• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实体器官移植受者的阴茎假体——一项匹配队列研究

Penile Prosthesis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-A Matched Cohort Study.

作者信息

Sun Andrew Y, Babbar Paurush, Gill Bradley C, Angermeier Kenneth W, Montague Drogo K

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.

Cleveland Clinic, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Urology. 2018 Jul;117:86-88. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.048. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.048
PMID:29656065
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) are at higher risk of developing complications after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes data for all patients with SOT who underwent IPP placement at our institution. A cohort of age-matched IPP recipients without SOT were used as controls.

RESULTS

We identified 26 patients who underwent SOT and IPP between 1999 and 2015, and 26 controls. Transplants included heart (3), liver (2), kidney only (17), and kidney and pancreas (4). Mean follow-up time after IPP placement was 29.5 months (SOT group) and 13.5 months (controls). Age at IPP did not significantly differ between groups (53.7 + 8.1 vs 56.4 + 9.0, P = .26), nor did body mass index (30.3 + 5.5 vs 30.2 + 4.7, P = .92), history of prostatectomy (7.7% vs 15.4%, P = .39), rectal surgery (3.9% vs 3.9%, P = 1.00), hyperlipidemia (69.2% vs 69.2%, P = 1.00), hypertension (92.3% vs 76.9%, P = .25), or heart disease (57.7% vs 30.8%, P = .093). Peripheral vascular disease was more common in transplant patients (26.9% vs 3.9%, P = .021), as were stroke (19.2% vs 0.0%, P = .05) and diabetes (84.6% vs 53.6%, P = .016). No significant differences in IPP reoperation rates existed between patients with vs without SOT (11.5% vs 11.5%, P = 1.00), nor did they differ by organ transplanted (P = 1.00). No differences in IPP reoperation rate existed between 2-piece vs 3-piece IPP models (P = .47).

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of IPP implantation in patients with SOT are similar to those of nontransplant patients. Patients with SOT should be considered suitable candidates for penile prosthesis.

摘要

目的

确定实体器官移植(SOT)患者在植入可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)后发生并发症的风险是否更高。

方法

我们回顾性分析了在我们机构接受IPP植入的所有SOT患者的结局数据。将一组年龄匹配的未接受SOT的IPP接受者作为对照。

结果

我们确定了1999年至2015年间26例接受SOT和IPP植入的患者以及26例对照。移植器官包括心脏(3例)、肝脏(2例)、单纯肾脏(17例)和肾脏及胰腺(4例)。IPP植入后的平均随访时间在SOT组为29.5个月,在对照组为13.5个月。两组患者IPP植入时的年龄无显著差异(53.7±8.1岁 vs 56.4±9.0岁,P = 0.26),体重指数也无显著差异(30.3±5.5 vs 30.2±4.7,P = 0.92),前列腺切除术史(7.7% vs 15.4%,P = 0.39)、直肠手术史(3.9% vs 3.9%,P = 1.00)、高脂血症(69.2% vs 69.2%,P = 1.00)、高血压(92.3% vs 76.9%,P = 0.25)或心脏病(57.7% vs 30.8%,P = 0.093)方面也无显著差异。外周血管疾病在移植患者中更常见(26.9% vs 3.9%,P = 0.021),中风(19.2% vs 0.0%,P = 0.05)和糖尿病(84.6% vs 53.6%,P = 0.016)也是如此。接受SOT和未接受SOT的患者在IPP再次手术率方面无显著差异(11.5% vs 11.5%,P = 1.00),按移植器官不同也无差异(P = 1.00)。两件式与三件式IPP模型在IPP再次手术率方面无差异(P = 0.47)。

结论

SOT患者IPP植入的结局与非移植患者相似。SOT患者应被视为阴茎假体的合适候选者。

相似文献

1
Penile Prosthesis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-A Matched Cohort Study.实体器官移植受者的阴茎假体——一项匹配队列研究
Urology. 2018 Jul;117:86-88. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.048. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Penile prosthesis in the organ transplant recipient.器官移植受者中的阴茎假体
Urology. 2001 Jan;57(1):138-41. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00876-1.
3
Delayed placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis is associated with a high complication rate in men with a history of ischemic priapism.对于有缺血性阴茎异常勃起病史的男性,延迟放置可膨胀阴茎假体与高并发症发生率相关。
J Sex Med. 2023 Jun 28;20(7):1052-1056. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad075.
4
Immune Deficiency Does Not Increase Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates.免疫缺陷并不会增加可充胀性 penile 假体修复手术的再手术率。
J Sex Med. 2021 Aug;18(8):1427-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Outcomes of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis following Radical Cystectomy: A Matched Cohort Analysis.根治性膀胱切除术后可膨胀阴茎假体的结局:一项匹配队列分析。
Urology. 2023 May;175:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.047. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
6
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.阴茎假体植入术后的长期随访——生存和生活质量结果。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后 3 件式可膨胀阴茎假体植入术:技术与结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Repair of penile prosthesis-induced impending erosion using xenograft during simultaneous inflatable penile prosthesis replacement.同期更换可膨胀 penile 假体时使用异种移植物修复 penile 假体诱发的即将发生的侵蚀。
J Sex Med. 2023 Oct 31;20(11):1353-1358. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad127.
9
Novel Multi-Modal Analgesia Protocol Significantly Decreases Opioid Requirements in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Patients.新型多模式镇痛方案显著降低了可充气阴茎假体患者的阿片类药物需求。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1187-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
10
Impact of Pelvic Radiation Therapy on Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates.盆腔放射治疗对可膨胀阴茎假体翻修率的影响。
J Sex Med. 2018 Nov;15(11):1653-1658. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.09.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to Comment on: Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review.对评论的回复:在实体器官移植受者中植入阴茎假体是否安全?一项系统评价。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01050-5.
2
Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review.可膨胀阴茎假体手术围手术期感染的预防:一项叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1628-1640. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-497. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review.
在实体器官移植受者中植入阴茎假体安全吗?一项系统评价。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):18-26. doi: 10.1038/s41443-024-00939-x. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
Penile prosthesis in the medically complex patient: a narrative review.复杂医学状况患者的阴茎假体:一篇叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Dec 31;12(12):1885-1892. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-71. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.半刚性阴茎假体的现状。
Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Jan 9;22(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01028-4.
6
Postoperative outcomes of kidney transplant recipients undergoing non-transplant-related elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肾移植受者接受非移植相关择期手术的术后结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Aug 25;21(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01978-4.
7
Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.与阴茎假体感染相关的风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Impot Res. 2020 Nov;32(6):587-597. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0232-x. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Updates in penile prosthesis infections.阴茎假体感染的最新进展。
Asian J Androl. 2020 Jan-Feb;22(1):28-33. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_84_19.
9
Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients.复杂阴茎假体接受者的感染预防注意事项
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Feb 1;20(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0875-7.
10
Penile Implant Considerations in the Bladder Cancer Survivor.膀胱癌幸存者阴茎植入的考量因素
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jan 28;20(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0873-9.