• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动(而非听觉)注意会影响句法选择。

Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice.

机构信息

Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation.

Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 16;13(4):e0195547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195547. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195547
PMID:29659592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5902030/
Abstract

Understanding the determinants of syntactic choice in sentence production is a salient topic in psycholinguistics. Existing evidence suggests that syntactic choice results from an interplay between linguistic and non-linguistic factors, and a speaker's attention to the elements of a described event represents one such factor. Whereas multimodal accounts of attention suggest a role for different modalities in this process, existing studies examining attention effects in syntactic choice are primarily based on visual cueing paradigms. Hence, it remains unclear whether attentional effects on syntactic choice are limited to the visual modality or are indeed more general. This issue is addressed by the current study. Native English participants viewed and described line drawings of simple transitive events while their attention was directed to the location of the agent or the patient of the depicted event by means of either an auditory (monaural beep) or a motor (unilateral key press) lateral cue. Our results show an effect of cue location, with participants producing more passive-voice descriptions in the patient-cued conditions. Crucially, this cue location effect emerged in the motor-cue but not (or substantially less so) in the auditory-cue condition, as confirmed by a reliable interaction between cue location (agent vs. patient) and cue type (auditory vs. motor). Our data suggest that attentional effects on the speaker's syntactic choices are modality-specific and limited to the visual and motor, but not the auditory, domain.

摘要

理解句子生成中句法选择的决定因素是心理语言学中的一个重要课题。现有证据表明,句法选择是语言和非语言因素相互作用的结果,而说话者对描述事件元素的关注是其中一个因素。虽然多模态注意力理论表明不同模态在这个过程中都有作用,但现有的研究主要基于视觉提示范式来考察注意力对句法选择的影响。因此,目前尚不清楚注意力对句法选择的影响是否仅限于视觉模态,或者是否更为普遍。本研究旨在解决这一问题。母语为英语的参与者观看并描述简单及物事件的线条图,同时通过听觉(单耳蜂鸣)或运动(单侧按键)侧向提示将注意力引导至所描述事件的施事者或受事者的位置。我们的研究结果表明,提示位置存在影响,即参与者在受事者提示条件下更倾向于使用被动语态进行描述。关键的是,这种提示位置效应仅在运动提示条件下出现,而在听觉提示条件下(或者出现的程度显著降低)则不然,这一发现得到了提示位置(施事者与受事者)和提示类型(听觉与运动)之间的可靠交互作用的证实。我们的数据表明,注意力对说话者句法选择的影响具有模态特异性,仅局限于视觉和运动模态,而与听觉模态无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/2735674f001c/pone.0195547.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/28378e1f5d0f/pone.0195547.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/f727ae7f4933/pone.0195547.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/2735674f001c/pone.0195547.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/28378e1f5d0f/pone.0195547.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/f727ae7f4933/pone.0195547.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/5902030/2735674f001c/pone.0195547.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Motor (but not auditory) attention affects syntactic choice.运动(而非听觉)注意会影响句法选择。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 16;13(4):e0195547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195547. eCollection 2018.
2
Determinants of structural choice in visually situated sentence production.视觉情境句子生成中结构选择的决定因素。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):304-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
Effects of Visual Priming and Event Orientation on Word Order Choice in Russian Sentence Production.视觉启动和事件取向对俄语句子生成中词序选择的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01661. eCollection 2019.
4
The contribution of visual and linguistic cues to the production of passives in ADHD and DLD: evidence from thematic priming.视觉和语言线索对注意缺陷多动障碍及发育性语言障碍患者被动语态产出的影响:来自主题启动的证据
Clin Linguist Phon. 2023 Jan 2;37(1):17-51. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.2006789. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.在具有跨模态空间线索提示的搜索任务中,注意重新定向会引发空间不对称。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0190677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190677. eCollection 2018.
6
The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.自上而下的空间注意在偶然注意捕获中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):650-62. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12615. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
7
Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues.视觉情绪线索对听觉空间注意的调节:愉快和不愉快线索在注意参与和脱离方面的差异效应。
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0749-6. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
The road to understanding is paved with the speaker's intentions: cues to the speaker's attention and intentions affect pronoun comprehension.通往理解的道路是由说话者的意图铺就的:说话者注意力和意图的线索会影响代词的理解。
Cogn Psychol. 2014 May;70:58-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
9
Disentangling attention from action in the emotional spatial cueing task.在情绪空间线索任务中区分注意力与行动
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(7):1223-41. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.878688. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
10
The immediate effect of attentional, auditory, and a combined cue strategy on gait during single and dual tasks in Parkinson's disease.注意力、听觉及联合提示策略对帕金森病患者单任务和双任务步态的即时影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12):1593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Visual Priming and Event Orientation on Word Order Choice in Russian Sentence Production.视觉启动和事件取向对俄语句子生成中词序选择的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1661. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01661. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateralized electrical brain activity reveals covert attention allocation during speaking.大脑电活动的偏侧化揭示了说话过程中隐蔽的注意力分配。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jan 27;95:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
2
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
3
The interaction between language and visual spatial attention systems in grammatical gender processing. An N2pc study.
语法性别处理中语言和视觉空间注意系统的相互作用。一项 N2pc 研究。
Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4(3-4):217-24. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2013.823392. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
A functional MRI study of a picture-sentence verification task: evidence of attention shift to the grammatical subject.一项关于图片-句子验证任务的功能磁共振成像研究:注意力转向语法主语的证据。
Neuroreport. 2013 Apr 17;24(6):298-302. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835f8826.
5
Auditory spatial attention representations in the human cerebral cortex.人类大脑皮层中的听觉空间注意表示。
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):773-84. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs359. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
6
Determinants of structural choice in visually situated sentence production.视觉情境句子生成中结构选择的决定因素。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):304-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
7
The role of attention in the affordance effect: can we afford to ignore it?注意力在可供性效应中的作用:我们能忽视它吗?
Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S215-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0452-1.
8
Visual attention: the past 25 years.视觉注意力:过去25年
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
9
The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.注意与多感觉整合的多方面相互作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep;14(9):400-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.008. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
10
Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies.注意力与多感官整合的多个阶段:视听研究综述
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jul;134(3):372-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 27.