• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

何时以及如何经历不文明行为会劝阻主动表现:社会计量器和自我认同取向观点的综合。

When and how experienced incivility dissuades proactive performance: An integration of sociometer and self-identity orientation perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Management, College of Business, Oregon State University`.

Department of Management, Raymond J. Harbert College of Business, Auburn University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2018 Aug;103(8):828-841. doi: 10.1037/apl0000303. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000303
PMID:29658732
Abstract

In this article we build on relational Sociometer Theory (Leary, 2005; Leary & Baumeister, 2000) to posit the impact of the belongingness threat of experienced incivility in one's work team on employee feelings of ostracism and subsequent engagement in proactive performance. Integrating the social-relational framework of Self-Identity Orientation Theory (Brewer & Gardner, 1996; Cooper & Thatcher, 2010), we nuance our predictions by hypothesizing that chronic self-identification orientations influence both the effect that experiencing incivility in one's work team exerts on feeling ostracized, and the impact that feeling ostracized has on subsequent employee proactive performance. Using a sample of 212 employees and their 51 supervising managers employed in an Internet service and solution company in China, we found support for our hypothesized model. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

在本文中,我们基于关系社会计量理论(Leary,2005;Leary & Baumeister,2000),提出了员工在工作团队中经历无礼对待的归属感威胁对其被排斥感的影响,以及随后对主动绩效的影响。我们整合了自我认同取向理论的社会关系框架(Brewer & Gardner,1996;Cooper & Thatcher,2010),通过假设慢性自我认同取向影响了在工作团队中经历无礼对待对被排斥感的影响,以及被排斥感对随后员工主动绩效的影响,从而对我们的预测进行了细化。我们使用了一家中国互联网服务和解决方案公司的 212 名员工及其 51 名主管经理的样本,发现我们的假设模型得到了支持。本文讨论了理论和实践的意义。

相似文献

1
When and how experienced incivility dissuades proactive performance: An integration of sociometer and self-identity orientation perspectives.何时以及如何经历不文明行为会劝阻主动表现:社会计量器和自我认同取向观点的综合。
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Aug;103(8):828-841. doi: 10.1037/apl0000303. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
2
Incivility and employee performance, citizenship, and counterproductive behaviors: Implications of the social context.不文明行为与员工绩效、公民行为和反生产行为:社会环境的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):213-227. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000108. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Who strikes back? A daily investigation of when and why incivility begets incivility.谁会反击?一项关于何时以及为何不文明行为会引发不文明行为的日常调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Nov;101(11):1620-1634. doi: 10.1037/apl0000140. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Ethnicity and cultural values as predictors of the occurrence and impact of experienced workplace incivility.种族和文化价值观作为工作场所不文明行为发生及影响的预测因素。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Apr;20(2):205-217. doi: 10.1037/a0038277. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
5
Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study.工作场所不文明行为对工作结束时消极情绪的影响:在一项日常日记研究中检验个体和组织的调节作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Jan;20(1):117-130. doi: 10.1037/a0038167. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
6
Supervisor Incivility and Employee Job Performance: The Mediating Roles of Job Insecurity and Amotivation.主管的无礼行为与员工工作绩效:工作不安全感和动机缺失的中介作用。
J Psychol. 2020;154(1):38-59. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2019.1645634. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
7
Supervision Incivility and Employee Psychological Safety in the Workplace.工作场所中的监督不文明行为与员工心理安全感
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 29;17(3):840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030840.
8
When does incivility lead to counterproductive work behavior? Roles of job involvement, task interdependence, and gender.无礼行为何时会导致适得其反的工作行为?工作投入、任务相互依存和性别角色的作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Apr;22(2):194-206. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000029. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
9
Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: An organizational identification perspective.为什么和何时工作场所排斥会抑制组织公民行为:组织认同视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Mar;101(3):362-378. doi: 10.1037/apl0000063. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
Workplace incivility and employee sleep: The role of rumination and recovery experiences.工作场所不文明行为与员工睡眠:反刍和恢复体验的作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):228-240. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000116. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment.身份认同如何影响旁观者对职场虐待行为的反应。
J Manage. 2024 Sep;50(7):2641-2674. doi: 10.1177/01492063231177976. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
Social identity and social integration: a meta-analysis exploring the relationship between social identity and social integration.社会认同与社会融合:一项探索社会认同与社会融合之间关系的元分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 4;15:1361163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361163. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of Co-Worker Ostracism on Organizational Citizenship Behavior Through Employee Self-Identity: The Moderating Role of Ethical Leadership.
同事排斥通过员工自我认同对组织公民行为的影响:道德领导的调节作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Aug 18;16:3279-3302. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S415036. eCollection 2023.
4
How workplace incivility leads to work alienation: A moderated mediation model.职场不文明行为如何导致工作疏离:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:921161. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921161. eCollection 2022.
5
The Embodiment of Insult: A Theory of Biobehavioral Response to Workplace Incivility.侮辱的体现:一种对职场无礼行为的生物行为反应理论。
J Manage. 2022 Mar;48(3):738-763. doi: 10.1177/0149206321989798. Epub 2021 Mar 16.