Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
On January 1, 2017, Philadelphia implemented a beverage tax of $0.015/ounce on sugar ("regular") and sugar-substitute ("diet") beverages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate impact of the tax on residents' consumption of soda, fruit drinks, energy drinks, and bottled water.
A repeat cross-sectional study design used data from a random-digit-dialing phone survey during a no-tax period (December 6-31, 2016) and a tax period (January 15-February 31, 2017) among 899 respondents in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 878 respondents in three nearby comparison cities. Survey questions included frequency and volume of bottled water and beverages. Outcomes were daily consumption, and 30-day consumption frequency and volume. Propensity score-weighted difference-in-differences regression was used to control for secular time trend and confounding. Covariates were sociodemographics, BMI, health status, smoking, and alcohol use. Analyses were conducted in 2017.
Within the first 2 months of tax implementation, relative to the comparison cities, in Philadelphia the odds of daily consumption of regular soda was 40% lower (OR=0.6, 95% CI=0.37, 0.97); energy drink was 64% lower (OR=0.36, 95% CI=0.17, 0.76); bottled water was 58% higher (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.13, 2.20); and the 30-day regular soda consumption frequency was 38% lower (ratio of consumption frequency=0.62, 95% CI=0.40, 0.98).
Early results suggest that the tax influenced daily consumption of regular soda, energy drinks, and bottled water. Future studies are needed to evaluate longer-term impact of the tax on sugared beverage consumption and substitutions.
2017 年 1 月 1 日,费城对含糖(“普通”)和含糖代用品(“无糖”)饮料征收每盎司 0.015 美元的饮料税。本研究旨在评估该税对居民消费苏打水、果汁饮料、能量饮料和瓶装水的即时影响。
采用重复横断面研究设计,在费城 899 名受访者和宾夕法尼亚州费城附近的三个比较城市的 878 名受访者中,在无税期(2016 年 12 月 6 日至 31 日)和税收期(2017 年 1 月 15 日至 2 月 31 日)期间,通过随机数字拨号电话调查收集数据。调查问题包括瓶装水和饮料的频率和量。结果是每日摄入量,以及 30 天的消费频率和量。采用倾向评分加权差分差异回归法控制季节性时间趋势和混杂因素。协变量为社会人口统计学、体重指数、健康状况、吸烟和饮酒。分析于 2017 年进行。
在税收实施后的头 2 个月内,与比较城市相比,费城普通苏打水的日消费量降低了 40%(OR=0.6,95%CI=0.37,0.97);能量饮料降低了 64%(OR=0.36,95%CI=0.17,0.76);瓶装水增加了 58%(OR=1.58,95%CI=1.13,2.20);30 天普通苏打水的消费频率降低了 38%(消费频率比=0.62,95%CI=0.40,0.98)。
初步结果表明,该税影响了普通苏打水、能量饮料和瓶装水的日消费量。需要进一步研究该税对含糖饮料消费和替代的长期影响。