验和激发试验。只有综合方法才能确保准确识别受影响的患者,并有助于选择可耐受的局部麻醉药。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验